Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Keeping the People's Liberties : Legislators, Citizens, and Judges as Guardians of Rights / / John J. Dinan



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Dinan John J. Visualizza persona
Titolo: Keeping the People's Liberties : Legislators, Citizens, and Judges as Guardians of Rights / / John J. Dinan Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: University Press of Kansas, 1998
Lawrence (Kan.) : , : University Press of Kansas, , 1998
©1998
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (XII-259 p.)
Soggetto topico: Politique et gouvernement - États-Unis - États
Pouvoir legislatif - États-Unis
Pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis
Droits civils et politiques - États-Unis
Pouvoir constituant - États-Unis
Politics and government
Legislative power - U.S. states
Judicial power - U.S. states
Constituent power - U.S. states
Civil rights - U.S. states
Civil rights
Constituent power - United States - States
Legislative power - United States - States
Judicial power - United States - States
Civil rights - United States - States
Civil rights - United States
Soggetto geografico: United States
United States Politics and government
Soggetto non controllato: Legal history
Sommario/riassunto: Which branch of government should be entrusted with safeguarding individual rights? Conventional wisdom assigns this responsibility to the courts, on the grounds that liberty can only be protected through judicial interpretation of bills of rights. In fact it is difficult for many people even to conceive of any other way that rights might be protected. John Dinan challenges this understanding by tracing and evaluating the different methods that have been used to protect rights in the United States from the founding until the present era.By examining legislative statutes, judicial decisions, convention proceedings, and popular initiatives in four representative states—Massachusetts, Virginia, Michigan, and Oregon—Dinan shows that rights have been secured in the American polity in three principal ways. Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, rights were protected primarily through representative institutions. Then in the early twentieth century, citizens began to turn to direct democratic institutions to secure their rights. It was not until the midtwentieth century that judges came to be seen as the chief protectors of liberties.By analyzing the relative ability of legislators, citizens, and judges to serve as guardians of rights, Dinan's study demonstrates that each is capable of securing certain rights in certain situations. Elected representatives are generally capable of protecting most rights, but popular initiatives provide an effective mechanism for securing rights in the face of legislative intransigence, and judicial decisions offer a superior means of protecting liberties in crisis times. Accordingly, rather than viewing rights protection as the peculiar province of any single institution, this task ought to be considered the proper responsibility of all these institutions.By undertaking a comparison of these institutional methods across such a wide expanse of time, Keeping the People's Liberties makes a highly original contribution to the literature on rights protection and provides a new perspective on debates about the contemporary role of representative, populist, and judicial institutions.
Titolo autorizzato: Keeping the People's Liberties  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-7006-0905-9
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910482013003321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui