Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures [[electronic resource] ] : Does Mareva Rule the Waves? / / by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Tajti Tibor Visualizza persona
Titolo: A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures [[electronic resource] ] : Does Mareva Rule the Waves? / / by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2018
Edizione: 1st ed. 2018.
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (100 pages)
Disciplina: 347.41077
Soggetto topico: Private international law
Conflict of laws
Commercial law
Law—Europe
International law
Trade
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
Business Law
European Law
International Economic Law, Trade Law
Persona (resp. second.): IglikowskiPeter
Nota di contenuto: Introduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.
Sommario/riassunto: This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the “age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth” has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the ‘Freezing Order’ in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.
Titolo autorizzato: A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 3-319-94349-9
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910299866003321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui
Serie: SpringerBriefs in Law, . 2192-855X