Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Balancing privacy and free speech : unwanted attention in the age of social media / / Mark Tunick
| Balancing privacy and free speech : unwanted attention in the age of social media / / Mark Tunick |
| Autore | Tunick Mark |
| Edizione | [1 ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Taylor & Francis, 2015 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xiv, 222 pages) |
| Disciplina | 323.44/8 |
| Collana | Routledge Research in Information Technology and E-Commerce Law |
| Soggetto topico |
Social media - Law and legislation
Privacy, Right of Freedom of expression |
| Soggetto non controllato |
free speech
internet governance legal ethics media privacy social media |
| ISBN |
1-317-65036-0
1-315-76313-3 1-317-65037-9 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Table of cases -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction -- Unwanted attention -- The democratization of the media -- Permissible and impermissible speech -- Goals: Building a framework for addressing conflicts between privacy and free speech ; Formulating principles of privacy ethics ; Grounding privacy ; Reevaluating case law ; Distinguishing ethical and legal judgments -- The book's layout -- 2. The value of privacy -- Defining privacy -- Why privacy is valuable: Reputation ; Avoiding unjust punishment, and the "right to be forgotten" ; Property ; A lack of privacy is objectively harmful ; Intimacy, relational harms, and the need to compartmentalize ; No harm no foul? ; Trust ; Dignity and respect for persons ; Privacy, toleration, and community -- Summary -- 3. Legitimate privacy interests -- Terminology: legitimate privacy interests and reasonable expectations of privacy -- The plain view principle, modified -- Which means of observation are legitimate? -- the careful and carefree societies -- Qualifying the plain view principle: One may reasonably expect privacy when one's dignity is implicated ; One can have a legitimate privacy interest that information not be spread to circles wider than one willingly exposed oneself to ; Controlling the intended audience of one's message ; Clarifying what counts as "readily accessible through legitimate means" ; Consent -- Conclusion: privacy in public places -- 4. The value of free speech -- Reasons free speech is valuable -- Should interests in free speech be put on a balancing scale?: The E.U. vs the U.S. -- The slippery slope objection to protecting only some speech -- The speech that merits legal protection -- Do legal protections of free speech apply only to professional journalists? -- Deciding what is newsworthy: Substitutability (Finger and Kim Phuc) ; Non-newsworthy details of a newsworthy event (Y.G and L.G.) ; Newsworthy for a select group, non-newsworthy for the general public (Parnigoni) -- Conclusion -- 5. Balancing privacy and free speech: Utilitarianism, its limits, and tolerating the sensitive -- Introduction -- The framework: Interests and rights ; Balancing privacy against free speech (as opposed to public safety) ; The utilitarian approach ; Limits of a utilitarian approach -- Feasibility problems -- The respect and dignity problem -- Toleration and respect for persons -- Weighing reasons and considerations without making a utilitarian calculation -- 6. Cases -- Publicizing private facts: Private facts in private places (Rear Window, Lake v. Wal-Mart) ; Private facts that are newsworthy (Alvarado, Kaysen) ; Private facts in public places (Upskirt videos, Dennison, Turnbull) -- Cases at the border (Riley, Vazquez, and Wood) -- Publicizing public facts: Public facts that are not newsworthy (the baseball fan) ; Publicizing newsworthy public facts (Public meetings and lectures, police conduct, arrests) -- 7. Remedies -- Google Glass with face recognition -- Remedies: New social norms ; Legal remedies and their limits -- Other alternatives -- Technology and architecture -- Market solutions and their limits -- Conclusion. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910545199403321 |
Tunick Mark
|
||
| Taylor & Francis, 2015 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Punishment : theory and practice / / Mark Tunick [[electronic resource]]
| Punishment : theory and practice / / Mark Tunick [[electronic resource]] |
| Autore | Tunick Mark |
| Edizione | [Reprint 2020] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berkeley, : University of California Press, c1992 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (ix, 211 p. ) |
| Disciplina |
345/.077
342.577 |
| Soggetto topico | Punishment |
| ISBN |
0-520-91231-4
0-585-04385-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Contents -- Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Radical Criticisms of the Practice of Legal Punishment -- 3. Justifications of the Practice: Utilitarian and Retributive -- 4. Retributive Immanent Criticism of Legal Punishment -- 5. Immanent Criticism of an Essentially Contested Practice -- Appendix -- Bibliography -- Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910495878603321 |
|
Tunick Mark
|
||
| Berkeley, : University of California Press, c1992 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||