Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6403-0
1-281-25865-2 9786611258658 1-84731-375-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910450901603321 |
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers
| Fair trials : the European criminal procedural tradition and the European Court of Human Rights / Sarah J. Summers |
| Autore | Summers Sarah J. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (209 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.4056 |
| Collana | Criminal law library |
| Soggetto topico |
Fair trial - Europe
Criminal procedure - Europe |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6403-0
1-281-25865-2 9786611258658 1-84731-375-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Part One -- 1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure -- AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial -- Accusatorial Divide -- BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism -- CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law -- 2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century -- BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CJudicial Impartiality -- (i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in -- France and Germany -- (ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the -- Examination of the Evidence -- (iii) Institutional Impartiality -- DThe Public Hearing Requirement -- EImmediate and Oral Proceedings -- (i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial -- (ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and -- Submitted in Writing -- (iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial -- System -- FConclusions -- 3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century -- AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused' -- BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial -- (i)The Presence of the Accused -- (ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused -- (a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party -- (b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century -- (c) The Assistance of Counsel -- CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase -- (i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative' -- (a) The Questioning of the Accused -- (b) The Examination of Evidence -- (ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation -- DConclusions -- Part Two -- 4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine -- DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the -- Equality of Arms -- EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in -- Criminal Proceedings -- (i)The Right to be Present at Trial -- (ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions -- (iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions -- FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution -- GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms -- 5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR -- AIntroduction -- BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence -- CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview -- DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d) -- (i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses? -- (a) The Identity of the Witness -- (b) The Importance of the Witness -- (ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined? -- EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence -- FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the -- 'Accusatorial Trinity' -- (i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses -- (ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses -- (iii)Immediacy -- G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- (i) Improper Compulsion -- (ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion -- (iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel -- (iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase -- HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial' -- (i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna -- (ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires -- (iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition -- 6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms -- AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights -- BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms -- CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition -- DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910784725003321 |
|
Summers Sarah J.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||