Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

The nature and authority of precedent / / Neil Duxbury [[electronic resource]]



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Duxbury Neil Visualizza persona
Titolo: The nature and authority of precedent / / Neil Duxbury [[electronic resource]] Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2008
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (xv, 189 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
Disciplina: 340.11
Soggetto topico: Stare decisis
Judicial process
Stare decisis - Great Brtiain
Judicial process - Great Britain
Note generali: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: pt. I. Introduction: the usable past. Precedent ; Positivism and precedent ; A theory of precedent? -- pt. II. Why does English law have a doctrine of precedent?. The formation of a doctrine of precedent -- pt. III. Precedents as reasons. Looking for a certain ratio ; Shortcuts to reason ; Pre-emptive precedent? ; Conclusion -- pt. IV. Distinguishing, overruling and the problem of self-reference. Distinguishing ; Overruling ; The power to overrule oneself ; The authority of the practice statement -- pt. V. Why follow precedent?. Consequentialist justifications ; Deontological arguments ; Conclusion.
Sommario/riassunto: Neil Duxbury examines how precedents constrain legal decision-makers and how legal decision-makers relax and avoid those constraints. There is no single principle or theory which explains the authority of precedent but rather a number of arguments which raise rebuttable presumptions in favour of precedent-following. This book examines the force and the limitations of these arguments and shows that although the principal requirement of the doctrine of precedent is that courts respect earlier judicial decisions on materially identical facts, the doctrine also requires courts to depart from such decisions when following them would perpetuate legal error or injustice. Not only do judicial precedents not 'bind' judges in the classical-positivist sense, but, were they to do so, they would be ill suited to common-law decision-making. Combining historical inquiry and philosophical analysis, this book will assist anyone seeking to understand how precedent operates as a common-law doctrine.
Altri titoli varianti: The Nature & Authority of Precedent
Titolo autorizzato: The nature and authority of precedent  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 1-107-18658-7
1-281-37057-6
9786611370572
0-511-39419-5
0-511-39484-5
0-511-39211-7
0-511-39088-2
0-511-81868-8
0-511-39342-3
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910451383603321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui