Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Risk propagation assessment for network security [[electronic resource] ] : application to airport communication network design / / Mohamed Slim Ben Mahmoud, Nicolas Larrieu, Alain Pirovano
| Risk propagation assessment for network security [[electronic resource] ] : application to airport communication network design / / Mohamed Slim Ben Mahmoud, Nicolas Larrieu, Alain Pirovano |
| Autore | Ben Mahmoud Mohamed Slim |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hoboken, N.J., : ISTE Ltd/John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2013 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (139 p.) |
| Disciplina | 387.740426 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
LarrieuNicolas
PirovanoAlain |
| Collana | Focus series in networks and telecommunications |
| Soggetto topico |
Computer networks - Security measures - Design
Aeronautics - Communication systems - Design and construction |
| ISBN |
1-118-57994-1
1-118-58101-6 1-299-47554-X 1-118-57873-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Title Page; Contents; LIST OF FIGURES; LIST OF TABLES; INTRODUCTION; PART 1. NETWORK SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT; CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION SYSTEMSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS; 1.1. On the importance of network security for network designers; 1.2. On the impact of risk assessment in the decision-making process for network security designers; 1.3. Quantitative versus qualitative risk assessment approaches; 1.4. Network security risk propagation concept; 1.4.1. Impact of node correlation; 1.4.2. Network security risk transitivity
1.4.3. Network security risk propagation illustrative caseCHAPTER 2. SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENTBACKGROUND; 2.1. Qualitative security risk management methods; 2.1.1. CRAMM; 2.1.2. OCTAVE; 2.1.3. EBIOS; 2.1.4. MEHARI; 2.1.5. CORAS; 2.1.6. Discussion; 2.2. Quantitative security risk assessment approaches; 2.3. Toward a quantitative propagation-based risk assessment methodology; CHAPTER 3. A QUANTITATIVE NETWORK RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY BASED ON RISK PROPAGATION; 3.1. Quantifying methodology parameters; 3.1.1. Network risk decomposition; 3.1.2. Node value; 3.1.3. Enhanced node value 3.1.4. Impact of threats3.1.5. Likelihood of threats; 3.2. Network security risk assessment process; 3.3. Conclusion; PART 2. APPLICATION TO AIRPORT COMMUNICATION NETWORK DESIGN; CHAPTER 4. THE AEROMACS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN THE SESAR PROJECT; 4.1. Overview of the European SESAR project; 4.2. Overview of aeronautical communications operating concept and requirements; 4.3. Introduction to the AeroMACS communication system; 4.3.1. AeroMACS protocol stack; 4.3.2. AeroMACS reference network architecture; 4.3.3. AeroMACS security considerations; 4.3.3.1. Analysis of AeroMACS securityweaknesses 4.3.4. AeroMACS reference network topology4.3.4.1. Isolated AeroMACS network architecture; 4.3.4.2. End-to-end AeroMACS network architecture; CHAPTER 5. AERONAUTICAL NETWORK CASE STUDY; 5.1. Experimental parameters; 5.1.1. Testbed infrastructure; 5.1.2. Aeronautical node values instantiation; 5.1.3. Aeronautical services instantiation; 5.1.4. Isolated vs. end-to-end emulation scenarios; 5.2. AeroMACS case study: experimental results; 5.2.1. Main inputs for emulation scenarios; 5.2.2. Isolated AeroMACS scenario: preliminary results; 5.2.2.1. Individual risks; 5.2.2.2. Propagated risks 5.2.2.3. Node and network risks5.2.3. Isolated AeroMACS scenario: EAP vs. RSA sub-scenario; 5.2.4. Preliminary AeroMACS security enhancement guidance; 5.2.5. AeroMACS implementation improvements: isolated scenario without operational server vulnerabilities; 5.2.5.1. Experimental inputs; 5.2.5.2. Network topology; 5.2.5.3. Vulnerability statistics; 5.2.5.4. Individual risk results; 5.2.5.5. Propagated risk results; 5.2.5.6. Network risk results; 5.2.6. AeroMACS topological improvements: isolated scenario with two ASN gateways; 5.2.6.1. Experimental inputs; 5.2.6.2. Network topology 5.2.6.3. Vulnerability statistics |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910139005803321 |
Ben Mahmoud Mohamed Slim
|
||
| Hoboken, N.J., : ISTE Ltd/John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2013 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Risk propagation assessment for network security : application to airport communication network design / / Mohamed Slim Ben Mahmoud, Nicolas Larrieu, Alain Pirovano
| Risk propagation assessment for network security : application to airport communication network design / / Mohamed Slim Ben Mahmoud, Nicolas Larrieu, Alain Pirovano |
| Autore | Ben Mahmoud Mohamed Slim |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hoboken, N.J., : ISTE Ltd/John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2013 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (139 p.) |
| Disciplina | 387.740426 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
LarrieuNicolas
PirovanoAlain |
| Collana | Focus series in networks and telecommunications |
| Soggetto topico |
Computer networks - Security measures - Design
Aeronautics - Communication systems - Design and construction |
| ISBN |
1-118-57994-1
1-118-58101-6 1-299-47554-X 1-118-57873-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Title Page; Contents; LIST OF FIGURES; LIST OF TABLES; INTRODUCTION; PART 1. NETWORK SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT; CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION SYSTEMSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS; 1.1. On the importance of network security for network designers; 1.2. On the impact of risk assessment in the decision-making process for network security designers; 1.3. Quantitative versus qualitative risk assessment approaches; 1.4. Network security risk propagation concept; 1.4.1. Impact of node correlation; 1.4.2. Network security risk transitivity
1.4.3. Network security risk propagation illustrative caseCHAPTER 2. SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENTBACKGROUND; 2.1. Qualitative security risk management methods; 2.1.1. CRAMM; 2.1.2. OCTAVE; 2.1.3. EBIOS; 2.1.4. MEHARI; 2.1.5. CORAS; 2.1.6. Discussion; 2.2. Quantitative security risk assessment approaches; 2.3. Toward a quantitative propagation-based risk assessment methodology; CHAPTER 3. A QUANTITATIVE NETWORK RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY BASED ON RISK PROPAGATION; 3.1. Quantifying methodology parameters; 3.1.1. Network risk decomposition; 3.1.2. Node value; 3.1.3. Enhanced node value 3.1.4. Impact of threats3.1.5. Likelihood of threats; 3.2. Network security risk assessment process; 3.3. Conclusion; PART 2. APPLICATION TO AIRPORT COMMUNICATION NETWORK DESIGN; CHAPTER 4. THE AEROMACS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN THE SESAR PROJECT; 4.1. Overview of the European SESAR project; 4.2. Overview of aeronautical communications operating concept and requirements; 4.3. Introduction to the AeroMACS communication system; 4.3.1. AeroMACS protocol stack; 4.3.2. AeroMACS reference network architecture; 4.3.3. AeroMACS security considerations; 4.3.3.1. Analysis of AeroMACS securityweaknesses 4.3.4. AeroMACS reference network topology4.3.4.1. Isolated AeroMACS network architecture; 4.3.4.2. End-to-end AeroMACS network architecture; CHAPTER 5. AERONAUTICAL NETWORK CASE STUDY; 5.1. Experimental parameters; 5.1.1. Testbed infrastructure; 5.1.2. Aeronautical node values instantiation; 5.1.3. Aeronautical services instantiation; 5.1.4. Isolated vs. end-to-end emulation scenarios; 5.2. AeroMACS case study: experimental results; 5.2.1. Main inputs for emulation scenarios; 5.2.2. Isolated AeroMACS scenario: preliminary results; 5.2.2.1. Individual risks; 5.2.2.2. Propagated risks 5.2.2.3. Node and network risks5.2.3. Isolated AeroMACS scenario: EAP vs. RSA sub-scenario; 5.2.4. Preliminary AeroMACS security enhancement guidance; 5.2.5. AeroMACS implementation improvements: isolated scenario without operational server vulnerabilities; 5.2.5.1. Experimental inputs; 5.2.5.2. Network topology; 5.2.5.3. Vulnerability statistics; 5.2.5.4. Individual risk results; 5.2.5.5. Propagated risk results; 5.2.5.6. Network risk results; 5.2.6. AeroMACS topological improvements: isolated scenario with two ASN gateways; 5.2.6.1. Experimental inputs; 5.2.6.2. Network topology 5.2.6.3. Vulnerability statistics |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910812555603321 |
|
Ben Mahmoud Mohamed Slim
|
||
| Hoboken, N.J., : ISTE Ltd/John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2013 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
