Advocacy and opposition : an introduction to argumentation / / Karyn C. Rybacki, Donald J. Rybacki
| Advocacy and opposition : an introduction to argumentation / / Karyn C. Rybacki, Donald J. Rybacki |
| Autore | Rybacki Karyn C (Karyn Charles), <1947-> |
| Edizione | [Seventh edition, Pearson new international edition.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Harlow, Essex : , : Pearson Educaion Limited, , [2014] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (261 pages) : illustrations (some color) |
| Disciplina | 808 |
| Collana | Always learning |
| Soggetto topico |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Debates and debating Proposition (Logic) |
| ISBN | 1-292-05518-9 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Cover -- Table of Contents -- 1. What Is Argumentation? -- 2. Where Do I Begin in Argumentation? -- 3. What Am I Going to Argue About? -- 4. How Do I Analyze Propositions? -- 5. How Is a Unit of Argument Created? -- 6. How Do I Prove My Argument? -- 7. How Do I Reason with My Audience? -- 8. What Should I Avoid? -- 9. How Are Factual Propositions Argued? -- 10. How Are Value Propositions Argued? -- Glossary. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910153079503321 |
Rybacki Karyn C (Karyn Charles), <1947->
|
||
| Harlow, Essex : , : Pearson Educaion Limited, , [2014] | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argument and audience [[electronic resource] ] : presenting debates in public settings / / by Ken Broda-Bahm, Daniela Kempf, William J. Driscoll
| Argument and audience [[electronic resource] ] : presenting debates in public settings / / by Ken Broda-Bahm, Daniela Kempf, William J. Driscoll |
| Autore | Broda-Bahm Kenneth T. <1963-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2004 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (376 p.) |
| Disciplina | 808.5/3 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
KempfDaniela <1969->
DriscollWilliam J. <1955-> |
| Soggetto topico | Debates and debating |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-932716-84-X
1-4175-3418-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | A rationale for public debates -- The history of public debates -- An ethical perspective for public debates -- Moving from tournament debating to public debating -- Preliminary steps -- Crafting a proposition -- Developing a format -- Attracting attention -- Coaching and preparation -- Reasoning with your audience -- Making your arguments compelling -- Listening and note taking in public debates -- Opening speeches -- Refutation -- Delivering your arguments effectively -- Questioning -- Moderating the debate -- Ending the debate. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910450630403321 |
Broda-Bahm Kenneth T. <1963->
|
||
| New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2004 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argument and audience [[electronic resource] ] : presenting debates in public settings / / by Ken Broda-Bahm, Daniela Kempf, William J. Driscoll
| Argument and audience [[electronic resource] ] : presenting debates in public settings / / by Ken Broda-Bahm, Daniela Kempf, William J. Driscoll |
| Autore | Broda-Bahm Kenneth T. <1963-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2004 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (376 p.) |
| Disciplina | 808.5/3 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
KempfDaniela <1969->
DriscollWilliam J. <1955-> |
| Soggetto topico | Debates and debating |
| ISBN |
1-932716-84-X
1-4175-3418-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | A rationale for public debates -- The history of public debates -- An ethical perspective for public debates -- Moving from tournament debating to public debating -- Preliminary steps -- Crafting a proposition -- Developing a format -- Attracting attention -- Coaching and preparation -- Reasoning with your audience -- Making your arguments compelling -- Listening and note taking in public debates -- Opening speeches -- Refutation -- Delivering your arguments effectively -- Questioning -- Moderating the debate -- Ending the debate. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910783248403321 |
Broda-Bahm Kenneth T. <1963->
|
||
| New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2004 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation : across the lines of discipline : proceedings of the conference on argumentation 1986 / / editors, Frans H. van Eemeren [et al.]
| Argumentation : across the lines of discipline : proceedings of the conference on argumentation 1986 / / editors, Frans H. van Eemeren [et al.] |
| Autore | Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946-> |
| Edizione | [Reprint 2011] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Dordrecht, : Foris Publications, 1987, c1986 |
| Descrizione fisica | ix, 402 p |
| Disciplina | 168 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | EemerenF. H. van <1946-> (Frans Hendrik) |
| Collana | Studies of Argumentation in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis |
| Soggetto topico |
Debates and debating
Logic Persuasion (Rhetoric) Reasoning |
| ISBN | 3-11-086771-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Introduction / Eemeren, Frans Η. van / Grootendorst, Rob / Blair, J. Anthony / Willard, Charles A. -- Logical and Dialectical Perspectives -- Chapter 1. Probative Logic: REVIEW & PREVIEW / Scriven, Michael -- Chapter 2. Logic to Some Purpose: Theses against the Deductive-Nomological Paradigm in the Science of Logic / Barth, E.M. -- Chaper 3. Logic Naturalized: Recovering A Tradition / Johnson, Ralph H. -- Chapter 4. Beyond Induction and Deduction / Govier, Trudy -- Chapter 5 Meaning Postulates and Rules of Argumentation: Remarks concerning the pragmatic tie between meaning (of terms) and truth (of propositions) / Lorenz, Kuno -- Chapter 6. Arab Dialecticians on Rational Discussion / Taha, Abderrahmane -- Rhetorical and Epistemological Perspectives -- Chapter 7. An Historical Approach to the Study of Argumentation / Finocchiaro, Maurice A. -- Chapter 8. Argument and Usable Traditions / Cox, J. Robert -- Chapter 9. The Rhetorical Perspective on Argument / Wenzel, Joseph W. -- Chapter 10. Rhetorical Communication as Argumentation / Geissner, Hellmut -- Chapter 11. Argumentation without Proposition / Meyer, Michel -- Chapter 12. Generational Argument / Goodnight, G. Thomas -- Chapter 13. Valuing Dissensus / Willard, Charles Arthur -- Chapter 14. Rescher on Pascal's Wager Argument / Airaksinen, Timo -- Chapter 15. Argumentation and Narrativity / Parret, Herman -- Pragmatic and Conversational Perspectives -- Chapter 16. The Function of Argumentation: A Pragmatic Approach / Kopperschmidt, Josef -- Chapter 17. Argumentation, Inquiry and Speech Act Theory / Blair, J. Anthony -- Chapter 18. For Reason's Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse / Eemeren, Frans Η. van -- Chapter 19. Rational and Pragmatic Aspects of Argument / Jackson, Sally -- Chapter 20. The Management of Disagreement in Conversation / Jacobs, Scott -- Chapter 21. Identity Management in Argumentative Discourse / Kline, Susan L. -- Chapter 22. Measuring Argumentative Competence / Trapp, Robert / Yingling, Julie M. / Wanner, James -- Chapter 23. Some Figures of Speech / Fogelin, Robert J. -- Argumentation Analysis, Evaluation and Fallacies -- Chapter 24. Towards a Typology of Argumentative Schemes / Kienpointner, Manfred -- Chapter 25. Enthymematic Arguments / Hitchcock, David -- Chapter 26. Argument Evaluation / Benoit, William L. -- Chapter 27. Naess's Dichotomy of Tenability and Relevance / Krabbe, Erik C. W. -- Chapter 28. Reseller's Plausibility Thesis and the Justification of Arguments: A Critical Appraisal / McKerrow, Raymie E. -- Chapter 29. What is a Fallacy? / Walton, Douglas N. -- Chapter 30. Some Fallacies about Fallacies / Grootendorst, Rob -- Chapter 31. Ad Baculum, Self-interest and Pascal's Wager / Woods, John -- Applications of Argumentation Theory -- Chapter 32. Rational Argumentation and Political Deception / Vedung, Evert -- Chapter 33. Evolution of Judicial Argument in Free Expression Cases / Rieke, Richard D. -- Chapter 34. Argumentation in English and Finnish Editorials / Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja -- Chapter 35. Critical Thinking in the Strong Sense and The Role of Argumentation in Everyday Life / Paul, Richard W. -- Chapter 36. Informal logic and the deductive-inductive distinction / Weddle, Perry -- Chapter 37. Arguments and Explanations / Hoaglund, John -- List of Contributors |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910785834703321 |
Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946->
|
||
| Dordrecht, : Foris Publications, 1987, c1986 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam
| Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
| Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
| Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
| Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910465060003321 |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam
| Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
| Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
| Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
| Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
| ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910786610603321 |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam
| Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
| Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
| Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
| Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
| ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910812940203321 |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation et dialectique en Islam : formes et séquences de la munãzara / / Abdessamad Belhaj
| Argumentation et dialectique en Islam : formes et séquences de la munãzara / / Abdessamad Belhaj |
| Autore | Belhaj Abdessamad |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium : , : Presses Universitaires de Louvain, , 2010 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (178 pages) |
| Collana | Hors collections |
| Soggetto topico |
Debates and debating
Dialectic |
| ISBN | 2-87558-188-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | fre |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910495915803321 |
Belhaj Abdessamad
|
||
| Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium : , : Presses Universitaires de Louvain, , 2010 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Argumentation et narration / / edited by Emmanuelle Danblon [and three others]
| Argumentation et narration / / edited by Emmanuelle Danblon [and three others] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Bruxelles : , : Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, , 2008 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (210 pages) |
| Disciplina | 808.53 |
| Collana | Collection Philosophie et société |
| Soggetto topico |
Debates and debating
Discourse analysis |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | fre |
| Nota di contenuto | Enonciation et narration. Fragments de rhétorique chiraquienne / Jean-Michel Adam -- Narratio et argumentation / Thierry Herman -- L'argumentation au secours de la narration et vice versa Etude des préfaces du Dernier jour d'un condamné / Raphaël Micheli -- Le récit politique dans le discours de clôture de la présidence luxembourgeoise Ne pas cacher l'aventure / Evgénia Paparouni -- Interprétation, narration et argumentation en droit: le modèle du roman à la chaîne chez Ronald Dworkin / Julie Allard -- Etablir, qualifier, augmenter: le "fait" et le "droit" à la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme / Jean-Claude K. Dupont -- Le préambule des déclarations des droits de l'homme: entre narration et argumentation / Emmanuel de Jonge -- Le mauvais exemple et l'art d'écrire entre les lignes / Marc Dominicy -- Témoignages de guerre et méandres génériques: la guerre de 14 selon Barbusse et Cendrars / Madeleine Frédéric -- Narration et argumentation dans Cendrillon, ou la petite pantoufle de verre de Perrault et Cenerentola de Buzzati / Ute Heidmann -- A tort et à l'envers: Sade ou l'écriture travestie / François Ost -- La pluralité des modes d'argumentation du discours bioéthique: entre pragmatisme et recherche d'objectivité du jugement / Mylène Botbol-Baum -- La nécessaire articulation de l'argumentation avec la narration Les vertus d'une modèle inférentialiste de la rationalité / Stéphane Leyens -- Narration et argumentation en Grèce ancienne / Sophie Klimis -- Registres de discours, identité, normativité / Jean-Marc Ferry. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910725997403321 |
| Bruxelles : , : Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, , 2008 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Art, argument, and advocacy [[electronic resource] ] : mastering parliamentary debate / / John Meany and Kate Shuster
| Art, argument, and advocacy [[electronic resource] ] : mastering parliamentary debate / / John Meany and Kate Shuster |
| Autore | Meany John |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2002 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (383 p.) |
| Disciplina | 808.53 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | ShusterKate <1974-> |
| Soggetto topico | Debates and debating |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-932716-85-8
0-585-42798-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
""Table of Contents""; ""PREFACE""; ""CHAPTER 1: Formats and Speaker Responsibilities""; ""CHAPTER 2: TOPICS AND TOPIC INTERPRETATION""; ""CHAPTER 3: ARGUMENT THEORY FOR DEBATERS""; ""CHAPTER 4: CASE CONSTRUCTION""; ""CHAPTER 5: ARGUING AGAINST THE PROPOSITION CASE""; ""CHAPTER 6: EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH""; ""CHAPTER 7: OPPOSITION STRATEGY � DISADVANTAGES""; ""CHAPTER 8: OPPOSITION STRATEGY � COUNTERPLANS""; ""CHAPTER 9: OPPOSITION STRATEGY � CRITIQUING""; ""CHAPTER 10: PARLIAMENTARY POINTS""; ""CHAPTER 11: SKILLS""; ""CHAPTER 12: TOURNAMENT ADMINISTRATION AND TOPIC SELECTION""
""APPENDIX I SAMPLE PARLIAMENTARY TOPICS""""APPENDIX II RESOURCES""; ""APPENDIX III ARGUMENTATION AND DEBATE GLOSSARY""; ""APPENDIX IV SAMPLE DEBATE TRANSCRIPTS""; ""INDEX"" |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910455802003321 |
Meany John
|
||
| New York, : International Debate Education Association, 2002 | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||