Info
Multidimensional journal evaluation [[electronic resource] ] : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor / / Stefanie Haustein
| Multidimensional journal evaluation [[electronic resource] ] : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor / / Stefanie Haustein |
| Autore | Haustein Stefanie |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berlin, : De Gruyter Saur, 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (416 p.) |
| Disciplina | 505 |
| Collana | Knowledge & information |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Bibliometrics |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-280-57004-0
9786613599643 3-11-025555-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Journal Output -- Chapter 3. Journal Content -- Chapter 4. Journal Perception and Usage -- Chapter 5. Journal Citations -- Chapter 6. Journal Management -- Chapter 7. Conclusions and Outlook -- List of Abbreviations -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Author Index -- Subject Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910452096103321 |
Haustein Stefanie
|
||
| Berlin, : De Gruyter Saur, 2012 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Multidimensional journal evaluation [[electronic resource] ] : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor / / Stefanie Haustein
| Multidimensional journal evaluation [[electronic resource] ] : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor / / Stefanie Haustein |
| Autore | Haustein Stefanie |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berlin, : De Gruyter Saur, 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (416 p.) |
| Disciplina | 505 |
| Collana | Knowledge & information |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Bibliometrics |
| Soggetto non controllato |
Evaluation
Journal |
| ISBN |
1-280-57004-0
9786613599643 3-11-025555-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Journal Output -- Chapter 3. Journal Content -- Chapter 4. Journal Perception and Usage -- Chapter 5. Journal Citations -- Chapter 6. Journal Management -- Chapter 7. Conclusions and Outlook -- List of Abbreviations -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Author Index -- Subject Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910779174503321 |
|
Haustein Stefanie
|
||
| Berlin, : De Gruyter Saur, 2012 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Disciplina | 070.4495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Science - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis Peer review Science - United States - Information services |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-281-32205-9
9786611322052 0-470-75080-4 0-470-75026-X |
| Classificazione | 02.13 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice; Contents; Foreword by Robert Campbell and Sally Morris; Preface; Chapter 1: Introduction; What should peer review do?; What does peer review assume?; What is this book trying to achieve?; Chapter 2: The peer-review process - how to get going; The basic process; The people involved in running the peer-review process; Office organization; Choice of system and procedures; Record keeping; Systems available; Chapter 3: Manuscript submission and initial checks on completeness and suitability
Submission guidance to authorsJournal scope and editorial policy; Manuscript presentation; Manuscript submission; Checking and logging of submitted manuscripts; Transfer to editor; Initial assessment of suitability and rejection without external review; Manuscripts with language problems; Chapter 4: The full review process; Identifying and selecting appropriate reviewers; Reviewer information; How to go about identifying and selecting reviewers; Finding reviewers; To invite or not?; Inviting reviewers; Responses to invitations to review Getting the manuscript and associated material to the reviewersInformation reviewers will require; Associated material needed by reviewers; Monitoring review progress; Reminding and chasing reviewers; Problems during review; Reviewers not returning reviews; Receiving and checking of returned reviews; Checking of reviews; The ethics of amending reviewer reports for authors; The 'ideal' report; Back-to-back manuscripts; Dealing with enquiries on manuscript status; Chapter 5: The decision-making process for reviewed manuscripts; The organizational structure for decision making The decision-making processDivided opinions from reviewers; The decisions that can be made; Checks to be made before communicating decisions to authors; Communicating the decision to the authors; Rebuttals and appeals from authors; Dealing with revisions; Dealing with resubmissions; Problems with resubmissions; Acceptance; Decision making to consistent standards and the problem of availability of space; Special considerations in decision making: dual-use research and the possible misuse of information; Chapter 6: Moving to online submission and review; How do you choose an online system? How to prepare to move to online workingEvaluation of current workflow and responsibilities; Specification design for the journal; Questions and text options on the site; Preparation of editorial correspondence for the online site; Health and safety issues; Training and support; Data transfer; The launch and transition period; What to expect after going live online; Impact on submission numbers; Impact on the quality of submissions; Impact on geographical origin of submissions; Impact on reviewing and administration times; Problems that may be encountered and how to deal with them Online systems are never closed |
| Record Nr. | UNISA-996218284703316 |
|
Hames Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. di Salerno | ||
| ||
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Disciplina | 070.4495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Science - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis Peer review Science - United States - Information services |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-281-32205-9
9786611322052 0-470-75080-4 0-470-75026-X |
| Classificazione | 02.13 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice; Contents; Foreword by Robert Campbell and Sally Morris; Preface; Chapter 1: Introduction; What should peer review do?; What does peer review assume?; What is this book trying to achieve?; Chapter 2: The peer-review process - how to get going; The basic process; The people involved in running the peer-review process; Office organization; Choice of system and procedures; Record keeping; Systems available; Chapter 3: Manuscript submission and initial checks on completeness and suitability
