Corn ethanol [[electronic resource] ] : who pays? who benefits? / / Ken G. Glozer |
Autore | Glozer Ken G |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (243 p.) |
Disciplina | 338.4/766288 |
Collana | Hoover Institution Press publication |
Soggetto topico |
Ethanol as fuel - Government policy - United States
Ethanol as fuel - Economic aspects - United States Ethanol fuel industry - Government policy - United States Ethanol fuel industry - United States Energy policy - United States Energy crops industry - United States Corn industry - United States |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
0-8179-4963-1
0-8179-4968-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover; Book Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures; Preface; Acknowledgments; Part I - Political History; 1. Introduction; 2. Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel: How FederalCorn-Ethanol Policy Evolved; A. Carter Administration, 1977-1981: Jump Starting a New Industry with Tax Incentives, Tariffs, and Financial Support; B. Reagan Administration, 1981-1989: Greater Reliance on Energy Markets; Phase-out of Some Market-Intervention Policies; C. Bush I Administration, 1989-1993: Mandating Reformulated Gasoline and Oxygenates
D. Clinton Administration, 1993-2001: Few Major Initiatives but Continued Production Growth for EthanolE. Bush II Administration, 2001-2009: The Demise of MTBE and Enactment of the Renewable Fuels Standard Bring a Massive Increase in Corn Ethanol Production; Part II - Evaluating Advocates' Policy Claims; 3. Is U.S. Energy Security Strengthened?; 4. Does the Environment Benefit?; 5. Other Claims: Are Budget Costs Reduced? Is the Trade Balance Improved? Is Rural Employment Increased?; 6. Who Pays for the Policy, and Who Benefits from It?; 7. Conclusions; Part III - Supporting Documents A. International Energy Agency, IEA Response System for Oil Supply EmergenciesB. History of World Oil Market Petroleum-supply Interruptions; C. State-by-State Ethanol Subsidies; Endnotes; About the Author; About the Hoover Institution's Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910453390303321 |
Glozer Ken G
![]() |
||
Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Corn ethanol [[electronic resource] ] : who pays? who benefits? / / Ken G. Glozer |
Autore | Glozer Ken G |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (243 p.) |
Disciplina | 338.4/766288 |
Collana | Hoover Institution Press publication |
Soggetto topico |
Ethanol as fuel - Government policy - United States
Ethanol as fuel - Economic aspects - United States Ethanol fuel industry - Government policy - United States Ethanol fuel industry - United States Energy policy - United States Energy crops industry - United States Corn industry - United States |
ISBN |
0-8179-4963-1
0-8179-4968-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover; Book Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures; Preface; Acknowledgments; Part I - Political History; 1. Introduction; 2. Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel: How FederalCorn-Ethanol Policy Evolved; A. Carter Administration, 1977-1981: Jump Starting a New Industry with Tax Incentives, Tariffs, and Financial Support; B. Reagan Administration, 1981-1989: Greater Reliance on Energy Markets; Phase-out of Some Market-Intervention Policies; C. Bush I Administration, 1989-1993: Mandating Reformulated Gasoline and Oxygenates
D. Clinton Administration, 1993-2001: Few Major Initiatives but Continued Production Growth for EthanolE. Bush II Administration, 2001-2009: The Demise of MTBE and Enactment of the Renewable Fuels Standard Bring a Massive Increase in Corn Ethanol Production; Part II - Evaluating Advocates' Policy Claims; 3. Is U.S. Energy Security Strengthened?; 4. Does the Environment Benefit?; 5. Other Claims: Are Budget Costs Reduced? Is the Trade Balance Improved? Is Rural Employment Increased?; 6. Who Pays for the Policy, and Who Benefits from It?; 7. Conclusions; Part III - Supporting Documents A. International Energy Agency, IEA Response System for Oil Supply EmergenciesB. History of World Oil Market Petroleum-supply Interruptions; C. State-by-State Ethanol Subsidies; Endnotes; About the Author; About the Hoover Institution's Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910790862303321 |
Glozer Ken G
![]() |
||
Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Corn ethanol : who pays? who benefits? / / Ken G. Glozer |
Autore | Glozer Ken G |
Edizione | [1st ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (243 p.) |
Disciplina | 338.4/766288 |
Collana | Hoover Institution Press publication |
Soggetto topico |
Ethanol as fuel - Government policy - United States
Ethanol as fuel - Economic aspects - United States Ethanol fuel industry - Government policy - United States Ethanol fuel industry - United States Energy policy - United States Energy crops industry - United States Corn industry - United States |
ISBN |
0-8179-4963-1
0-8179-4968-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover; Book Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures; Preface; Acknowledgments; Part I - Political History; 1. Introduction; 2. Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel: How FederalCorn-Ethanol Policy Evolved; A. Carter Administration, 1977-1981: Jump Starting a New Industry with Tax Incentives, Tariffs, and Financial Support; B. Reagan Administration, 1981-1989: Greater Reliance on Energy Markets; Phase-out of Some Market-Intervention Policies; C. Bush I Administration, 1989-1993: Mandating Reformulated Gasoline and Oxygenates
D. Clinton Administration, 1993-2001: Few Major Initiatives but Continued Production Growth for EthanolE. Bush II Administration, 2001-2009: The Demise of MTBE and Enactment of the Renewable Fuels Standard Bring a Massive Increase in Corn Ethanol Production; Part II - Evaluating Advocates' Policy Claims; 3. Is U.S. Energy Security Strengthened?; 4. Does the Environment Benefit?; 5. Other Claims: Are Budget Costs Reduced? Is the Trade Balance Improved? Is Rural Employment Increased?; 6. Who Pays for the Policy, and Who Benefits from It?; 7. Conclusions; Part III - Supporting Documents A. International Energy Agency, IEA Response System for Oil Supply EmergenciesB. History of World Oil Market Petroleum-supply Interruptions; C. State-by-State Ethanol Subsidies; Endnotes; About the Author; About the Hoover Institution's Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910814936303321 |
Glozer Ken G
![]() |
||
Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, c2011 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|