Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility : Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement / / by Andrea Robitzsch



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Robitzsch Andrea Visualizza persona
Titolo: An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility : Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement / / by Andrea Robitzsch Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2019
Edizione: 1st ed. 2019.
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (237 pages)
Disciplina: 121
Soggetto topico: Knowledge, Theory of
Psychology
Social sciences—Philosophy
Personality
Social psychology
Religion and sociology
Epistemology
General Psychology
Social Philosophy
Personality and Social Psychology
Religion and Society
Nota di contenuto: Chapter 1. Doxastic responsibility and direct doxastic control -- Chapter 2. An approach to indirect doxastic responsibility -- Chapter 3. Intellectual norms and epistemic normativity -- Chapter 4. What should we do in the face of epistemic peer disagreement?.
Sommario/riassunto: This monograph provides a novel reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment. The author presents unique arguments for the epistemic significance of belief-influencing actions and omissions. She grounds her proposal in indirect doxastic control. The book consists of four chapters. The first two chapters look at the different ways in which an agent might control the revision, retention, or rejection of her beliefs. They provide a systematic overview of the different approaches to doxastic control and contain a thorough study of reasons-responsive approaches to direct and indirect doxastic control. The third chapter provides a reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment which is based on indirect doxastic control. In the fourth chapter, the author examines epistemic peer disagreement and applies her reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment to this debate. She argues that the epistemic significance of peer disagreement does not only rely on the way in which an agent should revise her belief in the face of disagreement, it also relies on the way in which an agent should act. This book deals with questions of meliorative epistemology in general and with questions concerning doxastic responsibility and epistemic responsibility assessment in particular. It will appeal to graduate students and researchers with an interest in epistemology.
Titolo autorizzato: An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 3-030-19077-3
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910337692603321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui
Serie: Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, . 0166-6991 ; ; 411