Balancing privacy and free speech : unwanted attention in the age of social media / / Mark Tunick |
Autore | Tunick Mark |
Edizione | [1 ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Taylor & Francis, 2015 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xiv, 222 pages) |
Disciplina |
323.44/8
323.448 |
Collana | Routledge Research in Information Technology and E-Commerce Law |
Soggetto topico |
Social media - Law and legislation
Privacy, Right of Freedom of expression |
ISBN |
9781317650362
1317650360 9781315763132 1315763133 9781317650379 1317650379 |
Classificazione | LAW036000LAW096000LAW116000 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | Table of cases -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction -- Unwanted attention -- The democratization of the media -- Permissible and impermissible speech -- Goals: Building a framework for addressing conflicts between privacy and free speech ; Formulating principles of privacy ethics ; Grounding privacy ; Reevaluating case law ; Distinguishing ethical and legal judgments -- The book's layout -- 2. The value of privacy -- Defining privacy -- Why privacy is valuable: Reputation ; Avoiding unjust punishment, and the "right to be forgotten" ; Property ; A lack of privacy is objectively harmful ; Intimacy, relational harms, and the need to compartmentalize ; No harm no foul? ; Trust ; Dignity and respect for persons ; Privacy, toleration, and community -- Summary -- 3. Legitimate privacy interests -- Terminology: legitimate privacy interests and reasonable expectations of privacy -- The plain view principle, modified -- Which means of observation are legitimate? -- the careful and carefree societies -- Qualifying the plain view principle: One may reasonably expect privacy when one's dignity is implicated ; One can have a legitimate privacy interest that information not be spread to circles wider than one willingly exposed oneself to ; Controlling the intended audience of one's message ; Clarifying what counts as "readily accessible through legitimate means" ; Consent -- Conclusion: privacy in public places -- 4. The value of free speech -- Reasons free speech is valuable -- Should interests in free speech be put on a balancing scale?: The E.U. vs the U.S. -- The slippery slope objection to protecting only some speech -- The speech that merits legal protection -- Do legal protections of free speech apply only to professional journalists? -- Deciding what is newsworthy: Substitutability (Finger and Kim Phuc) ; Non-newsworthy details of a newsworthy event (Y.G and L.G.) ; Newsworthy for a select group, non-newsworthy for the general public (Parnigoni) -- Conclusion -- 5. Balancing privacy and free speech: Utilitarianism, its limits, and tolerating the sensitive -- Introduction -- The framework: Interests and rights ; Balancing privacy against free speech (as opposed to public safety) ; The utilitarian approach ; Limits of a utilitarian approach -- Feasibility problems -- The respect and dignity problem -- Toleration and respect for persons -- Weighing reasons and considerations without making a utilitarian calculation -- 6. Cases -- Publicizing private facts: Private facts in private places (Rear Window, Lake v. Wal-Mart) ; Private facts that are newsworthy (Alvarado, Kaysen) ; Private facts in public places (Upskirt videos, Dennison, Turnbull) -- Cases at the border (Riley, Vazquez, and Wood) -- Publicizing public facts: Public facts that are not newsworthy (the baseball fan) ; Publicizing newsworthy public facts (Public meetings and lectures, police conduct, arrests) -- 7. Remedies -- Google Glass with face recognition -- Remedies: New social norms ; Legal remedies and their limits -- Other alternatives -- Technology and architecture -- Market solutions and their limits -- Conclusion. |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910545199403321 |
Tunick Mark
![]() |
||
Taylor & Francis, 2015 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Punishment : theory and practice / / Mark Tunick [[electronic resource]] |
Autore | Tunick Mark |
Edizione | [Reprint 2020] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berkeley, : University of California Press, c1992 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (ix, 211 p. ) |
Disciplina |
345/.077
342.577 |
Soggetto topico | Punishment |
ISBN |
0-520-91231-4
0-585-04385-X |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | Front matter -- Contents -- Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Radical Criticisms of the Practice of Legal Punishment -- 3. Justifications of the Practice: Utilitarian and Retributive -- 4. Retributive Immanent Criticism of Legal Punishment -- 5. Immanent Criticism of an Essentially Contested Practice -- Appendix -- Bibliography -- Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910495878603321 |
Tunick Mark
![]() |
||
Berkeley, : University of California Press, c1992 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|