Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Titolo: The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2019
Descrizione fisica: 1 electronic resource (108 p.)
Disciplina: 153.9
Soggetto topico: Intelligence
Forecasting
Soggetto non controllato: general cognitive ability
second stratum abilities
narrow abilities
cognitive abilities
ability tilt
identification
occupational attainment
scholastic performance
longevity
non-g residuals
specific abilities
higher-order factor model
bifactor model
intelligence
general intelligence (g)
specific factors
academic achievement
hierarchical factor model
educational attainment
nested-factor models
ability differentiation
general abilities
relative importance
relative importance analysis
bifactor(S-1) model
subscores
g-factor
school grades
non-g factors
nested-factors model
general mental ability
cognitive tests
specific cognitive abilities
curvilinear relations
specific ability
situational specificity
predictor-criterion bandwidth alignment
job performance
health
machine learning
academic performance
general factor
Persona (resp. second.): KellHarrison J.
LangJonas W.B.
Sommario/riassunto: There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as—or even more—effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate.
Altri titoli varianti: Great Debate
Titolo autorizzato: The great debate  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 3-03921-168-4
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910346667303321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui