The positive obligations of the state under the European Convention of Human Rights / / Dimitris Xenos |
Autore | Xenos Dimitris. |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2012 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (266 p.) |
Disciplina | 341.4/8094 |
Collana | Routledge research in human rights law |
Soggetto topico |
Human rights - Europe
International and municipal law - Europe |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
1-280-66062-7
9786613637550 0-203-80781-2 1-136-66444-0 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover; The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights; Copyright Page; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of Legal instruments; Foreword; Preface; List of abbreviations; 1. The working base; 1.1 What's right and what's wrong with positive obligations; 1.2 Overview of chapters; 1.3 Basic issues of context and subject matter; 1.3.1 The distinctiveness of human rights; 1.3.2 International responsibility and the general scope of human rights protection; 1.3.2.1 Article 1; 1.3.2.2 Title
1.3.3 The nature and structure of the Convention rights: the centrality of private life/personality as a core value1.3.4 The object and purpose of the Convention; 1.4 The doctrinal justification of positive obligations; 1.4.1 Early studies; 1.4.2 The first positive obligations cases; 1.4.2.1 X and Y; 1.4.2.2 Marchx; 1.4.2.3 Airey; 1.4.3 Subsequent studies; 1.4.3.1 The horizontality issue: forced or dangerous?; 1.4.4 The substantive debate: the co(i)nstitutional guarantees; 1.4.4.1 The national constitutional debate; 1.4.4.2 The drittwirkung proposal 1.4.4.3 The international debate: international responses to international phemomena1.5 The on-going debate: re-evaluating the subsidiary function of the court; 2. The application and development of positive obligations; 2.1 Establishing the distinctive nature and potential of positive obligations in the current reasoned phase of the jurisprudence; 2.1.1 The merging of positive and negative obligations: the fair balance test; 2.1.2 The proposal to determine positive obligations under the paragraph 2 provisions; 2.1.3 The stages before the balance test 2.1.4 A firm distinction between positive and negative obligations2.1.5 The perspective of human rights protection: the rule or the exception - the contextual or the ad hoc response?; 2.2 The wider and common justification of the state's obligations: the critical element of knowledge of the need of human rights; 2.2.1 The element of knowledge in negative obligations cases; 2.2.1.1 Express knowledge from direct interference with known results; 2.2.1.2 Implied knowledge from incidental interference withknown or predictable results 2.2.1.3 Express or implied knowledge by context and comparative examples2.2.1.4 Express knowledge from express complaints; 2.2.1.5 Express knowledge from previous decisions of non-justifiability of the interference; 2.2.2 The element of knowledge in positive obligations cases; 2.2.2.1 Implied knowledge from a known context of private parties' interactions; 2.2.2.2 Implied knowledge from previous incidents or comparative examples; 2.2.2.3 Express knowledge of an identifiable threat; 2.2.2.4 Express knowledge from express complaints; 2.2.3 The autonomy of the element of knowledge 2.3 The content of positive obligations under paragraph 1 of the Convention rights |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910451636403321 |
Xenos Dimitris.
![]() |
||
Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2012 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
The positive obligations of the state under the European Convention of Human Rights / / Dimitris Xenos |
Autore | Xenos Dimitris. |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2012 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (266 p.) |
Disciplina | 341.4/8094 |
Collana | Routledge research in human rights law |
Soggetto topico |
Human rights - Europe
International and municipal law - Europe |
ISBN |
1-136-66443-2
1-280-66062-7 9786613637550 0-203-80781-2 1-136-66444-0 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover; The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights; Copyright Page; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of Legal instruments; Foreword; Preface; List of abbreviations; 1. The working base; 1.1 What's right and what's wrong with positive obligations; 1.2 Overview of chapters; 1.3 Basic issues of context and subject matter; 1.3.1 The distinctiveness of human rights; 1.3.2 International responsibility and the general scope of human rights protection; 1.3.2.1 Article 1; 1.3.2.2 Title
1.3.3 The nature and structure of the Convention rights: the centrality of private life/personality as a core value1.3.4 The object and purpose of the Convention; 1.4 The doctrinal justification of positive obligations; 1.4.1 Early studies; 1.4.2 The first positive obligations cases; 1.4.2.1 X and Y; 1.4.2.2 Marchx; 1.4.2.3 Airey; 1.4.3 Subsequent studies; 1.4.3.1 The horizontality issue: forced or dangerous?; 1.4.4 The substantive debate: the co(i)nstitutional guarantees; 1.4.4.1 The national constitutional debate; 1.4.4.2 The drittwirkung proposal 1.4.4.3 The international debate: international responses to international phemomena1.5 The on-going debate: re-evaluating the subsidiary function of the court; 2. The application and development of positive obligations; 2.1 Establishing the distinctive nature and potential of positive obligations in the current reasoned phase of the jurisprudence; 2.1.1 The merging of positive and negative obligations: the fair balance test; 2.1.2 The proposal to determine positive obligations under the paragraph 2 provisions; 2.1.3 The stages before the balance test 2.1.4 A firm distinction between positive and negative obligations2.1.5 The perspective of human rights protection: the rule or the exception - the contextual or the ad hoc response?; 2.2 The wider and common justification of the state's obligations: the critical element of knowledge of the need of human rights; 2.2.1 The element of knowledge in negative obligations cases; 2.2.1.1 Express knowledge from direct interference with known results; 2.2.1.2 Implied knowledge from incidental interference withknown or predictable results 2.2.1.3 Express or implied knowledge by context and comparative examples2.2.1.4 Express knowledge from express complaints; 2.2.1.5 Express knowledge from previous decisions of non-justifiability of the interference; 2.2.2 The element of knowledge in positive obligations cases; 2.2.2.1 Implied knowledge from a known context of private parties' interactions; 2.2.2.2 Implied knowledge from previous incidents or comparative examples; 2.2.2.3 Express knowledge of an identifiable threat; 2.2.2.4 Express knowledge from express complaints; 2.2.3 The autonomy of the element of knowledge 2.3 The content of positive obligations under paragraph 1 of the Convention rights |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910779024603321 |
Xenos Dimitris.
![]() |
||
Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2012 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|