Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames
| Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals : guidelines for good practice / / by Irene Hames |
| Autore | Hames Irene |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Disciplina | 070.4/495 |
| Soggetto topico |
Scientific literature - Evaluation
Science - Evaluation Technical writing - Evaluation - Analysis Peer review Science - United States - Information services Avaluació d'experts Literatura científica Revistes Redacció d'escrits tècnics |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Llibres electrònics |
| ISBN |
1-281-32205-9
9786611322052 0-470-75080-4 0-470-75026-X |
| Classificazione | 02.13 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice; Contents; Foreword by Robert Campbell and Sally Morris; Preface; Chapter 1: Introduction; What should peer review do?; What does peer review assume?; What is this book trying to achieve?; Chapter 2: The peer-review process - how to get going; The basic process; The people involved in running the peer-review process; Office organization; Choice of system and procedures; Record keeping; Systems available; Chapter 3: Manuscript submission and initial checks on completeness and suitability
Submission guidance to authorsJournal scope and editorial policy; Manuscript presentation; Manuscript submission; Checking and logging of submitted manuscripts; Transfer to editor; Initial assessment of suitability and rejection without external review; Manuscripts with language problems; Chapter 4: The full review process; Identifying and selecting appropriate reviewers; Reviewer information; How to go about identifying and selecting reviewers; Finding reviewers; To invite or not?; Inviting reviewers; Responses to invitations to review Getting the manuscript and associated material to the reviewersInformation reviewers will require; Associated material needed by reviewers; Monitoring review progress; Reminding and chasing reviewers; Problems during review; Reviewers not returning reviews; Receiving and checking of returned reviews; Checking of reviews; The ethics of amending reviewer reports for authors; The 'ideal' report; Back-to-back manuscripts; Dealing with enquiries on manuscript status; Chapter 5: The decision-making process for reviewed manuscripts; The organizational structure for decision making The decision-making processDivided opinions from reviewers; The decisions that can be made; Checks to be made before communicating decisions to authors; Communicating the decision to the authors; Rebuttals and appeals from authors; Dealing with revisions; Dealing with resubmissions; Problems with resubmissions; Acceptance; Decision making to consistent standards and the problem of availability of space; Special considerations in decision making: dual-use research and the possible misuse of information; Chapter 6: Moving to online submission and review; How do you choose an online system? How to prepare to move to online workingEvaluation of current workflow and responsibilities; Specification design for the journal; Questions and text options on the site; Preparation of editorial correspondence for the online site; Health and safety issues; Training and support; Data transfer; The launch and transition period; What to expect after going live online; Impact on submission numbers; Impact on the quality of submissions; Impact on geographical origin of submissions; Impact on reviewing and administration times; Problems that may be encountered and how to deal with them Online systems are never closed |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910876618203321 |
Hames Irene
|
||
| Malden, MA ; ; Oxford, : Blackwell Pub., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Peer review in an era of evaluation : understanding the practice of gatekeeping in academia / / edited by Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke
| Peer review in an era of evaluation : understanding the practice of gatekeeping in academia / / edited by Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke |
| Edizione | [1st ed. 2022.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2022 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xix, 402 pages) : illustrations |
| Disciplina |
378
001.4 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
ForsbergEva
GeschwindLars LevanderSara WermkeWieland |
| Soggetto topico |
Peer review
Research - Evaluation Avaluació d'experts Investigació |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Llibres electrònics |
| ISBN | 3-030-75263-1 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | PART I – PEER REVIEW: INTRODUCTION AND ITS CONTEXT -- 1: The Scientific Community, Academia and Peer Review;Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind & Sara Levander -- 2: Hierarchies and Universal Inclusion in Scientific Communities; Rudolf Stichweh -- 3: Authors, peer review, and publications – a socio-historical constellation; Raf Vanderstraeten -- PART II – PEER REVIEW AND THE HIGHER EDUCATION EVALUATION MACHINERY -- 4: Performances and Gatekeepers: Quality assurance of education and research in Dutch higher education; Don F. Westerheijden -- 5: The many faces of peer review; Hanne Foss Hansen -- 6: How gatekeepers sometimes enhance the effects of evaluation machineries in research; Peter Dahler Larsen -- 7: Peer review in public administration: a contradiction in terms?; Agnes Ers & Kristina Tegler Jerselius -- PART III – SPECIFICITIES OF DIFFERENT PEER REVIEW PRACTICES -- 8: Is Peer Review Fit for Purpose?; Malcolm Tight -- 9: Peer advocacy – loyalties, wish lists and tough love in national peer review;Lars Geschwind -- 10: Many faces of scientific evaluation: use of public, professional and organizational power; Jonna Kosonen, Tea Vellamo, Taru Siekkinen & Elias Pekkola -- 11: Disciplinary boundary work - Peer-review and the (full) professorship; Eva Forsberg, Rita Foss Lindblad, Sara Levander & Sverker Lindblad -- 12: Assessing academic careers: Crafting the ‘excellent’ professor in biomedicine, economics and history; Björn Hammarfelt -- 13: Peer review in academic promotion – when teaching excellence is at stake; Maja Elmgren, Eva Forsberg, Sara Levander -- 14: Performance-based evaluation metrics – influence at the macro, meso and micro level; Gustaf Nelhans -- 15: The role of peer review in the evidence making processes of systematic review; Tine S. Prøitz & Magnus Levinsson -- Part IV – PEER REVIEW: A FINAL ACCOUNT -- Chapter 16: Peer review, an extended, challenged and migrating institution. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910520098703321 |
| Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2022 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
