| Autore |
Chen Ruihua
|
| Pubbl/distr/stampa |
Singapore : , : Springer, , [2022]
|
| Descrizione fisica |
1 online resource (335 pages)
|
| Disciplina |
345.5105
|
| Soggetto topico |
Criminal procedure - China
|
| ISBN |
9789811936517
9789811936500
|
| Formato |
Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione |
eng
|
| Nota di contenuto |
Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Author and Translator -- About the Author -- Translator -- Part I Systems -- 1 Three Forms of Criminal Trials -- 1.1 Diversification of Criminal Trials -- 1.2 Conviction Trial -- 1.2.1 Nature of Conviction Trial -- 1.2.2 Reform of Conviction Trial -- 1.2.3 Litigation Structure of Conviction Trial -- 1.3 Sentencing Trial -- 1.3.1 Nature of Sentencing Trial -- 1.3.2 Sentencing Trial in Ordinary Procedure -- 1.3.3 Sentencing Trial in Summary Procedure -- 1.4 Procedural Trial -- 1.4.1 Nature of Procedural Trial -- 1.4.2 Procedure of Exclusionary Rule -- 1.4.3 Procedural Trial in Pretrial Meeting -- 1.5 Impacts of Three Forms of Criminal Trials -- 1.5.1 Conviction Prosecution, Sentencing Prosecution and Procedural Prosecution -- 1.5.2 Innocence Defense, Sentencing Defense and Procedural Defense -- 1.5.3 Three Objects of Proof -- 1.5.4 Three Identities of Investigators -- 2 Evolution and Reflection of File Transfer System -- 2.1 Evolution of File Transfer System -- 2.2 Pretrial File Transfer System in 1979 -- 2.3 Trial Model Reform in 1996 -- 2.4 Post-Trial File Transfer System -- 2.5 Reinstation of Pretrial File Transfer System -- 2.6 Several Deep-Seated Factors -- 2.6.1 Judicial Tradition of Judges Leading Evidence Investigation in Court -- 2.6.2 Trial Model Centered on Case Files -- 2.6.3 Making Verdicts Outside of Court -- 2.6.4 Review System Based on Files -- 2.7 Conclusion -- 3 Case File Centrism -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Court Investigation Centered on Case Files -- 3.2.1 The Ways the Prosecutors Lead Court Investigation -- 3.2.2 Models of Reading Out the Case Files -- 3.2.3 Court Investigation: Tripartite Game of Asymmetric Information -- 3.3 Admissibility of Transcripts -- 3.4 Credibility of Case File -- 3.5 Space for Criminal Evidence Law -- 3.6 Ritualization, Theater Effect and Functions of Court Hearing.
3.7 Reform of Court Trial System -- 4 A Study on Criminal Procedure Malfunctions -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Implementation Mechanism of Criminal Procedure Law -- 4.3 Costs of Legal Proceedings -- 4.4 Losses Due to Following Procedures -- 4.5 Two Legal Traditions -- 4.6 Guarantee of Legal Procedures by Judicial System -- 4.7 Conclusion -- 5 Criminal Action in Rem -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Nature of Criminal Action in Rem -- 5.2.1 Procuratorates Initiate the Action -- 5.2.2 The Object of Action in Rem is the Claim for Confiscating Illegal Property -- 5.2.3 Action in Rem Has a Unique Litigation Structure -- 5.2.4 Application of Mechanism of Proof in Civil Procedure to Action in Rem -- 5.3 Action in Rem with Defendants Present -- 5.3.1 Restriction on Judicial Discretion -- 5.3.2 Maintenance of Procedural Justice -- 5.3.3 Realization of Trial Centrism. -- 5.3.4 Restoration of Judicial Credibility -- 5.4 Two Models of Action in Rem -- 5.4.1 Independent Action in Rem -- 5.4.2 Incidental Action in Rem -- 5.5 Victims' Participation in Action in Rem -- 5.6 Litigation Status of Interested Parties -- 5.7 Procedural Guarantee of Action in Rem -- 5.8 Conclusion -- 6 Retrospect and Prospect of Criminal Defense System in the Past Forty Years -- 6.1 A Brief Review of Development of Criminal Defense System -- 6.2 Lawyers' Role: From "State Law Practitioners" to "Legal Agents" -- 6.3 Lawyers' Participation: From "Court Defense" to "Whole Process Defense" -- 6.4 Defense Subjects: From "The Right to Defend" to "The Right to Get Help from Lawyers" -- 6.5 Defense Effect: From "Obtaining Lawyers' Help" to "Obtaining Effective Defense" -- 6.6 Protection of the Right to Defense: "Judicial Remedy" and "Legal Risk Prevention and Control" -- 6.7 Conclusion -- Part II Models -- 7 Negotiated Procedural Justice -- 7.1 Introduction.
7.2 Limitations of Traditional Procedural Justice Theory -- 7.2.1 Does It Apply to Non-Confrontational Procedures? -- 7.2.2 Is the Out-Court Procedure Justified? -- 7.2.3 Are There Objective Standards for the Fairness of Results? -- 7.2.4 Do the Parties not Care About the Result? -- 7.3 The Rise of Negotiated Justice and Its Disputes -- 7.3.1 Sentencing Negotiation Procedure -- 7.3.2 Criminal Reconciliation Procedure -- 7.3.3 Disputes Over Negotiated Justice Procedures -- 7.4 The Theory of Negotiated Procedural Justice -- 7.4.1 Basic Concepts -- 7.4.2 Basic Elements -- 7.5 Foundation of Negotiated Procedural Justice -- 7.5.1 Litigation Subject Theory -- 7.5.2 Rational Choice Theory -- 7.5.3 Utilitarianism Philosophy -- 7.6 Extended Application of Negotiated Procedural Justice -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8 Confrontation and Cooperation in Judicial Process-A New Theory of Criminal Procedure Model -- 8.1 Confrontational Justice and Cooperative Justice -- 8.2 Parkers and Griffith's Models -- 8.3 Confrontational Justice and Its Limitations -- 8.3.1 Basic Principles of Confrontational Justice -- 8.3.2 Limitations of Confrontational Justice -- 8.4 Minimum Cooperation Model -- 8.5 Negotiated Public Cooperation Model -- 8.5.1 Two Traditions of Negotiated Cooperative Justice -- 8.5.2 The First Plea Bargaining Case in China -- 8.5.3 Limits of Negotiated Public Cooperation Model -- 8.6 Private Cooperation Model -- 8.6.1 Emergence of Criminal Reconciliation in China -- 8.6.2 What is Restorative Justice? -- 8.6.3 China's Restorative Justice? -- 8.6.4 Revival of Accusatorial System? -- 8.7 A New Cooperative Justice Philosophy -- 8.7.1 Pragmatism Philosophy -- 8.7.2 Judicial Justice Based on Cooperation -- 8.7.3 The Third Legal Value -- 9 Private Cooperation Model in Criminal Procedure -- 9.1 Emergence of Criminal Reconciliation.
9.2 Three Models of Criminal Reconciliation -- 9.2.1 Defendant-Victim Self-Reconciliation Model -- 9.2.2 Judicial Mediation Model -- 9.2.3 People's Mediation Committee Model -- 9.3 Practical Interests of Criminal Reconciliation -- 9.3.1 Common Interests of the Offender and the Victim -- 9.3.2 The Benefit of Judicial Organs -- 9.3.3 Social Harmony -- 9.4 Challenges of Criminal Reconciliation to Traditional Criminal Procedure Theory -- 9.4.1 Confrontational Model and Cooperative Model -- 9.4.2 The Model Centered on the Relationship Between the Victim and the Defendant -- 9.4.3 Boundary Between Criminal Procedure and Civil Procedure -- 9.5 The Future of Criminal Reconciliation -- 10 Public Cooperation Model in Criminal Procedure -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Characteristics of Sentencing Negotiation System -- 10.2.1 Sentencing Negotiation Led by Prosecutors -- 10.2.2 Negotiating Parties -- 10.2.3 Sequenced Lenient Sentencing Mechanism -- 10.2.4 Participation of Duty Lawyers -- 10.2.5 Judges' Role -- 10.3 Foundation of Sentencing Negotiation System -- 10.3.1 Rational Allocation of Judicial Resources Through Sentencing Incentive Mechanism -- 10.3.2 A Win-win Situation -- 10.3.3 Substantive Procedural Justice -- 10.4 Problems in Sentencing Negotiation System -- 10.4.1 Abuse of Power by Prosecutors -- 10.4.2 Negotiation Between Prosecutors and the Suspects? -- 10.4.3 Limitations of Legal Assistance of Duty Lawyers -- 10.4.4 Judicial Review -- 10.5 Conceptual Challenges for the Sentencing Negotiation System -- 10.5.1 Finding Facts -- 10.5.2 Justice in Criminal Law -- 10.5.3 The Idea of Equality Before the Law -- 10.5.4 Abuse of Discretion -- 10.5.5 Status of Defendants -- 10.6 Conclusion -- 11 Compliance Incentive Models in Criminal Procedure -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 Two Models of Compliance-Based Non-prosecution -- 11.2.1 Procuratorial Suggestion Model.
11.2.2 Conditional Non-prosecution Model -- 11.2.3 Choice of Models of Compliance-Based Non-prosecution -- 11.3 Reasons for Establishing Compliance-Based Non-prosecution System -- 11.3.1 Protecting Private Enterprises -- 11.3.2 Compliance of Private Enterprise Business Model -- 11.3.3 A New Way for Procuratorates to Participate in Social Governance -- 11.4 Controversies in the Compliance-Based Non-prosecution System -- 11.4.1 Procuratorates' Power to Impose Fines -- 11.4.2 Compliance Supervision Period -- 11.4.3 Procedural Interface Between Procuratorates and Public Security Organs -- 11.4.4 Procedural Interface Between Procuratorates and Administrative Supervisory Authorities -- 11.4.5 Effectiveness of Independent Supervisor System -- 11.4.6 Object of Application of Compliance System -- 11.5 Influence of Compliance-Based Non-prosecution on Criminal Procedure Theory -- 11.5.1 Effect of Compliance Incentive -- 11.5.2 A New Crime Prevention Theory -- 11.5.3 Enterprise Self-regulation Theory -- 11.6 Conclusion -- 12 Three Models of Incidental Civil Action -- 12.1 Challenges of Incidental Civil Action -- 12.2 "Criminal Action Priority over Civil Action" Model -- 12.2.1 Theoretical Foundation of "Criminal Action Priority over Civil Action" Model -- 12.2.2 Challenges of "Criminal Action Priority over Civil Action" Model -- 12.2.3 Theoretical Reflection on "Criminal Action Priority over Civil Action" Model -- 12.3 "Separation of Criminal and Civil Actions" Model -- 12.3.1 Main Reasons for "Separation of Criminal and Civil Actions" Model -- 12.3.2 Some Reflections -- 12.4 "Civil Action Priority over Criminal Action" Model -- 12.4.1 Reasons for "Civil Action Priority over Criminal Action" Model -- 12.4.2 Legitimacy of "Civil Action Priority over Criminal Action" Model -- 12.5 Choice of Criminal Incidental Civil Models -- 13 China's Model of Exclusionary Rule.
13.1 Introduction.
|
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910616358803321 |
Info
The crime of counterrevolution in the People's Republic of China (PRC) / / prepared by Tao-tai Hsia and Wendy I. Zeldin
