Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6403-0
1-281-25865-2 9786611258658 1-84731-375-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910450901603321 |
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6403-0
1-281-25865-2 9786611258658 1-84731-375-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910784725003321 |
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| ISBN |
9786611258658
9781472564030 1472564030 9781281258656 1281258652 9781847313751 1847313752 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9911089811103321 |
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| ISBN |
9786611258658
9781472564030 1472564030 9781281258656 1281258652 9781847313751 1847313752 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9911140047603321 |
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The right to confrontation in Europe [[electronic resource] ] : absent, anonymous, and vulnerable / / Dr. S. Maffei
| The right to confrontation in Europe [[electronic resource] ] : absent, anonymous, and vulnerable / / Dr. S. Maffei |
| Autore | Maffei Stefano |
| Edizione | [Rev. and completely upd. 2nd ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Groningen, : European Law Publishing, 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (295 p.) |
| Disciplina | 300 |
| Soggetto topico |
Due process of law - Europe
Defense (Criminal procedure) - Europe Fair trial - Europe |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 90-8952-131-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
The Right to Confrontation in Europe; The Right to Confrontation in Europe. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses by Dr. S. Maffei. Completely revised and updated second edition; Contents; Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Confrontation of Adverse Witnesses as a Fundamental Right; Chapter 2. Testimonial Evidence and the "Confrontational Paradigm"; Chapter 3. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses; Chapter 4. The Right to Confrontation in European Human Rights Law; Chapter 5. The Foundations of Criminal Evidence in English, Italian and French Law
Chapter 6. The Confrontational Paradigm in Action before English, Italian and French Criminal CourtsChapter 7. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses in English, French and Italian Criminal Procedure; Conclusion; Literature; Cases; Legislation; Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910461802403321 |
Maffei Stefano
|
||
| Groningen, : European Law Publishing, 2012 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The right to confrontation in Europe [[electronic resource] ] : absent, anonymous, and vulnerable / / Dr. S. Maffei
| The right to confrontation in Europe [[electronic resource] ] : absent, anonymous, and vulnerable / / Dr. S. Maffei |
| Autore | Maffei Stefano |
| Edizione | [Rev. and completely upd. 2nd ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Groningen, : European Law Publishing, 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (295 p.) |
| Disciplina | 300 |
| Soggetto topico |
Due process of law - Europe
Defense (Criminal procedure) - Europe Fair trial - Europe |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 90-8952-131-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
The Right to Confrontation in Europe; The Right to Confrontation in Europe. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses by Dr. S. Maffei. Completely revised and updated second edition; Contents; Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Confrontation of Adverse Witnesses as a Fundamental Right; Chapter 2. Testimonial Evidence and the "Confrontational Paradigm"; Chapter 3. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses; Chapter 4. The Right to Confrontation in European Human Rights Law; Chapter 5. The Foundations of Criminal Evidence in English, Italian and French Law
Chapter 6. The Confrontational Paradigm in Action before English, Italian and French Criminal CourtsChapter 7. Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses in English, French and Italian Criminal Procedure; Conclusion; Literature; Cases; Legislation; Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910539885503321 |
Maffei Stefano
|
||
| Groningen, : European Law Publishing, 2012 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||