Axiological pluralism : jurisdiction, law-making and pluralisms / / Lucia Busatta, Carlo Casonato, editors

• Pubblicazione: Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2021]; ©2021
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (253 pages)
• Disciplina: 344.041
• Soggetto topico: Medical laws and legislation
• Persona (resp. second.): BusattaLucia; CasonatoCarlo
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.
• Nota di contenuto: Intro -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Axiological Pluralism and Biolaw -- 2 The Role of the Courts: Lords of Law? -- 3 The Role of Other Institutions (Quasi-Jurisdictional or Consultative) and Other Tools -- 4 Case-Studies for a Sustainable Pluralism -- 5 A Last Disclaimer: Biolaw and the Pandemic -- Part I: Adjudication and Regulation Facing Pluralisms: Models and Trends -- BioLaw Facing Pluralisms: Three Simple Models for Complex Issues -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Added Value of Models -- 3 The ``Preclusive´´ Model -- 3.1 The Many Shades of Constitutional Adjudication Regarding Assisted Suicide -- 4 The Inactive Model: Basic Features -- 5 The Integrative Model -- 5.1 An Integrative Approach Lacking Effectiveness -- 5.2 If It Is Scientifically Possible, Then Do It! -- 5.3 A Scientific Evolution That Brings More Inclusion -- 5.4 Against a Falsely Integrative Model -- 6 Conclusions: In Search of Sustainable Pluralism -- References -- Some Patterns for ``Scientific Adjudication´´: The Role of Courts in Reconciling Axiological Pluralism and Scientific Complexi... -- 1 ``Scientific Adjudication´´: Courts as `Mediator´ Between Scientific Complexity and Ethical Sensitiveness as a Coherent Expr... -- 2 ECtHR Case-Law: Axiological Prevalence vis à vis States´ Margin of Appreciation -- 3 National Courts Assessing Political Choices: Constitutional Principles as the Golden Thread Running Through Scientific Adjud... -- 4 Science Integrates the Axiological Dimension: Tool for Managing Axiological Pluralism -- 4.1 Science as a Tool for Constitutional Interpretation: The Case of the ``Unborn Child´´ and the Supreme Court of Ireland -- 4.2 Science as a Tool for Assessing Political Choices: From Self-Restraint to Scientific Reasonableness -- 4.2.1 Judicial Self-Restraint Reinforced by the Scientific Nature of Issues at Stake: France. ; 4.2.2 Judicial Review Based on Scientific Reasonableness of the Law: Italy -- 4.2.3 `Science-Based´ Judicial Review: Portugal (ARTs) -- 5 Science Is Absorbed by Axiological Dimension: Context of Expression for Axiological Pluralism -- 5.1 Legislature´s Supremacy and Axiological Complexity: End of Life Issues (UK) -- 5.2 Legislature´s Primacy and Axiological Assessment: Surrogacy in Portugal and Assisted Suicide in Canada -- 5.3 Legislature´s Choices and Axiological Interpretation: Surrogacy Agreements in Argentina -- 6 Scientific Enhancement of Law as Prerequisite for a Sustainable Scientific Adjudication: The Essential Integration Between A... -- References -- Part II: Accommodating Pluralisms Beyond Courts: Institutions and Tools -- Research Ethics Committees -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Bioethics and Research Ethics Committees in Biomedicine -- 3 International Legal Regulation of Research Ethics Committees -- 4 The Instrumentalisation of Research Ethics Committees -- 5 Research Ethics Committees from an Institutional Perspective: Unresolved Issues -- 6 Conclusions and Proposals -- References -- Consultative Boards at International Level -- 1 The Need for Bioethics Committees as Independent Advisory Bodies -- 2 Background -- 2.1 A Favourable International Context -- 2.2 Institutional Antecedents -- 2.2.1 The Bioethics Committee (DH-BIO) of the Council of Europe -- 2.2.2 The International Bioethics Committee (IBC) of UNESCO -- 2.2.3 The European Group on Ethics in Sciences and New Technologies -- 3 Features of International and Supranational Committees -- 3.1 Specialisation -- 3.2 Multidisciplinarity -- 3.3 Independence -- 3.4 Pluralism -- 3.5 Transparency -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- Reckoning with Growing Pluralism. Potentials and Limits of Conscientious Objection: Conscience Clauses in Abortion Laws in Eur. ; 1 Conscientious Objection: A Technique for the Protection of Pluralism -- 2 Protecting Conscience: Direct and Indirect Involvement in the Law´s Application -- 3 Protecting the Law from Conscientious Objection -- 4 Conscientious Objection: A Necessary Technique in Pluralistic Societies -- References -- Professional Medical Ethics -- 1 Between Professional Ethics and Law: Some Preliminary Remarks -- 2 Codes of Medical Ethics As Sources of Law: Plurality of Actors and Variety of Models -- 2.1 Medical Professional Associations As Public-Interest Bodies -- 2.2 The Legal Value of Codes of Medical Ethics: A Comparative Overview -- 3 Axiological and Legal Pluralism in Biolaw: The Perspective of the CME -- 3.1 Medical Ethics and Law: Integration Patterns and Conflicting Rules -- 3.2 The Conscience Clause Between Professional Autonomy and Fundamental Rights -- 4 Deontological Liability and Disciplinary Procedure: Jurisdictional and Quasi-Jurisdictional Bodies -- 5 Summarising the (Possible) Role of Codes of Medical Ethics: The Case of Physician-Assisted Suicide -- References -- Part III: Case Studies -- Axiological Pluralism: Conflict in the Hospital, Resolution in the Courts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Risks Presented by Axiological Pluralism: A Possible Conversation -- 2.1 What Kind of Risks? -- 2.2 Is There a Risk? -- 2.3 Some Proposals for Dealing with the Legitimacy Deficit -- 2.3.1 Deliberative Democracy -- 2.3.2 Politics as Usual and Conviction Politics -- 2.3.3 Special Procedures -- 2.3.4 Shared Responsibility -- 2.3.5 Embedding a Morality Clause -- 2.3.6 Leaving it to the Courts -- 3 Recent Medical Jurisprudence -- 3.1 Montgomery -- 3.2 James -- 3.3 Doogan -- 4 The Institutional Role and Responsibilities of the Courts -- 4.1 Taking Stock -- 5 Conclusion -- References. ; Axiological Pluralism and Health Claims as a Challenge to the Democratic Principle. The Cases of Non-Validated Therapies and V... -- 1 Introduction: The Sustainability of Axiological Value Pluralism in Health -- 2 Individual Health Claims and Pressing Emotional Needs: The Stamina Case in Italy -- 3 Right-to-Try Laws in the U.S. and the Need to Ground the Right to Health in a Rational Basis -- 4 The Debate About Vaccination Mandates as a Test for Pluralism -- 4.1 The Rule-Plus-Exemption Model of the U.S.: How Broad Can Exemptions Be? -- 4.2 The Italian Case: The Chance for Spontaneous Adhesion and the Need for Legal Mandates -- 5 Axiological Pluralism and the Democracy of Science -- References -- Reliance on Scientific Claims in Social and Legal Contexts: An `HIV and AIDS´ Case Study -- 1 Putting Science Out of Place -- 2 Mainstream Science, Alternative Narratives, and (Mis)Communication -- 3 Accepting Pluralism: Moving from Mystification to Argumentation -- 4 Reliance on Scientific Evidence in Tort Litigation and Criminal Trials. Can Judges Establish How to Distinguish `Science´ fr... -- 5 The Use of Phylogenetic Analysis in Prosecutions for Sexual Transmission -- 6 Improving Scientific Communication and Public Understanding of Science (Concluding Remarks) -- References -- Reproductive Rights in Italy -- 1 Self-determination in Reproductive Rights: Contraception and Sterilisation -- 1.1 Contraception -- 1.2 Sterilisation -- 2 Abortion -- 3 The Debate on Abortion and Wrongful Life -- 4 The Law on Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Judicial Reshaping -- 5 Reproductive Rights and Conscientious Objection -- References -- End of Life Issues -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Emergence of Legal Issues Concerning the End of Life -- 3 The European Standard of Minima, Between Silence and Integration -- 4 Diversity of National Options: Denial v. Integration. ; 4.1 Belgium -- 4.2 England and Wales -- 4.3 France -- 4.4 Spain -- 4.5 Switzerland -- 4.6 The Netherlands -- 5 The Right to One´s Own Death -- 6 The Right to One´s Own Death As a Constitutional and a Public Authorities´ Matter -- 7 And the Future -- References -- Patients´ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis from Biolaw´s Perspective -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Biolaw and Axiological Pluralism -- 3 Analysis of the Law No. 20.584 Applied to the Case -- 3.1 Legislative Design Problems: A Protectionist Model -- 3.2 Problems of Legislative Technique: A Model of Protected Self-determination -- 3.3 Problems of Non-jurisdictional Institutional Pluralism -- 4 The Case -- 5 Jurisprudential Analysis from a Biolaw´s Perspective -- 5.1 A Restricted Judicial Discretion -- 5.2 Judicial Proceedings Against a Protectionist Model of Autonomy -- 6 Conclusions -- References.
• Titolo autorizzato: Axiological pluralism
• ISBN: 3-030-78475-4
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Record Nr.: 9910497084603321
• Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
• Serie: Ius gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ; ; Volume 92.