CSSHE professional file |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Ottawa, : Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education = Société canadienne pour l'étude de l'enseignement supérieur, [1986]- |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource |
Disciplina | 378/.007/071 |
Soggetto topico |
Education, Higher - Study and teaching - Canada - Periodicals
Education, Higher - Research - Canada - Periodicals Enseignement supérieur - Étude et enseignement - Canada - Périodiques Enseignement supérieur - Recherche - Canada - Périodiques Education, Higher - Research Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
Soggetto genere / forma | Periodicals. |
Classificazione | cci1icc |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Periodico |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Altri titoli varianti |
Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education professional file
Dossiers de la SCÉES |
Record Nr. | UNISA-996336478503316 |
Ottawa, : Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education = Société canadienne pour l'étude de l'enseignement supérieur, [1986]- | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. di Salerno | ||
|
Currents in teaching and learning |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Worcester, MA, : Worcester State College, Center for Teaching and Learning |
Disciplina | 378 |
Soggetto topico | Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
Soggetto genere / forma | Periodicals. |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Periodico |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910219901303321 |
Worcester, MA, : Worcester State College, Center for Teaching and Learning | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Enhancing learning and teaching : student feedback in medical and health sciences / / Chenicheri Sid Nair, Patricie Mertova |
Autore | Nair Chenicheri Sid |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 378.125 |
Collana | Chandos Learning and Teaching Series |
Soggetto topico |
Education, Higher - Study and teaching
Medical sciences - Study and teaching (Higher) Student evaluation of curriculum |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
1-78063-433-1
1-84334-752-0 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Cover image; Title page; Table of Contents; Copyright page; List of figures and tables; Preface; Author biographies; 1: Evaluating Student Experiences of Medical Education in the Joint Medical Programme: a Case Study of a Unique Dual University Programme; Abstract; Introduction; Evaluating the learning experience in the JMP: initial cohort 2008-2011; The instruments, their purpose and reflection on performance; Qualitative instruments; Reflections on performance, years 1-3; Closing the loop for students; Issues of dependability, credibility, and trustworthiness; Conclusions; Acknowledgements
2: Using Student Feedback to Enhance Teaching and Learning in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: the University of Hong Kong ExperienceAbstract; Introduction; Feedback to and from students in medical education settings; Example: HKU iClass; Example: feedback to students on their performance from tutor and from peers; Example: feedback from students to tutor; Feedback in clinical teaching environments; Example: recorded consultation review as feedback to students; Example: student reflective writing as feedback to community-based clinical teachers; Feedback through course evaluation HKU Student Learning Experience Questionnaire (HKUSLEQ)Staff-Student Consultation Meetings (SSCM); Focus group interviews; Faculty-co-ordinated paper questionnaires; Mechanisms for reviewing student evaluations for enhancement of teaching and learning; Faculty Teaching and Learning Quality Committee (FTLQC); Quality Assurance Sub-committee of the MBBS Curriculum Committee; Conclusion; 3: Feedback as Conceptualised and Practised in South East Asia; Abstract; Introduction; Feedback on the learning process; How feedback is conceptualised; How feedback is carried out; Improving current practice Unhealthy practices related to the feedback providerUnhealthy practices related to the feedback recipient; Feedback on the teaching process; Context; Feedback; Acting upon feedback; Conclusion; 4: Enhancing Clinical Education with Student Feedback: a Thai Perspective; Abstract; Introduction; Medical education in Thailand; Use of student feedback in undergraduate medical education; Student feedback on teaching strategies; Student feedback on a medical curriculum; Student feedback on assessment; The use of resident feedback in postgraduate training; Conclusion 5: Student Feedback in Medical and Health Sciences: an Indian PerspectiveAbstract; Use of student feedback for evaluation of faculty (SEF); Common criticisms and perceptions of SEF; Key points on the utility of student feedback; Some background in Indian medical education; Cultural and contextual issues regarding use of student feedback in India; Current use of student feedback in medical and health professional education in India; Department of Physiology; College of Nursing; Utilisation of feedback; Manipal University Experience; Prospects of using student feedback effectively in India Role of faculty development |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910465107403321 |
Nair Chenicheri Sid | ||
Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Enhancing learning and teaching : student feedback in medical and health sciences / / Chenicheri Sid Nair, Patricie Mertova |
Autore | Nair Chenicheri Sid |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 378.125 |
Collana | Chandos Learning and Teaching Series |
Soggetto topico |
Education, Higher - Study and teaching
Medical sciences - Study and teaching (Higher) Student evaluation of curriculum |
ISBN |
1-78063-433-1
1-84334-752-0 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Cover image; Title page; Table of Contents; Copyright page; List of figures and tables; Preface; Author biographies; 1: Evaluating Student Experiences of Medical Education in the Joint Medical Programme: a Case Study of a Unique Dual University Programme; Abstract; Introduction; Evaluating the learning experience in the JMP: initial cohort 2008-2011; The instruments, their purpose and reflection on performance; Qualitative instruments; Reflections on performance, years 1-3; Closing the loop for students; Issues of dependability, credibility, and trustworthiness; Conclusions; Acknowledgements
2: Using Student Feedback to Enhance Teaching and Learning in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: the University of Hong Kong ExperienceAbstract; Introduction; Feedback to and from students in medical education settings; Example: HKU iClass; Example: feedback to students on their performance from tutor and from peers; Example: feedback from students to tutor; Feedback in clinical teaching environments; Example: recorded consultation review as feedback to students; Example: student reflective writing as feedback to community-based clinical teachers; Feedback through course evaluation HKU Student Learning Experience Questionnaire (HKUSLEQ)Staff-Student Consultation Meetings (SSCM); Focus group interviews; Faculty-co-ordinated paper questionnaires; Mechanisms for reviewing student evaluations for enhancement of teaching and learning; Faculty Teaching and Learning Quality Committee (FTLQC); Quality Assurance Sub-committee of the MBBS Curriculum Committee; Conclusion; 3: Feedback as Conceptualised and Practised in South East Asia; Abstract; Introduction; Feedback on the learning process; How feedback is conceptualised; How feedback is carried out; Improving current practice Unhealthy practices related to the feedback providerUnhealthy practices related to the feedback recipient; Feedback on the teaching process; Context; Feedback; Acting upon feedback; Conclusion; 4: Enhancing Clinical Education with Student Feedback: a Thai Perspective; Abstract; Introduction; Medical education in Thailand; Use of student feedback in undergraduate medical education; Student feedback on teaching strategies; Student feedback on a medical curriculum; Student feedback on assessment; The use of resident feedback in postgraduate training; Conclusion 5: Student Feedback in Medical and Health Sciences: an Indian PerspectiveAbstract; Use of student feedback for evaluation of faculty (SEF); Common criticisms and perceptions of SEF; Key points on the utility of student feedback; Some background in Indian medical education; Cultural and contextual issues regarding use of student feedback in India; Current use of student feedback in medical and health professional education in India; Department of Physiology; College of Nursing; Utilisation of feedback; Manipal University Experience; Prospects of using student feedback effectively in India Role of faculty development |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910792223203321 |
Nair Chenicheri Sid | ||
Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Enhancing learning and teaching : student feedback in medical and health sciences / / Chenicheri Sid Nair, Patricie Mertova |
Autore | Nair Chenicheri Sid |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 378.125 |
Collana | Chandos Learning and Teaching Series |
Soggetto topico |
Education, Higher - Study and teaching
Medical sciences - Study and teaching (Higher) Student evaluation of curriculum |
ISBN |
1-78063-433-1
1-84334-752-0 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Cover image; Title page; Table of Contents; Copyright page; List of figures and tables; Preface; Author biographies; 1: Evaluating Student Experiences of Medical Education in the Joint Medical Programme: a Case Study of a Unique Dual University Programme; Abstract; Introduction; Evaluating the learning experience in the JMP: initial cohort 2008-2011; The instruments, their purpose and reflection on performance; Qualitative instruments; Reflections on performance, years 1-3; Closing the loop for students; Issues of dependability, credibility, and trustworthiness; Conclusions; Acknowledgements
2: Using Student Feedback to Enhance Teaching and Learning in an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: the University of Hong Kong ExperienceAbstract; Introduction; Feedback to and from students in medical education settings; Example: HKU iClass; Example: feedback to students on their performance from tutor and from peers; Example: feedback from students to tutor; Feedback in clinical teaching environments; Example: recorded consultation review as feedback to students; Example: student reflective writing as feedback to community-based clinical teachers; Feedback through course evaluation HKU Student Learning Experience Questionnaire (HKUSLEQ)Staff-Student Consultation Meetings (SSCM); Focus group interviews; Faculty-co-ordinated paper questionnaires; Mechanisms for reviewing student evaluations for enhancement of teaching and learning; Faculty Teaching and Learning Quality Committee (FTLQC); Quality Assurance Sub-committee of the MBBS Curriculum Committee; Conclusion; 3: Feedback as Conceptualised and Practised in South East Asia; Abstract; Introduction; Feedback on the learning process; How feedback is conceptualised; How feedback is carried out; Improving current practice Unhealthy practices related to the feedback providerUnhealthy practices related to the feedback recipient; Feedback on the teaching process; Context; Feedback; Acting upon feedback; Conclusion; 4: Enhancing Clinical Education with Student Feedback: a Thai Perspective; Abstract; Introduction; Medical education in Thailand; Use of student feedback in undergraduate medical education; Student feedback on teaching strategies; Student feedback on a medical curriculum; Student feedback on assessment; The use of resident feedback in postgraduate training; Conclusion 5: Student Feedback in Medical and Health Sciences: an Indian PerspectiveAbstract; Use of student feedback for evaluation of faculty (SEF); Common criticisms and perceptions of SEF; Key points on the utility of student feedback; Some background in Indian medical education; Cultural and contextual issues regarding use of student feedback in India; Current use of student feedback in medical and health professional education in India; Department of Physiology; College of Nursing; Utilisation of feedback; Manipal University Experience; Prospects of using student feedback effectively in India Role of faculty development |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910827698803321 |
Nair Chenicheri Sid | ||
Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : Chandos Publishing, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
The good paper : a handbook for writing papers in higher education / / Lotte Rienecker and Peter Stray Jørgensen ; with contributions by Signe Skov |
Autore | Rienecker Lotte |
Edizione | [First printed edition.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (385 p.) |
Disciplina | 808.06/6378 |
Soggetto topico |
Dissertations, Academic
Academic writing Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN | 87-593-2167-9 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
The Good Paper - A handbook for writing papers in higher education; Copyright; Contents; Foreword to the English version; Use; Foundation and background; Research papers, BA theses and essays; Examples from good papers from professional bachelor and master programmes; Collaboration with research libraries; Activity book; Contact the authors; Reading Guide; 1. Good Papers in Higher Education - Genres and Quality Criteria; The research paper as a genre; The research genre investigates a subject-specific problem; The research paper meets scientific and scholarly requirements
Research means bringing factors into playThe research text is hierarchical; Research is both the knowledge and the inquiry of the field; Academic speech acts; Requirements and qualities of the good paper in higher education; Avoid common misconceptions of what constitutes a good paper; Other types of papers and genres you will have to write as a student; Other types of papers: Popularising papers, practice papers, tests; The foundation of your research - the paper's pentagon; What can be included in the pentagon's corners?; Examples of good papers in the pentagon model; Use the pentagon The good paper's quality criteriaA teacher's comments on a paper; Rhetoric of science; 1. In the good paper, the writer is professional and displays independence; Independence; 2. The good paper uses the field's knowledge and tools; Knowledge production; 3. The good paper is focused; 4. The good paper is "written" on the top of the taxonomies of educational objectives.; 5. The good paper is an argument; 6. The good paper is critical of its own material, its field and of itself; 7. The good paper communicates on a meta level; 8. The good paper meets the curriculum's parameters Read your curriculumExamples of qualities in bachelor theses; Nuances?; The different purposes and ideals of the Anglo-American and Continental research traditions; Advice to students writing in the Continental tradition; 2. Writing Processes of Research Papers; Choice of topic; Your interest in the topic; The useful topic; The good topic; Theoretical, abstract or concrete topics?; After choosing a topic, the first thing you should do is write; You have started writing, yes, but what?; Write before and while you read; Write backwards - start with the conclusion; Begin with the central aspects Put off in depth studies of theory and history, summaries and descriptionsBe flexible when writing; Introductory writing is writing to think; The techniques of writing to think; Brainstorming; Mind mapping; Non-stop writing; Broad writing; Display (visual representations) i.e. drawing the central content of your paper; Why write to think?; From writing to think to drafts to finished papers; Writing with or without an outline; The texts of the writing process: Notes, drafts and finished text; Should you write with a reader in mind?; Revising a text; Take a break; Revise on paper Criteria for revision |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910460711503321 |
Rienecker Lotte | ||
Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
The good paper : a handbook for writing papers in higher education / / Lotte Rienecker and Peter Stray Jørgensen ; with contributions by Signe Skov |
Autore | Rienecker Lotte |
Edizione | [First printed edition.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (385 p.) |
Disciplina | 808.06/6378 |
Soggetto topico |
Dissertations, Academic
Academic writing Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
ISBN | 87-593-2167-9 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
The Good Paper - A handbook for writing papers in higher education; Copyright; Contents; Foreword to the English version; Use; Foundation and background; Research papers, BA theses and essays; Examples from good papers from professional bachelor and master programmes; Collaboration with research libraries; Activity book; Contact the authors; Reading Guide; 1. Good Papers in Higher Education - Genres and Quality Criteria; The research paper as a genre; The research genre investigates a subject-specific problem; The research paper meets scientific and scholarly requirements
Research means bringing factors into playThe research text is hierarchical; Research is both the knowledge and the inquiry of the field; Academic speech acts; Requirements and qualities of the good paper in higher education; Avoid common misconceptions of what constitutes a good paper; Other types of papers and genres you will have to write as a student; Other types of papers: Popularising papers, practice papers, tests; The foundation of your research - the paper's pentagon; What can be included in the pentagon's corners?; Examples of good papers in the pentagon model; Use the pentagon The good paper's quality criteriaA teacher's comments on a paper; Rhetoric of science; 1. In the good paper, the writer is professional and displays independence; Independence; 2. The good paper uses the field's knowledge and tools; Knowledge production; 3. The good paper is focused; 4. The good paper is "written" on the top of the taxonomies of educational objectives.; 5. The good paper is an argument; 6. The good paper is critical of its own material, its field and of itself; 7. The good paper communicates on a meta level; 8. The good paper meets the curriculum's parameters Read your curriculumExamples of qualities in bachelor theses; Nuances?; The different purposes and ideals of the Anglo-American and Continental research traditions; Advice to students writing in the Continental tradition; 2. Writing Processes of Research Papers; Choice of topic; Your interest in the topic; The useful topic; The good topic; Theoretical, abstract or concrete topics?; After choosing a topic, the first thing you should do is write; You have started writing, yes, but what?; Write before and while you read; Write backwards - start with the conclusion; Begin with the central aspects Put off in depth studies of theory and history, summaries and descriptionsBe flexible when writing; Introductory writing is writing to think; The techniques of writing to think; Brainstorming; Mind mapping; Non-stop writing; Broad writing; Display (visual representations) i.e. drawing the central content of your paper; Why write to think?; From writing to think to drafts to finished papers; Writing with or without an outline; The texts of the writing process: Notes, drafts and finished text; Should you write with a reader in mind?; Revising a text; Take a break; Revise on paper Criteria for revision |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910797823503321 |
Rienecker Lotte | ||
Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
The good paper : a handbook for writing papers in higher education / / Lotte Rienecker and Peter Stray Jørgensen ; with contributions by Signe Skov |
Autore | Rienecker Lotte |
Edizione | [First printed edition.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (385 p.) |
Disciplina | 808.06/6378 |
Soggetto topico |
Dissertations, Academic
Academic writing Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
