Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene
| Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene |
| Autore | Verschuuren Jonathan |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Bristol : , : Bristol University Press, , 2025 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (0 pages) |
| Disciplina | 363.7 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
DaviesGareth
HuhtaKaisa HolzerKateryna YaminevaYulia ZhangHao FlemingRuven PailmanKelsey AlessandriniMirta van ZebenJosephine |
| Soggetto topico |
Climate change mitigation
Climatic changes - Law and legislation |
| ISBN | 1-5292-3291-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover -- Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Notes on Contributors -- Acknowledgements -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Aim of this book -- 1.2 Chapter overview -- 1.2.1 Climate technologies -- 1.2.2 The broader normative context -- 1.3 Conclusion -- PART 1 Climate Technologies -- 2 Are Renewable Energy Technologies Compatible with Biodiversity Conservation? The Energy-.Conservation Legal Nexus -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The RE/biodiversity conservation trade-off -- 2.3 The nexus of energy law and conservation law -- 2.4 The RE-.conservation trade-.off in the Green New Deal and Green Deal -- 2.4.1 United States -- 2.4.2 European Union -- 2.4.2.1 RE targets -- 2.4.2.2 Shifting the nexus: from 'climate' to 'security' -- 2.4.2.3 RED III -- 2.4.2.4 Permit-.granting process in 'renewables acceleration areas' -- 2.4.2.5 Permit-.granting process outside renewables acceleration areas -- 2.4.2.6 Regulation 2022/2577 to accelerate the European transition toward RE -- 2.4.2.7 Nature Restoration Law -- 2.5 Conclusion -- Funding acknowledgment -- 3 Ambition in Nationally Determined Contributions: The Case of Hydropower -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Power dams in NDCs -- 3.2.1 Preliminary observations -- 3.2.2 The major players -- 3.2.3 Lesser promoters -- 3.2.4 Brazil -- 3.3 Will power dams deliver the promised additional mitigation? -- 4 An Essential Zero-Carbon Solution or a Perilous Energy Technology? Exploring the Nuclear Debate in EU Law -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reviewing the facts and arguments of the nuclear debate -- 4.2.1 Core reasons against nuclear energy: an unsafe and risky energy form that should not be used in the modern world -- 4.2.2 Core reasons in favour of nuclear energy: a necessary energy technology to support the low-.carbon transition and supply.
4.3 The legal side of the nuclear debate: 60+ years of nuclear law in the EU -- 4.3.1 Constitutional foundations: Euratom and the EU member states' right to choose their energy mix -- 4.3.2 The nuclear debate playing out in case-law: opposing nuclear energy is not an argument that can be won in the EU courts -- 4.4 Legislative developments in the EU nuclear debate -- 4.5 Concluding thoughts -- Acknowledgement -- 5 Critical Raw Materials in the Anthropocene: Regulatory Perspectives on their Promise and Pitfalls -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 CRMs in the low-carbon transition: balancing the promise and pitfalls of the regulatory complexities -- 5.2.1 Unpacking the dynamic CRM landscape: key facts -- 5.2.2 Emerging challenges associated with CRMs -- 5.2.3 The legal and regulatory context of CRMs -- 5.2.4 The development of CRM-specific regulatory frameworks -- 5.3 Contrasting perspectives on CRMs in the Anthropocene -- 5.3.1 Overcoming the imminent challenge: sustainable regulation of CRMs -- 5.3.2 Striking a balance: a safe operating space for CRMs? -- 5.4 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 6 Hydrogen: What Does its Deployment at Speed and Scale Mean for Legal Systems? -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Current status: literature review on hydrogen regulation -- 6.2.1 Hydrogen production: defining the transition -- 6.2.2 Hydrogen transmission and distribution: transporting the transition -- 6.2.3 Hydrogen customer end-use: (em)powering the transition -- 6.3 Three central battlegrounds for the creation and implementation of hydrogen-specific legislation -- 6.3.1 Who owns the hydrogen grids? State-owned grid company vs private companies (and who pays for them?) -- 6.3.2 Hydrogen in the heating sector -- 6.3.3 What actually is sustainable in green, clean and renewable hydrogen? -- 6.4 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement. 7 Genetically Modified Organisms: Is the Proof in the Pudding or in the Process? -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Defining GMOs legally -- 7.2.1 Defining the definition -- 7.2.2 Applying definitions -- 7.2.3 State of the debate -- 7.3 Managing uncertainty: risk and the precautionary principle -- 7.3.1 The risk-precaution dichotomy -- 7.3.2 State of the debate -- 7.4 GMOs in food security and sustainable agriculture -- 7.4.1 Feeding tomorrow's world in a more sustainable way? -- 7.4.2 State of the debate -- 7.5 Conclusions and outlook -- 8 Cultivated Meat and Dairy as a Game-Changing Technology in the Agricultural and Food Transition in the EU: What Role for -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Impact of meat and dairy and the need for a food transition -- 8.3 Current and proposed regulatory approaches to reducing emissions from livestock in the EU: pollution control, climate change mitigation, agricultural income support -- 8.4 What is cultivated meat and dairy and what are the benefits and pitfalls? -- 8.5 What role for law? -- 8.5.1 Regulatory approaches to reduce meat and dairy production and consumption -- 8.5.2 Regulatory approaches to stimulate production and consumption of cultivated meat and dairy -- 8.5.3 Regulatory approaches to guide safe, nutritious, fair and sustainable production of cultivated meat and dairy -- 8.6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 9 Regulating Geoengineering -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Regulating geoengineering: a naive approach -- 9.3 Geoengineering as a political act -- 9.3.1 Attitudes to geoengineering -- 9.3.2 The emergence of scientific 'solutionism' -- 9.3.3 Hostility to geoengineering -- 9.3.3.1 Geoenginering is dangerous -- 9.3.3.2 Geoengineering is speculative -- 9.3.3.3 Taking geoengineering seriously undermines emission reduction -- 9.3.4 Geoengineering tries to rescue capitalism. 9.3.5 Geoengineering disrupts the professional status quo -- 9.4 Rethinking regulation of geoengineering -- 10 Why Researching Solar Radiation Management Technologies Is Essential and Governable -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 The potential benefits and risks of SRM -- 10.3 Refuting the arguments opposing SRM R& -- D -- 10.3.1 Claim 1: SRM research creates a moral hazard -- 10.3.2 Claim 2: The blurred line between SRM research and deployment -- 10.3.3 Claim 3: SRM is ungovernable -- 10.3.4 Claim 4: SRM poses insurmountable risks of unilateral deployment -- 10.4 The international community should avoid choosing to live in ignorance of SRM -- 10.5 Conclusion -- 11 Whither Law and Regulation on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technology? A Comparative Analysis -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 International and jurisdictional regulatory frameworks for CCS -- 11.2.1 CCS and international law -- 11.2.2 CCS development and regulatory framework in the EU -- 11.2.3 CCS development and regulatory framework in China -- 11.3 Legal and regulatory obstacles for CCS development -- 11.3.1 Inadequate incorporation of CCS into climate mitigation strategies -- 11.3.2 Legal barriers hindering the advancement of CCS -- 11.3.3 Absence of universally recognized regulatory frameworks underpinned by international law -- 11.4 Insights for climate technology-law interface in the context of climate emergency -- 11.5 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 12 Evidence-Based Climate Law? The Case of Carbon Capture, Use and Storage -- 12.1 A significant expansion of carbon capture, use and storage as part of climate law and regulation? -- 12.2 Knowledge resources for climate law -- 12.2.1 Why focus on evidence about the economics of climate-mitigation technologies? -- 12.2.2 Insights from the literature on evidence-based public policy making and regulation. 12.2.3 Two insights from STS : boundary objects and a non-instrumental conception of technology -- 12.3 Should states intervene in private business activity to promote CCUS? -- 12.3.1 Is CCUS necessary but too costly for the private sector to implement it alone? -- 12.3.2 How does the UK government propose to intervene in private economic activity to promote CCUS? -- 12.3.2.1 Providing financial support for CO2 transport and storage companies -- 12.3.2.2 Revenue support for CO2 capture from industry and hydrogen production -- 12.4 Parts 1 and 2 of the Energy Act 2023: boundary objects? -- 12.4.1 Interpretative flexibility -- 12.4.2 Linking unstructured features to locally tailored uses -- 12.4.3 Coordination in the absence of agreement between actors -- 12.5 CCUS as limiting radical transformation of energy and production systems? -- 12.5.1 Does CCUS promote fossil fuel 'lock-in' and 'unlocking'? -- 12.5.2 Limiting the circular economy and democratically controlled renewable-energy projects? -- 12.5.3 Limiting the development of small-scale democratically controlled renewable-energy community projects? -- 12.6 Conclusion: Legal rules as boundary objects mitigating evidence deficits about the costs of CCUS? -- 13 Nature-Based Climate Solutions and the Rights of Nature: A Conundrum of Values -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 NBCS, NC and ecosystem services -- 13.3 Posthumanism and RoN -- 13.4 Integrating aspects of RoN into NBCS -- 13.5 Conclusion -- 14 Ban on Coal: Rationale and Legality for Restrictions on Coal Production, Sale and Use -- 14.1 Introduction -- 14.2 Coal as an energy source -- 14.3 Climate restrictions on coal in international law and governance -- 14.3.1 International air pollution regulation -- 14.3.2 International climate change law -- 14.3.3 Informal coal phase-out governance -- 14.3.4 Would an internationally imposed ban be possible?. 14.4 Restrictions on coal production, sale and use in national legislation and policy. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9911012678303321 |
Verschuuren Jonathan
|
||
| Bristol : , : Bristol University Press, , 2025 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene
| Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene |
| Autore | Verschuuren Jonathan |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Bristol : , : Bristol University Press, , 2025 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (0 pages) |
| Disciplina | 363.7 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
DaviesGareth
HuhtaKaisa HolzerKateryna YaminevaYulia ZhangHao FlemingRuven PailmanKelsey AlessandriniMirta van ZebenJosephine |
| Soggetto topico |
Climate change mitigation
Climatic changes - Law and legislation |
| ISBN | 1-5292-3291-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Front Cover -- Climate Technology and Law in the Anthropocene -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Notes on Contributors -- Acknowledgements -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Aim of this book -- 1.2 Chapter overview -- 1.2.1 Climate technologies -- 1.2.2 The broader normative context -- 1.3 Conclusion -- PART 1 Climate Technologies -- 2 Are Renewable Energy Technologies Compatible with Biodiversity Conservation? The Energy-.Conservation Legal Nexus -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The RE/biodiversity conservation trade-off -- 2.3 The nexus of energy law and conservation law -- 2.4 The RE-.conservation trade-.off in the Green New Deal and Green Deal -- 2.4.1 United States -- 2.4.2 European Union -- 2.4.2.1 RE targets -- 2.4.2.2 Shifting the nexus: from 'climate' to 'security' -- 2.4.2.3 RED III -- 2.4.2.4 Permit-.granting process in 'renewables acceleration areas' -- 2.4.2.5 Permit-.granting process outside renewables acceleration areas -- 2.4.2.6 Regulation 2022/2577 to accelerate the European transition toward RE -- 2.4.2.7 Nature Restoration Law -- 2.5 Conclusion -- Funding acknowledgment -- 3 Ambition in Nationally Determined Contributions: The Case of Hydropower -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Power dams in NDCs -- 3.2.1 Preliminary observations -- 3.2.2 The major players -- 3.2.3 Lesser promoters -- 3.2.4 Brazil -- 3.3 Will power dams deliver the promised additional mitigation? -- 4 An Essential Zero-Carbon Solution or a Perilous Energy Technology? Exploring the Nuclear Debate in EU Law -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reviewing the facts and arguments of the nuclear debate -- 4.2.1 Core reasons against nuclear energy: an unsafe and risky energy form that should not be used in the modern world -- 4.2.2 Core reasons in favour of nuclear energy: a necessary energy technology to support the low-.carbon transition and supply.
4.3 The legal side of the nuclear debate: 60+ years of nuclear law in the EU -- 4.3.1 Constitutional foundations: Euratom and the EU member states' right to choose their energy mix -- 4.3.2 The nuclear debate playing out in case-law: opposing nuclear energy is not an argument that can be won in the EU courts -- 4.4 Legislative developments in the EU nuclear debate -- 4.5 Concluding thoughts -- Acknowledgement -- 5 Critical Raw Materials in the Anthropocene: Regulatory Perspectives on their Promise and Pitfalls -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 CRMs in the low-carbon transition: balancing the promise and pitfalls of the regulatory complexities -- 5.2.1 Unpacking the dynamic CRM landscape: key facts -- 5.2.2 Emerging challenges associated with CRMs -- 5.2.3 The legal and regulatory context of CRMs -- 5.2.4 The development of CRM-specific regulatory frameworks -- 5.3 Contrasting perspectives on CRMs in the Anthropocene -- 5.3.1 Overcoming the imminent challenge: sustainable regulation of CRMs -- 5.3.2 Striking a balance: a safe operating space for CRMs? -- 5.4 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 6 Hydrogen: What Does its Deployment at Speed and Scale Mean for Legal Systems? -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Current status: literature review on hydrogen regulation -- 6.2.1 Hydrogen production: defining the transition -- 6.2.2 Hydrogen transmission and distribution: transporting the transition -- 6.2.3 Hydrogen customer end-use: (em)powering the transition -- 6.3 Three central battlegrounds for the creation and implementation of hydrogen-specific legislation -- 6.3.1 Who owns the hydrogen grids? State-owned grid company vs private companies (and who pays for them?) -- 6.3.2 Hydrogen in the heating sector -- 6.3.3 What actually is sustainable in green, clean and renewable hydrogen? -- 6.4 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement. 7 Genetically Modified Organisms: Is the Proof in the Pudding or in the Process? -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Defining GMOs legally -- 7.2.1 Defining the definition -- 7.2.2 Applying definitions -- 7.2.3 State of the debate -- 7.3 Managing uncertainty: risk and the precautionary principle -- 7.3.1 The risk-precaution dichotomy -- 7.3.2 State of the debate -- 7.4 GMOs in food security and sustainable agriculture -- 7.4.1 Feeding tomorrow's world in a more sustainable way? -- 7.4.2 State of the debate -- 7.5 Conclusions and outlook -- 8 Cultivated Meat and Dairy as a Game-Changing Technology in the Agricultural and Food Transition in the EU: What Role for -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Impact of meat and dairy and the need for a food transition -- 8.3 Current and proposed regulatory approaches to reducing emissions from livestock in the EU: pollution control, climate change mitigation, agricultural income support -- 8.4 What is cultivated meat and dairy and what are the benefits and pitfalls? -- 8.5 What role for law? -- 8.5.1 Regulatory approaches to reduce meat and dairy production and consumption -- 8.5.2 Regulatory approaches to stimulate production and consumption of cultivated meat and dairy -- 8.5.3 Regulatory approaches to guide safe, nutritious, fair and sustainable production of cultivated meat and dairy -- 8.6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 9 Regulating Geoengineering -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Regulating geoengineering: a naive approach -- 9.3 Geoengineering as a political act -- 9.3.1 Attitudes to geoengineering -- 9.3.2 The emergence of scientific 'solutionism' -- 9.3.3 Hostility to geoengineering -- 9.3.3.1 Geoenginering is dangerous -- 9.3.3.2 Geoengineering is speculative -- 9.3.3.3 Taking geoengineering seriously undermines emission reduction -- 9.3.4 Geoengineering tries to rescue capitalism. 9.3.5 Geoengineering disrupts the professional status quo -- 9.4 Rethinking regulation of geoengineering -- 10 Why Researching Solar Radiation Management Technologies Is Essential and Governable -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 The potential benefits and risks of SRM -- 10.3 Refuting the arguments opposing SRM R& -- D -- 10.3.1 Claim 1: SRM research creates a moral hazard -- 10.3.2 Claim 2: The blurred line between SRM research and deployment -- 10.3.3 Claim 3: SRM is ungovernable -- 10.3.4 Claim 4: SRM poses insurmountable risks of unilateral deployment -- 10.4 The international community should avoid choosing to live in ignorance of SRM -- 10.5 Conclusion -- 11 Whither Law and Regulation on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technology? A Comparative Analysis -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 International and jurisdictional regulatory frameworks for CCS -- 11.2.1 CCS and international law -- 11.2.2 CCS development and regulatory framework in the EU -- 11.2.3 CCS development and regulatory framework in China -- 11.3 Legal and regulatory obstacles for CCS development -- 11.3.1 Inadequate incorporation of CCS into climate mitigation strategies -- 11.3.2 Legal barriers hindering the advancement of CCS -- 11.3.3 Absence of universally recognized regulatory frameworks underpinned by international law -- 11.4 Insights for climate technology-law interface in the context of climate emergency -- 11.5 Conclusion -- Acknowledgement -- 12 Evidence-Based Climate Law? The Case of Carbon Capture, Use and Storage -- 12.1 A significant expansion of carbon capture, use and storage as part of climate law and regulation? -- 12.2 Knowledge resources for climate law -- 12.2.1 Why focus on evidence about the economics of climate-mitigation technologies? -- 12.2.2 Insights from the literature on evidence-based public policy making and regulation. 12.2.3 Two insights from STS : boundary objects and a non-instrumental conception of technology -- 12.3 Should states intervene in private business activity to promote CCUS? -- 12.3.1 Is CCUS necessary but too costly for the private sector to implement it alone? -- 12.3.2 How does the UK government propose to intervene in private economic activity to promote CCUS? -- 12.3.2.1 Providing financial support for CO2 transport and storage companies -- 12.3.2.2 Revenue support for CO2 capture from industry and hydrogen production -- 12.4 Parts 1 and 2 of the Energy Act 2023: boundary objects? -- 12.4.1 Interpretative flexibility -- 12.4.2 Linking unstructured features to locally tailored uses -- 12.4.3 Coordination in the absence of agreement between actors -- 12.5 CCUS as limiting radical transformation of energy and production systems? -- 12.5.1 Does CCUS promote fossil fuel 'lock-in' and 'unlocking'? -- 12.5.2 Limiting the circular economy and democratically controlled renewable-energy projects? -- 12.5.3 Limiting the development of small-scale democratically controlled renewable-energy community projects? -- 12.6 Conclusion: Legal rules as boundary objects mitigating evidence deficits about the costs of CCUS? -- 13 Nature-Based Climate Solutions and the Rights of Nature: A Conundrum of Values -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 NBCS, NC and ecosystem services -- 13.3 Posthumanism and RoN -- 13.4 Integrating aspects of RoN into NBCS -- 13.5 Conclusion -- 14 Ban on Coal: Rationale and Legality for Restrictions on Coal Production, Sale and Use -- 14.1 Introduction -- 14.2 Coal as an energy source -- 14.3 Climate restrictions on coal in international law and governance -- 14.3.1 International air pollution regulation -- 14.3.2 International climate change law -- 14.3.3 Informal coal phase-out governance -- 14.3.4 Would an internationally imposed ban be possible?. 14.4 Restrictions on coal production, sale and use in national legislation and policy. |
| Record Nr. | UNISA-996670482203316 |
|
Verschuuren Jonathan
|
||
| Bristol : , : Bristol University Press, , 2025 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. di Salerno | ||
| ||