01682cam1 2200301 450 E60020003143820140718082406.020071112g00009999|||||ita|0103 baitaITUn secolo di progresso scientifico italiano 1839-1939Opera storica redatta da circa 200 collaboratori sotto la direzione del comitato scientifico della S.I.P.S. pubblicazione a cura del segretario generale prof. Lucio SillaRomaSocietà italiana per il progresso delle scienzev.27 cm001SOBE000443932000 <<1: >>Matematica, matematica attuariale, statistica matematica, calcolo delle probabilità, astronomia, geodesia, fisica001SOBE000443942000 <<2: >>Ingegneria, chimica, mineralogia, geologia, geografia001SOBE000443952000 <<3: >>Scienze militari001SOBE000443962000 <<4: >>Zoologia, anatomia, botanica, fisiologia, psicologia001SOBE000443972000 <<5: >>Patologia, antropologia, etnologia, paleontologia umana, scienze agrarie e forestali001SOBE000443982000 <<6: >>Storia, archeologia, filologia, glottologia, scienze economiche e sociali, scienze giuridiche, filosofia001SOBE000443992000 <<7: >>Complementi-appendice-indici generaliSilla, LucioA600200044616070*Società italiana per il progresso delle scienzeSOBA00010281070ITUNISOB20140718RICAE600200031438M 102 Monografia moderna SBNMUn secolo di progresso scientifico italiano 1839-19391688333UNISOB03586nam 2200865z- 450 9910346667303321202102113-03921-168-4(CKB)4920000000094994(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48877(oapen)doab48877(EXLCZ)99492000000009499420202102d2019 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important OutcomesMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute20191 online resource (108 p.)3-03921-167-6 There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as-or even more-effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate.Great DebatePsychologybicsscability differentiationability tiltacademic achievementacademic performancebifactor modelbifactor(S-1) modelcognitive abilitiescognitive testscurvilinear relationseducational attainmentg-factorgeneral abilitiesgeneral cognitive abilitygeneral factorgeneral intelligence (g)general mental abilityhealthhierarchical factor modelhigher-order factor modelidentificationintelligencejob performancelongevitymachine learningnarrow abilitiesnested-factor modelsnested-factors modelnon-g factorsnon-g residualsoccupational attainmentpredictor-criterion bandwidth alignmentrelative importancerelative importance analysisscholastic performanceschool gradessecond stratum abilitiessituational specificityspecific abilitiesspecific abilityspecific cognitive abilitiesspecific factorssubscoresPsychology153.9Kell Harrison J.Lang Jonas W.B.BOOK9910346667303321The great debate3397318UNINA