ISBN | 87-593-2167-9 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
The Good Paper - A handbook for writing papers in higher education; Copyright; Contents; Foreword to the English version; Use; Foundation and background; Research papers, BA theses and essays; Examples from good papers from professional bachelor and master programmes; Collaboration with research libraries; Activity book; Contact the authors; Reading Guide; 1. Good Papers in Higher Education - Genres and Quality Criteria; The research paper as a genre; The research genre investigates a subject-specific problem; The research paper meets scientific and scholarly requirements
Research means bringing factors into playThe research text is hierarchical; Research is both the knowledge and the inquiry of the field; Academic speech acts; Requirements and qualities of the good paper in higher education; Avoid common misconceptions of what constitutes a good paper; Other types of papers and genres you will have to write as a student; Other types of papers: Popularising papers, practice papers, tests; The foundation of your research - the paper's pentagon; What can be included in the pentagon's corners?; Examples of good papers in the pentagon model; Use the pentagon The good paper's quality criteriaA teacher's comments on a paper; Rhetoric of science; 1. In the good paper, the writer is professional and displays independence; Independence; 2. The good paper uses the field's knowledge and tools; Knowledge production; 3. The good paper is focused; 4. The good paper is "written" on the top of the taxonomies of educational objectives.; 5. The good paper is an argument; 6. The good paper is critical of its own material, its field and of itself; 7. The good paper communicates on a meta level; 8. The good paper meets the curriculum's parameters Read your curriculumExamples of qualities in bachelor theses; Nuances?; The different purposes and ideals of the Anglo-American and Continental research traditions; Advice to students writing in the Continental tradition; 2. Writing Processes of Research Papers; Choice of topic; Your interest in the topic; The useful topic; The good topic; Theoretical, abstract or concrete topics?; After choosing a topic, the first thing you should do is write; You have started writing, yes, but what?; Write before and while you read; Write backwards - start with the conclusion; Begin with the central aspects Put off in depth studies of theory and history, summaries and descriptionsBe flexible when writing; Introductory writing is writing to think; The techniques of writing to think; Brainstorming; Mind mapping; Non-stop writing; Broad writing; Display (visual representations) i.e. drawing the central content of your paper; Why write to think?; From writing to think to drafts to finished papers; Writing with or without an outline; The texts of the writing process: Notes, drafts and finished text; Should you write with a reader in mind?; Revising a text; Take a break; Revise on paper Criteria for revision |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910819377003321 |
Rienecker Lotte | ||
Frederiksberg, Denmark : , : Samfundslitteratur, , 2015 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
How to examine a thesis [[electronic resource] /] / Lynne Pearce |
Autore | Pearce Lynne |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, : Society for Research in Higher Education, 2005 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (144 p.) |
Disciplina | 378.155 $2 22 |
Soggetto topico |
Universities and colleges - Graduate work - Examinations
Universities and colleges - Great Britain - Graduate work Education, Higher - Study and teaching |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
1-280-94760-8
9786610947607 0-335-21443-6 0-335-22742-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | Cover page; Halftitle page; Current titles; Title page; Copyright page; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction; Chapter 1; Chapter 2; Chapter 3; Chapter 4; Chapter 5; Chapter 6; Notes; Bibliography; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910458151303321 |
Pearce Lynne | ||
Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, : Society for Research in Higher Education, 2005 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
International journal for students as partners |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hamilton, Ontario : , : McMaster University Library Press, , 2017- |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource |
Soggetto topico |
Education, Higher
Teaching Education, Higher - Study and teaching Teacher-student relationships |
Soggetto genere / forma | Periodicals. |
ISSN | 2560-7367 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Periodico |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Altri titoli varianti | IJSaP |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910489951903321 |
Hamilton, Ontario : , : McMaster University Library Press, , 2017- | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|