LEADER 03687nam  2200877z- 450 
001 9910346667303321
005 20240424230120.0
010   $a3-03921-168-4
035   $a(CKB)4920000000094994
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48877
035   $a(EXLCZ)994920000000094994
100   $a20202102d2019      |y         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|---annan
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 04$aThe great debate $egeneral ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes /$fspecial issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang
210   $cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2019
215   $a1 electronic resource (108 p.)
311   $a3-03921-167-6 
330   $aThere are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as?or even more?effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate.
517   $aGreat Debate
606   $aIntelligence
606   $aForecasting
610   $ageneral cognitive ability
610   $asecond stratum abilities
610   $anarrow abilities
610   $acognitive abilities
610   $aability tilt
610   $aidentification
610   $aoccupational attainment
610   $ascholastic performance
610   $alongevity
610   $anon-g residuals
610   $aspecific abilities
610   $ahigher-order factor model
610   $abifactor model
610   $aintelligence
610   $ageneral intelligence (g)
610   $aspecific factors
610   $aacademic achievement
610   $ahierarchical factor model
610   $aeducational attainment
610   $anested-factor models
610   $aability differentiation
610   $ageneral abilities
610   $arelative importance
610   $arelative importance analysis
610   $abifactor(S-1) model
610   $asubscores
610   $ag-factor
610   $aschool grades
610   $anon-g factors
610   $anested-factors model
610   $ageneral mental ability
610   $acognitive tests
610   $aspecific cognitive abilities
610   $acurvilinear relations
610   $aspecific ability
610   $asituational specificity
610   $apredictor-criterion bandwidth alignment
610   $ajob performance
610   $ahealth
610   $amachine learning
610   $aacademic performance
610   $ageneral factor
615  0$aIntelligence.
615  0$aForecasting.
676   $a153.9
702   $aKell$b Harrison J.
702   $aLang$b Jonas W.B.
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910346667303321
996   $aThe great debate$93397318
997   $aUNINA