LEADER 03935nam  22006375  450 
001 9910299866003321
005 20200706020738.0
010   $a3-319-94349-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7
035   $a(CKB)3810000000358748
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5450462
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-94349-7
035   $a(PPN)229495915
035   $a(EXLCZ)993810000000358748
100   $a20180616d2018      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 12$aA Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures$b[electronic resource] $eDoes Mareva Rule the Waves? /$fby Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (100 pages)
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-855X
311   $a3-319-94348-0 
327   $aIntroduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.
330   $aThis book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the ?age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth? has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the ?Freezing Order? in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-855X
606   $aPrivate international law
606   $aConflict of laws
606   $aCommercial law
606   $aLaw?Europe
606   $aInternational law
606   $aTrade
606   $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002
606   $aBusiness Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/529000
606   $aEuropean Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
615  0$aPrivate international law.
615  0$aConflict of laws.
615  0$aCommercial law.
615  0$aLaw?Europe.
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aTrade.
615 14$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
615 24$aBusiness Law.
615 24$aEuropean Law.
615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
676   $a347.41077
700   $aTajti$b Tibor$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0799264
702   $aIglikowski$b Peter$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910299866003321
996   $aA Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures$92204582
997   $aUNINA