Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans [[electronic resource] ] : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball
| The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans [[electronic resource] ] : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball |
| Autore | Ball Howard <1937-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (278 p.) |
| Disciplina | 344.730419 |
| Soggetto topico |
Human reproduction - Law and legislation - United States - History
Abortion - Law and legislation - United States - History Right to die - Law and legislation - United States - History |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
0-8147-2301-2
1-4175-8813-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. “Fundamental” Rights versus State Interests -- I. “I Am Not Talking Very Much Like a Lawyer” -- II. The U.S. Supreme Court and “Fundamental” Rights -- III. The Liberty and Rights Protected by the Due Process Clause -- Case Study: U.S. v Carolene Products, 1938, Footnote 4³⁶ -- IV. Is There a Protected Liberty Interest for Persons Having Intimate Homosexual Relations? -- Case Study: Bowers v Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)⁵º -- Case Study: Roy Romer, Governor v Richard Evans, et al., 1996⁵⁴ -- V. The Limits of Sexual Privacy -- VI. Summing Up -- 2. Marriage and Marital Privacy -- I. “I Should Like to Suggest a Substantial Change for Your Consideration” -- II. Heterosexual Marriage -- Case Study: Skinner v Oklahoma, 1942⁴¹ -- III. Molecular Changes in the Definition and Reality of the Traditional Marital Relationship -- Case Study: Griswold v Connecticut, 1965⁵º -- IV. The Dilemma of Intimate Violence and Congressional Passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1994 -- Case Study: Joshua DeShaney, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, et al., v Winnebago County, Wisconsin Department of Social Services, et al., 1988⁵⁹ -- Case Study: U.S. v Morrison, 1999⁷⁵ -- V. Same-Sex Marriage -- Case Study: Stan Baker, et al. v State of Vermont, et al., 1999⁹⁴ -- VI. Congressional Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1996 -- Case Study: Nina Baehr v Miike, 1996, 1999¹º³ -- VII. Summing Up -- 3. The “Rhapsody of the Unitary Family”¹ -- I. “Something Smells about This Case” -- II. Who Is Family? -- Case Study: Village of Belle Terre v. Bruce Boraas, 1974²³ -- III. Family Privacy Rights versus State Interests -- Case Study: Reynolds v U.S., 1878²⁸ -- Case Study: Michael H. v Gerald D., 1989 -- IV. Family Privacy Rights versus Personal Autonomy and Other Constitutional Rights -- Case Study: Eisenstadt v Baird, 1971 -- V. Summing Up -- 4. Motherhood or Not, That Is Her Decision -- I. “I Will Be God-damned!”³ -- II. Not Having Children: Abortion as Personal Right -- Case Study: Roe v Wade, 1972¹¹ -- III. After Roe, What Are the Limits of “State Actions” That Regulate the Abortion Procedure? -- Case Study: Webster v Reproductive Health Services, 1989 -- IV. After Roe, What Are a Husband’s Rights? -- Case Study: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 1992 -- VI. Back into the Vortex: The “Partial Birth” Abortion Controversy -- Case Study: Stenberg v Carhart, 1999 -- VII. Summing Up -- 5. Raising the Child “Father Knows Best”? |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910450209703321 |
Ball Howard <1937->
|
||
| New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans [[electronic resource] ] : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball
| The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans [[electronic resource] ] : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball |
| Autore | Ball Howard <1937-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (278 p.) |
| Disciplina | 344.730419 |
| Soggetto topico |
Human reproduction - Law and legislation - United States - History
Abortion - Law and legislation - United States - History Right to die - Law and legislation - United States - History |
| ISBN |
0-8147-2301-2
1-4175-8813-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. “Fundamental” Rights versus State Interests -- I. “I Am Not Talking Very Much Like a Lawyer” -- II. The U.S. Supreme Court and “Fundamental” Rights -- III. The Liberty and Rights Protected by the Due Process Clause -- Case Study: U.S. v Carolene Products, 1938, Footnote 4³⁶ -- IV. Is There a Protected Liberty Interest for Persons Having Intimate Homosexual Relations? -- Case Study: Bowers v Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)⁵º -- Case Study: Roy Romer, Governor v Richard Evans, et al., 1996⁵⁴ -- V. The Limits of Sexual Privacy -- VI. Summing Up -- 2. Marriage and Marital Privacy -- I. “I Should Like to Suggest a Substantial Change for Your Consideration” -- II. Heterosexual Marriage -- Case Study: Skinner v Oklahoma, 1942⁴¹ -- III. Molecular Changes in the Definition and Reality of the Traditional Marital Relationship -- Case Study: Griswold v Connecticut, 1965⁵º -- IV. The Dilemma of Intimate Violence and