Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Additional district judge for District of Maryland. January 19, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
| Additional district judge for District of Maryland. January 19, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (2 pages) |
| Altri autori (Persone) | GrahamGeorge Scott <1850-1931> (Republican (PA)) |
| Collana |
House report / 69th Congress, 2nd session. House
[United States congressional serial set] |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
District courts Judicial districts Judges |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Legislative materials. |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910716304303321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Additional district judge, northern district of California. January 19, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
| Additional district judge, northern district of California. January 19, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (2 pages) |
| Altri autori (Persone) | GrahamGeorge Scott <1850-1931> (Republican (PA)) |
| Collana |
House report / 69th Congress, 2nd session. House
[United States congressional serial set] |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
Judicial districts Judges |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Legislative materials. |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910716482103321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Additional judge for southern district of California. January 20, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
| Additional judge for southern district of California. January 20, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (1 page) |
| Altri autori (Persone) | GrahamGeorge Scott <1850-1931> (Republican (PA)) |
| Collana |
House report / 69th Congress, 2nd session. House
[United States congressional serial set] |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
District courts Judges |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Legislative materials. |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910716459903321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1927 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Civil litigation management manual / / the Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management
| Civil litigation management manual / / the Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management |
| Edizione | [Second edition.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [Administrative Office of the United States Courts] : , : [Federal Judicial Center, Information Services Office], , 2010 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xii, 208 pages) |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay - United States
Court administration - United States Costs (Law) - United States Costs (Law) Court administration Court congestion and delay |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Early and ongoing control of the pretrial process -- Setting and monitoring a case-management plan -- Discovery management -- Pretrial motions management -- Alternative dispute resolution and judicial settlement -- Final pretrial conference and trial planning -- Special case matters -- Personnel resources in litigation management -- Using information technology for litigation management. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910693817503321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [Administrative Office of the United States Courts] : , : [Federal Judicial Center, Information Services Office], , 2010 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Creating an additional judge for the District of Maryland. April 19 (calendar day, April 28), 1926. -- Ordered to be printed
| Creating an additional judge for the District of Maryland. April 19 (calendar day, April 28), 1926. -- Ordered to be printed |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1926 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (3 pages) : tables |
| Altri autori (Persone) | CumminsAlbert Baird <1850-1926> (Republican (IA)) |
| Collana |
Senate report / 69th Congress, 1st session. Senate
[United States congressional serial set ] |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
Judicial districts Legislative amendments Judges |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Legislative materials. |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Altri titoli varianti | Creating an additional judge for the District of Maryland. April 19 |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910716265803321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1926 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
La invocación del plazo razonable ante el tribunal de justicia / / Carlos J. Moreiro
| La invocación del plazo razonable ante el tribunal de justicia / / Carlos J. Moreiro |
| Autore | Moreiro Carlos J |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Madrid : , : Dykinson, , 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (129 p.) |
| Disciplina | 347013 |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
Speedy trial Justicia Procedimiento legal |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 84-9031-461-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | spa |
| Nota di contenuto |
LA INVOCACIÓN DEL PLAZO RAZONABLE (...); P{AGINA LEGAL; ÍNDICE; INTRODUCCIÓN; CAPÍTULO I CARACTERÍSTICAS GENERALES DEL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO A UN PROCESO SIN DILACIONES INDEBIDAS; I.1. LA DURACIÓN RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS COMO PARADIGMA DE LA BUENA ADMINISTRACIÓN DE JUSTICIA; I.2. EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO A UN PROCESO SIN DILACIONES INDEBIDAS EN LOS ORDENAMIENTOS INTERNO E INTERNACIONAL, Y EN EL DERECHO PRIMARIO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA; I.2.1. El reconocimiento en el derecho español
I.2.2. La cuestión de la reparación del daño causado por la duración indebida de los procedimientos judiciales en el ordenamiento españolI.2.3. El reconocimiento en el Derecho Internacional y en el Derecho primario de la Unión Europea; I.2.4. La definición del derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones indebidas en la jurisprudencia del TEDH y su impacto en la jurisprudencia constitucional española; CAPÍTULO II CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LA NATURALEZA Y EL FUNCIONAMIENTO DEL SISTEMA JURISDICCIONAL DE LA UE II.1. EL MARCO JURÍDICO-INSTITUCIONAL RELEVANTE A EFECTOS DE PONDERAR LA DURACIÓN DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOSII.2. ¿ES EFICIENTE LA JURISDICCIÓN SUPRANACIONAL?; II.3. LAS NUEVAS PROPUESTAS DE MODIFICACIÓN DEL SISTEMA JURISDICCIONAL DE LA UE; CAPÍTULO III LA DOCTRINA DEL TJ SOBRE LA DURACIÓN RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS; III.1. LA DEFINICIÓN DE LOS CRITERIOS PARA DETERMINAR EL PLAZO RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS ANTE EL TG; III.1.1. La sentencia del TJ de 17 de diciembre de 1998, Baustahlge-webe1; III.2. CONSECUENCIAS JURÍDICAS DE LA DILACIÓN JUDICIAL EN EL DERECHO DE LA UE III.2.1. La decisión sui generis en el asunto BaustahlgewebeIII.2.2. La indemnización por daños como medio jurídico de resarcimiento por las dilaciones; III.3. LA RELEVANCIA DE LA CARGA PROBATORIA DE LA EXISTENCIA DEL NEXO ENTRE LA DILACIÓN Y EL PERJUICIO AL INTERÉS DEL DEMANDANTE. REDEFINICIÓN DEL CÓMPUTO DEL PLAZO RAZONABLE; III.3.1. Criterios de valoración de las pruebas; III.3.2. Redefinición del cómputo del plazo razonable; III.4. LA INTERPRETACIÓN RESTRICTIVA DEL GRADO DE RESPONSABILIDAD INSTITUCIONAL EN LAS SITUACIONES DE DURACIÓN EXCESIVA DEL PROCESO III.5. CONSOLIDACIÓN DE LA DOCTRINA SOBRE EL PLAZO RAZONABLECONCLUSIONES |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910273304403321 |
Moreiro Carlos J
|
||
| Madrid : , : Dykinson, , 2012 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
La invocación del plazo razonable ante el tribunal de justicia / / Carlos J. Moreiro
| La invocación del plazo razonable ante el tribunal de justicia / / Carlos J. Moreiro |
| Autore | Moreiro Carlos J |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Madrid : , : Dykinson, , 2012 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (129 p.) |
| Disciplina | 347013 |
| Soggetto topico |
Court congestion and delay
Speedy trial Justicia Procedimiento legal |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 84-9031-461-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | spa |
| Nota di contenuto |
LA INVOCACIÓN DEL PLAZO RAZONABLE (...); P{AGINA LEGAL; ÍNDICE; INTRODUCCIÓN; CAPÍTULO I CARACTERÍSTICAS GENERALES DEL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO A UN PROCESO SIN DILACIONES INDEBIDAS; I.1. LA DURACIÓN RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS COMO PARADIGMA DE LA BUENA ADMINISTRACIÓN DE JUSTICIA; I.2. EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO A UN PROCESO SIN DILACIONES INDEBIDAS EN LOS ORDENAMIENTOS INTERNO E INTERNACIONAL, Y EN EL DERECHO PRIMARIO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA; I.2.1. El reconocimiento en el derecho español
I.2.2. La cuestión de la reparación del daño causado por la duración indebida de los procedimientos judiciales en el ordenamiento españolI.2.3. El reconocimiento en el Derecho Internacional y en el Derecho primario de la Unión Europea; I.2.4. La definición del derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones indebidas en la jurisprudencia del TEDH y su impacto en la jurisprudencia constitucional española; CAPÍTULO II CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LA NATURALEZA Y EL FUNCIONAMIENTO DEL SISTEMA JURISDICCIONAL DE LA UE II.1. EL MARCO JURÍDICO-INSTITUCIONAL RELEVANTE A EFECTOS DE PONDERAR LA DURACIÓN DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOSII.2. ¿ES EFICIENTE LA JURISDICCIÓN SUPRANACIONAL?; II.3. LAS NUEVAS PROPUESTAS DE MODIFICACIÓN DEL SISTEMA JURISDICCIONAL DE LA UE; CAPÍTULO III LA DOCTRINA DEL TJ SOBRE LA DURACIÓN RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS; III.1. LA DEFINICIÓN DE LOS CRITERIOS PARA DETERMINAR EL PLAZO RAZONABLE DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS ANTE EL TG; III.1.1. La sentencia del TJ de 17 de diciembre de 1998, Baustahlge-webe1; III.2. CONSECUENCIAS JURÍDICAS DE LA DILACIÓN JUDICIAL EN EL DERECHO DE LA UE III.2.1. La decisión sui generis en el asunto BaustahlgewebeIII.2.2. La indemnización por daños como medio jurídico de resarcimiento por las dilaciones; III.3. LA RELEVANCIA DE LA CARGA PROBATORIA DE LA EXISTENCIA DEL NEXO ENTRE LA DILACIÓN Y EL PERJUICIO AL INTERÉS DEL DEMANDANTE. REDEFINICIÓN DEL CÓMPUTO DEL PLAZO RAZONABLE; III.3.1. Criterios de valoración de las pruebas; III.3.2. Redefinición del cómputo del plazo razonable; III.4. LA INTERPRETACIÓN RESTRICTIVA DEL GRADO DE RESPONSABILIDAD INSTITUCIONAL EN LAS SITUACIONES DE DURACIÓN EXCESIVA DEL PROCESO III.5. CONSOLIDACIÓN DE LA DOCTRINA SOBRE EL PLAZO RAZONABLECONCLUSIONES |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910671506403321 |
|
Moreiro Carlos J
|
||
| Madrid : , : Dykinson, , 2012 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Providing for an additional building for the use of the Police Court of the District of Columbia. May 18, 1926. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
| Providing for an additional building for the use of the Police Court of the District of Columbia. May 18, 1926. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1926 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (3 pages) |
| Altri autori (Persone) | ZihlmanFrederick Nicholas <1879-1935> (Republican (MD)) |
| Collana |
House report / 69th Congress, 1st session. House
[United States congressional serial set ] |
| Soggetto topico |
Building
Court congestion and delay Courthouses Legislative amendments |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Legislative materials. |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910716217103321 |
| [Washington, D.C.] : , : [U.S. Government Printing Office], , 1926 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Supreme courts under pressure : controlling caseload in the administration of civil justice / / Pablo Bravo-Hurtado, Cornelis Hendrik van Rhee, editors
| Supreme courts under pressure : controlling caseload in the administration of civil justice / / Pablo Bravo-Hurtado, Cornelis Hendrik van Rhee, editors |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2021] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (vii, 223 pages) : illustrations |
| Disciplina | 347.013 |
| Collana | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice |
| Soggetto topico | Court congestion and delay |
| ISBN | 3-030-63731-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Intro -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Part I: Introduction -- Introduction -- 1 `Under Pressure´ -- 1.1 Two Dimensions of Case Overload -- 1.2 Various Solutions -- 1.3 Content -- 2 Romanic Legal Tradition -- 2.1 France -- 2.2 Italy -- 2.3 Spain -- 3 Germanic Legal Tradition -- 3.1 Germany -- 3.2 Austria -- 3.3 Croatia -- 4 Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- 4.1 England and Wales -- 4.2 United States of America -- 4.3 Argentina -- References -- Part II: Romanic Legal Tradition -- Towards a Reform of the French Court of Cassation? -- 1 The French Court of Cassation in Its Context -- 2 On-Going Reform -- 3 Conclusion -- References -- Finding a Cure or Simply Relieving Symptoms? The Case of the Italian Supreme Court -- 1 The Italian Supreme Court and Its Performance -- 2 One Court and Two Different Functions -- 3 Overburdened Docket: Consequences, Internal Solutions ... -- 4 and External Interventions: The 2009 and 2016 Legislative Reforms -- 5 Effectiveness of the Solution -- 6 `Tips´ from the Outside -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Back in Focus: Case Overload and Case Selection Standards in the Spanish Supreme Court -- 1 Overview of the History of the Supreme Court -- 1.1 The Constitution of Cdiz (1812) -- 1.2 The Establishment of Cassation Appeal (1838) -- 1.3 The Definitive Shape of Spanish Cassation (1855-1881) -- 1.4 The Passing of the Crown (1978) -- 1.5 A Monetary Threshold (1984-1992) -- 1.6 `Cassational Interest´ As the Central Standard (2000) -- 1.7 A Constitutional Certiorari (2007) -- 1.8 Legal and Statistical Overview -- 1.9 Almost a Revolution (2014) -- 1.10 Towards a New Stability? -- 2 Particular Aspects -- 2.1 Composition of the Supreme Court and the Cassation Procedure -- 2.2 Case Overload Problems -- 2.3 Case Overload Solutions -- 2.3.1 Increasing Capacity -- 2.3.2 Procedural Measures -- 2.3.3 Reducing Quantity -- 3 Conclusion.
References -- Part III: Germanic Legal Tradition -- Sharing Responsibility: The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System -- 1 Overview of the Supreme Court -- 1.1 The Historical Setting -- 1.2 The Structure of the Federal Supreme Court -- 1.2.1 Internal Organisation -- 1.2.2 Special Bar of Lawyers -- 1.2.3 Other Federal Supreme Courts -- 1.2.4 The Federal Constitutional Court -- 1.3 The Procedural Setting -- 1.3.1 The Court System in Civil Matters -- 1.3.2 The Types of Appeal -- Appeal (Berufung) -- Appeal on Points of Law (Revision) -- Complaint (Beschwerde) and Complaint on Points of Law (Rechtsbeschwerde) -- 1.3.3 Restricting Access to the Bundesgerichtshof -- The System as It Was Before 2002 -- Leave to Appeal -- Striking Out Revisions -- 1.3.4 Grounds for Appeal (Revisionsgründe) -- Violation of the Law -- Factual Basis -- 1.3.5 A Successful Appeal on Points of Law -- 1.4 Workflow: Case Management -- 1.4.1 Preliminary Selection of Cases -- 1.4.2 Inferior Judges/Law Clerks -- 1.4.3 Writing the Judgment -- 1.5 Caseload -- 1.5.1 Intake -- 1.5.2 Judgment on the Merits -- 1.5.3 Evolution of Caseload Over the Years -- 2 Overload Problem -- 2.1 Symptoms of Overload -- 2.2 Crisis and Reform Movement -- 2.3 Caseload and Functions -- 3 Overload Solutions -- 3.1 Increasing Capacity -- 3.2 Reducing Quantity -- 3.2.1 Court Fees -- 3.2.2 Restrictions on Access and Other Filters -- 4 Effectiveness of the Solutions -- 5 Openness to Transplants -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Access to the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof: Attempts to Strike a Balance Between Adequate Workload and Adequate Review -- 1 The Oberster Gerichtshof -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 A Brief History of the OGH -- 1.3 Organisation of the OGH -- 1.4 Access to the OGH -- 1.4.1 Short Introduction to the Austrian Court System and Appeal Procedure. 1.4.2 Remedies Against Appeal Decisions -- 2 The High Caseload of the OGH and Attempts to Reduce It -- 2.1 Symptoms of Overload and Historical Reasons for It -- 2.2 Important Question of Law Instead of Value Limits? -- 2.3 Combination of Access Filters -- 2.4 Other Measures Against Overload -- 2.5 Other Mechanisms -- 3 Effectiveness of Current Measures -- 3.1 Development of Workload and Duration of Proceedings -- 3.2 `Usability´ of the System -- 3.3 Effectiveness in Relation to the OGH´s Function -- 3.3.1 Transformation of the Court´s Function -- 3.3.2 Fulfilment of the Respective Functions -- 3.3.3 Guiding Function -- 3.3.4 Safeguarding Individual Interests -- 4 Openness to Transplants -- 5 Conclusion -- 5.1 Absence of Real Crisis and Extent of Reforms -- 5.2 Complexity, Definition of Role and Efficiency of Reforms -- 5.3 Size of the Supreme Court and Internal Organisation -- 5.4 Overall Conclusion/Summary -- References -- Croatia: Supreme Court Between Individual Justice and System Management -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Supreme Court of Croatia -- 3 Revizija as a Second Appeal on Points of Law -- 4 Symptoms of Case Overload -- 5 Case Overload Solutions and Their Effectiveness -- 6 An Embrace of the Public Function of the Supreme Court? -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Part IV: Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of Appeal in England and Wales: Sharing the Appellate Load -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Structure and Practice of the Appellate Courts -- 2.1 The United Kingdom Supreme Court -- 2.1.1 The Court and Its Personnel -- 2.1.2 Appellate Jurisdiction -- 2.1.3 Permission to Appeal Requirements -- 2.1.4 Permission to Appeal and Appeal Statistics -- 2.2 The Court of Appeal -- 2.2.1 The Court and Its Personnel -- 2.2.2 Appellate Jurisdiction -- 2.2.3 Permission to Appeal Requirements. 2.2.4 Permission to Appeal and Appeal Statistics -- 3 Caseload Problems and Reform Attempts -- 3.1 No Overload in the UKSC -- 3.2 Case Overload in the Court of Appeal and Procedural Reform -- 4 Conclusion -- References -- A Happy-Go-Lucky Story: The American Supreme Court and Overload Problems -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Purpose Served by the U.S. Supreme Court -- 3 The Long Path to the Current U.S. Supreme Court Apparatus -- 4 Caseload Pressure and Institutional Evolution in the U.S. Supreme Court -- 5 Caseload Cures and Consequences in the U.S. Supreme Court -- 5.1 Expanding the Court -- 5.2 Adding Staff -- 5.3 Choosing the Cases: Limiting the Caseload via the Certiorari Decision -- 5.4 Limiting the Court´s Jurisdiction -- 5.5 The Burden of the Plenary Docket -- 5.6 A Real Caseload Crisis in the U.S. Courts of Appeals? -- 6 The Role of National Legal Culture -- 6.1 Narrowing Judicial Functions: Advisory Opinions and Political Questions -- 6.2 A Broadened View of Finality -- 6.3 Ancillary Responsibilities -- 6.4 Receptiveness to Transplants -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Case Selection and Writ of Certiorari in Argentina: `Transcendence´ as a Case-Selection Parameter at the Federal Supreme Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Filters and the Crisis of the Supreme Courts -- 2.1 `Quantitative´ Crisis -- 2.2 `Qualitative´ Crisis -- 2.3 Mechanisms to Address the Crisis -- 3 The Requirement of `Transcendence´ in the Extraordinary Appeal at the Federal Supreme Court -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 The Partial Discretion of Article 280 of the Code of Civil Procedure -- 3.3 The Requirement of `Transcendence´ and the Definition of Irrelevant Issues -- 3.3.1 Introduction: `Transcendence´ and the Institutional Role of the Supreme Court -- 3.3.2 Heterogeneity of the Supreme Court´s Roles. Variability of Parameters. Importance. 3.3.3 First Requirement to Define `Transcendence´ or `Significance´: Suitability of the Case to Allow the Supreme Court to Acc... -- 3.3.4 Second Requirement to Define `Transcendence´ or `Significance´: General Impact of Discussed Issues. Distinction Between ... -- The Direct or Indirect Scope of the Precedent -- The Size of the Group of Person Affected -- 3.3.5 Irrelevant Issues, Discretion and Verisimilitude. `Argentine Certiorari´ and the Doctrine of `Arbitrariness´ -- 4 Conclusion -- References. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910484967703321 |
| Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2021] | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Soggetto topico
-
Court congestion and delay
(9)
- Judges (4)
- Judicial districts (3)
- District courts (2)
- Justicia (2)