Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? [[electronic resource] ] : A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules / / edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter
| Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? [[electronic resource] ] : A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules / / edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter |
| Autore | Gless Sabine |
| Edizione | [1st ed. 2019.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham, : Springer Nature, 2019 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.) |
| Disciplina |
340.9
340.2 |
| Collana | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice |
| Soggetto topico |
Exclusionary rule (Evidence)
Fair trial Conflict of laws International criminal law Criminal law Criminal justice, Administration of Social justice Human rights Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law International Criminal Law Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law Criminal Justice Social Justice, Equality and Human Rights |
| Soggetto non controllato |
Law
Private international law Conflict of laws International criminal law Criminal law Criminal justice, Administration of Social justice Human rights |
| ISBN | 3-030-12520-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910337832703321 |
Gless Sabine
|
||
| Cham, : Springer Nature, 2019 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Multi-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology [[electronic resource] ] : Insights on Innovation, Patents and Competition / / edited by Ashish Bharadwaj, Vishwas H. Devaiah, Indranath Gupta
| Multi-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology [[electronic resource] ] : Insights on Innovation, Patents and Competition / / edited by Ashish Bharadwaj, Vishwas H. Devaiah, Indranath Gupta |
| Autore | Bharadwaj Ashish |
| Edizione | [1st ed. 2018.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Singapore, : Springer Nature, 2018 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (XXV, 337 p. 13 illus., 4 illus. in color.) |
| Disciplina | 343.099 |
| Soggetto topico |
Mass media
Law Conflict of laws Law and economics Economic policy Management Industrial management IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law Law and Economics R & D/Technology Policy Innovation/Technology Management |
| Soggetto non controllato |
Law
Mass media Private international law Conflict of laws Law and economics Economic policy Management Industrial management |
| ISBN | 981-13-1232-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Introduction -- 1. Unwired Planet v. Huawei: Major Progress in Putting “FRAND” into FRAND Licensing -- 2. The Role of the European Commission in the Development of the ETSI IPR Policy and the nature of FRAND in Standardization -- Blockchain Technology in Aid of Trademark Protection -- Understanding the Nuances in the Interplay Between IPRs and Competition Law -- Do Strategic Actions Speak Louder Than Words? A Framework to Formulate a National IP Policy -- The Development and Theoretical Controversy of SEP Licensing Practices in China -- The Interaction Between IP and Competition Laws in the EU: Necessity of Convergent Interpretation with the Principles Established by Relevant Case Law -- IP, patents and competition law in Australia -- Regulating Abuse of SEPs in Mobile Communications Market: Reviewing the Qualcomm Cases in Korea -- “Predatory” patent practices: A telecom perspective -- The Demographics of Intellectual Property -- Innovation, economic value and welfare implications of digital economy -- Market competition and IP infringement in the solar off-grid sector -- Innovation and Intellectual Property: Perspectives from Indian Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) -- When Competition Agencies Harm Competition: Essential Patents -- Antitrust Economics in the New Digital Economy -- Standard Essential Patents vis-à-vis IPR and Competition Law in India – Is there a Regulatory Overlap? -- Classic Theory of Tort Liability and Infringement of SEPs: A Law and Economics Approach -- A shift in the perception of SDO role and policy, and the impact on SEPs, FRAND licensing, and standard setting processes -- How Should Antitrust Law Account for Innovation as an Aspect of Competitive Analysis? -- Competition Law and Standard Essential Patent (SEP) in India: Reminiscences of a Commissioner -- Interplay of competition and IPR elements: Case of the payment and settlement systems market in India. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910299863103321 |
|
Bharadwaj Ashish
|
||
| Singapore, : Springer Nature, 2018 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Subsidiaritätsgrundsatz und Tatsachenfeststellung Unter der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention : Analyse der Rechtsprechung Zu Art. 3 EMRK
| Subsidiaritätsgrundsatz und Tatsachenfeststellung Unter der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention : Analyse der Rechtsprechung Zu Art. 3 EMRK |
| Autore | Brunner Arthur |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, , 2019 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (XVI, 188 S. 4 Abb.) |
| Disciplina | 341.48 |
| Collana | Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht |
| Soggetto topico |
Human rights
Law—Europe Social justice International criminal law Conflict of laws Human Rights European Law Social Justice, Equality and Human Rights International Criminal Law Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law |
| Soggetto non controllato |
Law
Human rights Law—Europe Social justice International criminal law Private international law Conflict of laws |
| ISBN | 3-662-58887-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | ger |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910372751303321 |
|
Brunner Arthur
|
||
| Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, , 2019 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||