{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":27,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":27,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[24,2,24,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910497084603321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Axiological Pluralism : Jurisdiction, Law-Making and Pluralisms / / edited by Lucia Busatta, Carlo Casonato"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-030-78475-4"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 2021.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (253 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, , 2214-9902 ; ; 92"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"344.041"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Medical laws and legislation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Private international law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Conflict of laws"]
[{"$nulls":4},"International law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Comparative law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Ethics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Law - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Law - History"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Medical Law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Part 1. Adjudication and Regulation Facing Pluralisms: Models And Trend -- Perspectives -- BioLaw facing pluralisms: three simple models for complex issues -- Some patterns for “scientific adjudication”: the role of courts in reconciling axiological pluralism and scientific complexity -- Part 2: Accommodating Pluralisms Beyond Courts?: Institutions and Tools -- Research Ethics Committees -- Consultative boards at international level -- Reckoning with growing pluralism. Potentials and limits of conscientious objection: Conscience clauses in abortion laws in Europe -- Professional (medical) ethics -- Part 3. Case Studies -- Axiological Pluralism: Conflict in the Hospital, Resolution in the Courts -- Moral pluralism and health claims as a challenge for the democratic principle. The cases of non validated therapies and "]
[{"$nulls":4},"vaccinations -- Reliance on Scientific Claims in Social and Legal Contexts: An ‘HIV and AIDS’ Case Study -- Reproductive Rights -- End of life issues -- Patient’s rights at the end of lifein Chilean legal system. Legal and jurisprudential analysis from a biolaw’s perspective."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book analyses the features and functionality of the relationship between the law, individual or collective values and medical-scientific evidence when they have to be interpreted by judges, courts and para-jurisdictional bodies. The various degrees to which scientific data and moral values have been integrated into the legal discourse reveal the need for a systematic review of the options and solutions that judges have elaborated on. In turn, the book presents a systematic approach, based on a proposed pattern for classifying these various degrees, together with an in-depth analysis of the multi-layered role of jurisdictions and the means available to them for properly handling new legal demands arising in plural societies. The book outlines a model that makes it possible to focus on and address these issues in a sustainable manner, that is, to respond to individual requests and technological advances in the field of biolaw by consistently and effectively applying suitable legal instruments and jurisdictional interpretation."]