Submission guidance to authorsJournal scope and editorial policy; Manuscript presentation; Manuscript submission; Checking and logging of submitted manuscripts; Transfer to editor; Initial assessment of suitability and rejection without external review; Manuscripts with language problems; Chapter 4: The full review process; Identifying and selecting appropriate reviewers; Reviewer information; How to go about identifying and selecting reviewers; Finding reviewers; To invite or not?; Inviting reviewers; Responses to invitations to review Getting the manuscript and associated material to the reviewersInformation reviewers will require; Associated material needed by reviewers; Monitoring review progress; Reminding and chasing reviewers; Problems during review; Reviewers not returning reviews; Receiving and checking of returned reviews; Checking of reviews; The ethics of amending reviewer reports for authors; The 'ideal' report; Back-to-back manuscripts; Dealing with enquiries on manuscript status; Chapter 5: The decision-making process for reviewed manuscripts; The organizational structure for decision making The decision-making processDivided opinions from reviewers; The decisions that can be made; Checks to be made before communicating decisions to authors; Communicating the decision to the authors; Rebuttals and appeals from authors; Dealing with revisions; Dealing with resubmissions; Problems with resubmissions; Acceptance; Decision making to consistent standards and the problem of availability of space; Special considerations in decision making: dual-use research and the possible misuse of information; Chapter 6: Moving to online submission and review; How do you choose an online system? How to prepare to move to online workingEvaluation of current workflow and responsibilities; Specification design for the journal; Questions and text options on the site; Preparation of editorial correspondence for the online site; Health and safety issues; Training and support; Data transfer; The launch and transition period; What to expect after going live online; Impact on submission numbers; Impact on the quality of submissions; Impact on geographical origin of submissions; Impact on reviewing and administration times; Problems that may be encountered and how to deal with them Online systems are never closed |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910145306703321 |
|
Hames Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals [[electronic resource] ] : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Disciplina | 070.4495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Science - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis Peer review Science - United States - Information services |
| ISBN |
1-281-32205-9
9786611322052 0-470-75080-4 0-470-75026-X |
| Classificazione | 02.13 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice; Contents; Foreword by Robert Campbell and Sally Morris; Preface; Chapter 1: Introduction; What should peer review do?; What does peer review assume?; What is this book trying to achieve?; Chapter 2: The peer-review process - how to get going; The basic process; The people involved in running the peer-review process; Office organization; Choice of system and procedures; Record keeping; Systems available; Chapter 3: Manuscript submission and initial checks on completeness and suitability
Submission guidance to authorsJournal scope and editorial policy; Manuscript presentation; Manuscript submission; Checking and logging of submitted manuscripts; Transfer to editor; Initial assessment of suitability and rejection without external review; Manuscripts with language problems; Chapter 4: The full review process; Identifying and selecting appropriate reviewers; Reviewer information; How to go about identifying and selecting reviewers; Finding reviewers; To invite or not?; Inviting reviewers; Responses to invitations to review Getting the manuscript and associated material to the reviewersInformation reviewers will require; Associated material needed by reviewers; Monitoring review progress; Reminding and chasing reviewers; Problems during review; Reviewers not returning reviews; Receiving and checking of returned reviews; Checking of reviews; The ethics of amending reviewer reports for authors; The 'ideal' report; Back-to-back manuscripts; Dealing with enquiries on manuscript status; Chapter 5: The decision-making process for reviewed manuscripts; The organizational structure for decision making The decision-making processDivided opinions from reviewers; The decisions that can be made; Checks to be made before communicating decisions to authors; Communicating the decision to the authors; Rebuttals and appeals from authors; Dealing with revisions; Dealing with resubmissions; Problems with resubmissions; Acceptance; Decision making to consistent standards and the problem of availability of space; Special considerations in decision making: dual-use research and the possible misuse of information; Chapter 6: Moving to online submission and review; How do you choose an online system? How to prepare to move to online workingEvaluation of current workflow and responsibilities; Specification design for the journal; Questions and text options on the site; Preparation of editorial correspondence for the online site; Health and safety issues; Training and support; Data transfer; The launch and transition period; What to expect after going live online; Impact on submission numbers; Impact on the quality of submissions; Impact on geographical origin of submissions; Impact on reviewing and administration times; Problems that may be encountered and how to deal with them Online systems are never closed |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910830145603321 |
|
Hames Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Disciplina | 070.4/495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Science - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis Peer review Science - United States - Information services Avaluació d'experts Literatura científica Revistes Redacció d'escrits tècnics |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Llibres electrònics |
| ISBN |
9786611322052
9781281322050 1281322059 9780470750803 0470750804 9780470750261 047075026X |
| Classificazione | 02.13 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice; Contents; Foreword by Robert Campbell and Sally Morris; Preface; Chapter 1: Introduction; What should peer review do?; What does peer review assume?; What is this book trying to achieve?; Chapter 2: The peer-review process - how to get going; The basic process; The people involved in running the peer-review process; Office organization; Choice of system and procedures; Record keeping; Systems available; Chapter 3: Manuscript submission and initial checks on completeness and suitability
Submission guidance to authorsJournal scope and editorial policy; Manuscript presentation; Manuscript submission; Checking and logging of submitted manuscripts; Transfer to editor; Initial assessment of suitability and rejection without external review; Manuscripts with language problems; Chapter 4: The full review process; Identifying and selecting appropriate reviewers; Reviewer information; How to go about identifying and selecting reviewers; Finding reviewers; To invite or not?; Inviting reviewers; Responses to invitations to review Getting the manuscript and associated material to the reviewersInformation reviewers will require; Associated material needed by reviewers; Monitoring review progress; Reminding and chasing reviewers; Problems during review; Reviewers not returning reviews; Receiving and checking of returned reviews; Checking of reviews; The ethics of amending reviewer reports for authors; The 'ideal' report; Back-to-back manuscripts; Dealing with enquiries on manuscript status; Chapter 5: The decision-making process for reviewed manuscripts; The organizational structure for decision making The decision-making processDivided opinions from reviewers; The decisions that can be made; Checks to be made before communicating decisions to authors; Communicating the decision to the authors; Rebuttals and appeals from authors; Dealing with revisions; Dealing with resubmissions; Problems with resubmissions; Acceptance; Decision making to consistent standards and the problem of availability of space; Special considerations in decision making: dual-use research and the possible misuse of information; Chapter 6: Moving to online submission and review; How do you choose an online system? How to prepare to move to online workingEvaluation of current workflow and responsibilities; Specification design for the journal; Questions and text options on the site; Preparation of editorial correspondence for the online site; Health and safety issues; Training and support; Data transfer; The launch and transition period; What to expect after going live online; Impact on submission numbers; Impact on the quality of submissions; Impact on geographical origin of submissions; Impact on reviewing and administration times; Problems that may be encountered and how to deal with them Online systems are never closed |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9911019252703321 |
|
Hames Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames, Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; Oxford : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | xii, 293 p. : ill. ; 25 cm |
| Disciplina | 070.4495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis |
| ISBN | 9781405131599 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNISALENTO-991000394929707536 |
|
Hames, Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; Oxford : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. del Salento | ||
| ||
Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [[electronic resource] ] : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council
| Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [[electronic resource] ] : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 2000 |
| Descrizione fisica | xviii, 159 p. : ill |
| Soggetto topico |
Research - Management
Scientific literature - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation Peer review |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-280-18541-4
9786610185412 0-309-56354-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910456359503321 |
| Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 2000 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council
| Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C. : , : National Academy Press, , 2000 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (177 pages) : illustrations |
| Soggetto topico |
Research - Management
Scientific literature - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation Peer review |
| ISBN |
0-309-17176-8
1-280-18541-4 9786610185412 0-309-56354-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910778626003321 |
| Washington, D.C. : , : National Academy Press, , 2000 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council
| Strengthening science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency : research-management and peer-review practices / / Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 2000 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (177 pages) : illustrations |
| Soggetto topico |
Research - Management
Scientific literature - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation Peer review |
| ISBN |
0-309-17176-8
1-280-18541-4 9786610185412 0-309-56354-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Strengthening Science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -- Copyright -- OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY -- Preface -- Contents -- Executive Summary -- SCIENTIFIC LEADERSHIP AND TALENT -- RESEARCH CONTINUITY AND BALANCE -- RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS AND OUTREACH -- RESEARCH ACCOUNTABILITY -- SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW -- 1 Evaluating Science at EPA -- THE ROLE OF SCIENCE AT EPA -- PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS OF SCIENCE AT EPA -- THIS NRC STUDY -- 2 Research Management at EPA -- THE ROLE OF ORD -- THE 1995 REORGANIZATION OF ORD -- RESEARCH PLANNING -- Decision Making -- Dissemination and Technology Transfer -- Research Plans and Strategies -- Accountability -- Strategic Planning -- THE ORD LABORATORIES -- THE ORD CENTERS -- THE SCIENTIFIC WORK FORCE -- Continuity -- Bureaucracy -- Staff Development -- Recruitment -- Leadership -- 3 Peer-Review Practices at EPA -- PURPOSES AND BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW -- LIMITATIONS OF PEER REVIEW -- PEER-REVIEW POLICY DEVELOPMENTS AT EPA -- WHAT DOCUMENTS ARE PEER REVIEWED? -- FORMS AND MECHANISMS OF PEER REVIEW -- SELECTION OF PEER REVIEWERS -- DOCUMENTATION AND RESPONSE TO PEER REVIEWS -- MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF PEER REVIEWS -- 4 Strengthening Science at EPA -- SCIENTIFIC LEADERSHIP AND TALENT -- RESEARCH CONTINUITY AND BALANCE -- RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS AND OUTREACH -- RESEARCH ACCOUNTABILITY -- SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW -- References -- Appendix BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON THE COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND PEER REVIEW IN EPA. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910959950503321 |
| Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 2000 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