Congressional Passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1994 -- Case Study: Joshua DeShaney, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, et al., v Winnebago County, Wisconsin Department of Social Services, et al., 1988⁵⁹ -- Case Study: U.S. v Morrison, 1999⁷⁵ -- V. Same-Sex Marriage -- Case Study: Stan Baker, et al. v State of Vermont, et al., 1999⁹⁴ -- VI. Congressional Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1996 -- Case Study: Nina Baehr v Miike, 1996, 1999¹º³ -- VII. Summing Up -- 3. The “Rhapsody of the Unitary Family”¹ -- I. “Something Smells about This Case” -- II. Who Is Family? -- Case Study: Village of Belle Terre v. Bruce Boraas, 1974²³ -- III. Family Privacy Rights versus State Interests -- Case Study: Reynolds v U.S., 1878²⁸ -- Case Study: Michael H. v Gerald D., 1989 -- IV. Family Privacy Rights versus Personal Autonomy and Other Constitutional Rights -- Case Study: Eisenstadt v Baird, 1971 -- V. Summing Up -- 4. Motherhood or Not, That Is Her Decision -- I. “I Will Be God-damned!”³ -- II. Not Having Children: Abortion as Personal Right -- Case Study: Roe v Wade, 1972¹¹ -- III. After Roe, What Are the Limits of “State Actions” That Regulate the Abortion Procedure? -- Case Study: Webster v Reproductive Health Services, 1989 -- IV. After Roe, What Are a Husband’s Rights? -- Case Study: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 1992 -- VI. Back into the Vortex: The “Partial Birth” Abortion Controversy -- Case Study: Stenberg v Carhart, 1999 -- VII. Summing Up -- 5. Raising the Child “Father Knows Best”? |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910783259303321 |
|
Ball Howard <1937->
|
||
| New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball
| The Supreme Court in the intimate lives of Americans : birth, sex, marriage, childrearing, and death / / Howard Ball |
| Autore | Ball Howard <1937-> |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (278 p.) |
| Disciplina | 344.730419 |
| Soggetto topico |
Human reproduction - Law and legislation - United States - History
Abortion - Law and legislation - United States - History Right to die - Law and legislation - United States - History |
| ISBN |
0-8147-2301-2
1-4175-8813-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. “Fundamental” Rights versus State Interests -- I. “I Am Not Talking Very Much Like a Lawyer” -- II. The U.S. Supreme Court and “Fundamental” Rights -- III. The Liberty and Rights Protected by the Due Process Clause -- Case Study: U.S. v Carolene Products, 1938, Footnote 4³⁶ -- IV. Is There a Protected Liberty Interest for Persons Having Intimate Homosexual Relations? -- Case Study: Bowers v Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)⁵º -- Case Study: Roy Romer, Governor v Richard Evans, et al., 1996⁵⁴ -- V. The Limits of Sexual Privacy -- VI. Summing Up -- 2. Marriage and Marital Privacy -- I. “I Should Like to Suggest a Substantial Change for Your Consideration” -- II. Heterosexual Marriage -- Case Study: Skinner v Oklahoma, 1942⁴¹ -- III. Molecular Changes in the Definition and Reality of the Traditional Marital Relationship -- Case Study: Griswold v Connecticut, 1965⁵º -- IV. The Dilemma of Intimate Violence and Congressional Passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1994 -- Case Study: Joshua DeShaney, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, et al., v Winnebago County, Wisconsin Department of Social Services, et al., 1988⁵⁹ -- Case Study: U.S. v Morrison, 1999⁷⁵ -- V. Same-Sex Marriage -- Case Study: Stan Baker, et al. v State of Vermont, et al., 1999⁹⁴ -- VI. Congressional Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1996 -- Case Study: Nina Baehr v Miike, 1996, 1999¹º³ -- VII. Summing Up -- 3. The “Rhapsody of the Unitary Family”¹ -- I. “Something Smells about This Case” -- II. Who Is Family? -- Case Study: Village of Belle Terre v. Bruce Boraas, 1974²³ -- III. Family Privacy Rights versus State Interests -- Case Study: Reynolds v U.S., 1878²⁸ -- Case Study: Michael H. v Gerald D., 1989 -- IV. Family Privacy Rights versus Personal Autonomy and Other Constitutional Rights -- Case Study: Eisenstadt v Baird, 1971 -- V. Summing Up -- 4. Motherhood or Not, That Is Her Decision -- I. “I Will Be God-damned!”³ -- II. Not Having Children: Abortion as Personal Right -- Case Study: Roe v Wade, 1972¹¹ -- III. After Roe, What Are the Limits of “State Actions” That Regulate the Abortion Procedure? -- Case Study: Webster v Reproductive Health Services, 1989 -- IV. After Roe, What Are a Husband’s Rights? -- Case Study: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 1992 -- VI. Back into the Vortex: The “Partial Birth” Abortion Controversy -- Case Study: Stenberg v Carhart, 1999 -- VII. Summing Up -- 5. Raising the Child “Father Knows Best”? |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910820983503321 |
|
Ball Howard <1937->
|
||
| New York ; London, : New York University Press, c2002 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
