Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Mikhailov Oleg V Visualizza persona
Titolo: Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Basel, : MDPI Books, 2022
Descrizione fisica: 1 electronic resource (128 p.)
Soggetto topico: Humanities
Social interaction
Soggetto non controllato: conference indicator
conference impact factor
conference accreditation
bibliometric measure
scientometrics
scientometric indicators
Russian professors
sociological polls
scientometric politics
scientometric indexes
scholarly publications
scientific contribution of individual
author-suggested weighted citation index
bibliometric
human capital
universities
trends
higher education
citation analysis
emerging country
Kazakhstan
Lotka's law
network analysis
publication trend
research productivity
scientific activity
technology assessment
research collaboration
patent analysis
bibliometric indicators
sustainable development goals
systematic review
meta-analysis
academic surgery
Persona (resp. second.): MikhailovOleg V
Sommario/riassunto: As is known, an objective assessment of scientific activity is one of the most difficult problems, in terms of the relationship within itself as well as with society. However, for many decades, the significance of scientists’ contribution to the development of the corresponding branch of science was assessed by the scientific community only by meaningful qualitative criteria, wherein the principle and mechanism of such an assessment was actually intuitive and defied quantitative description. That is why the urgent task was undertaken to create a system for evaluating scientific activity based on some objective indicators of the activity of a particular scientist; in search of such criteria, in the 1970s–1980s, the term “citation index” appeared. Although a close examination of this indicator revealed its limitations and in a number of cases even inadequacy in assessing scientific activity, it has nevertheless since the 1990s gained very wide popularity in the scientific community. This has contributed to the emergence of numerous works aimed at finding new and ideal indicators for assessing publication activity (so-called bibliometric indices). To date, several dozen such indices have been proposed, the most significant of which was the so-called Hirsch index or h-index. Nevertheless, despite the incredibly significant advances in this specific area of sociology, the above problem is still far from resolved. In this regard, the key task of this Special Issue is to familiarize its readers with the latest achievements both in the search for new, more advanced bibliometric indicators and in the improvement of existing ones.
Titolo autorizzato: Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity  Visualizza cluster
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910595074403321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui