Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy : Jerusalem and Northern Ireland / / Stacie E. Goddard [[electronic resource]]



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Goddard Stacie E. <1974-> Visualizza persona
Titolo: Indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy : Jerusalem and Northern Ireland / / Stacie E. Goddard [[electronic resource]] Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2010
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (ix, 294 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
Disciplina: 941.5082/1
Soggetto topico: Nationalism - Northern Ireland
Political violence - Northern Ireland
Rhetoric - Political aspects - Northern Ireland
Nationalism - Jerusalem
Political violence - Jerusalem
Rhetoric - Political aspects - Jerusalem
Partition, Territorial
Soggetto geografico: Ireland History Partition, 1921
Jerusalem History Partition, 1948
Note generali: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: 1. Introduction -- 2. Constructing Indivisibility : A Legitimation Theory of Indivisible Territory -- 3. Home Rule : A Divisible Ireland -- 4. "Ulster Will Fight" : The Orange Card and an Indivisible Ireland -- 5. Dividing the Holy City -- 6. Jerusalem, Indivisible -- 7. How Northern Ireland Became Divisible (and Why Jerusalem Has Not) -- 8. Conclusion.
Sommario/riassunto: In Jerusalem and Northern Ireland, territorial disputes have often seemed indivisible, unable to be solved through negotiation, and prone to violence and war. This book challenges the conventional wisdom that these conflicts were the inevitable result of clashing identities, religions, and attachments to the land. On the contrary, it was radical political rhetoric, and not ancient hatreds, that rendered these territories indivisible. Stacie Goddard traces the roots of territorial indivisibility to politicians' strategies for legitimating their claims to territory. When bargaining over territory, politicians utilize rhetoric to appeal to their domestic audiences and undercut the claims of their opponents. However, this strategy has unintended consequences; by resonating with some coalitions and appearing unacceptable to others, politicians' rhetoric can lock them into positions in which they are unable to recognize the legitimacy of their opponent's demands. As a result, politicians come to negotiations with incompatible claims, constructing territory as indivisible.
Altri titoli varianti: Indivisible Territory & the Politics of Legitimacy
Titolo autorizzato: Indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-511-69966-2
1-107-20582-4
1-282-33668-1
9786612336683
0-511-63508-7
0-511-63293-2
0-511-63464-1
0-511-63172-3
0-511-63413-7
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910455077703321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui