Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Research ethics for scientists [[electronic resource] ] : a companion for students / / C. Neal Stewart Jr
| Research ethics for scientists [[electronic resource] ] : a companion for students / / C. Neal Stewart Jr |
| Autore | Stewart C. Neal |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (226 p.) |
| Disciplina | 174/.95 |
| Soggetto topico |
Research - Moral and ethical aspects
Scientists - Professional ethics |
| ISBN |
1-119-97986-2
1-283-27982-7 9786613279828 1-119-97887-4 1-119-97886-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Research Ethicsfor Scientists; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements and Dedication; Chapter 1 Research Ethics: The Best Ethical Practices Produce the Best Science; Judge yourself; Morality vs ethics; Inauspicious beginnings; How science works; Summary; Judge yourself redux; Chapter 2 How Corrupt is Science?; Judge yourself; "Scientists behaving badly"; Do scientists behave worse with experience?; Judge yourself; Crime and punishment; Judge yourself; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 3 Plagiarise and Perish; Ideas; Sentences; Phrases
A hoppy exampleWhat is plagiarism, really?; Judge yourself; How many consecutive identical and uncited words constitute plagiarism?; Self-plagiarism and recycling; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Tools to discover plagiarism; Self-plagiarism and ethics revisited; Judge yourself; Is plagiarism getting worse?; The case of the plagiarising graduate student; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 4 Finding the Perfect Mentor; Caveat; Choosing a mentor; Judge yourself; Choosing a graduate project; Judge yourself; Mentors for assistant professors How to train your mentorChoosing the right research project: the new graduate student's dilemma; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 5 Becoming the Perfect Mentor; Grants and contracts are a prerequisite to productive science; Judge yourself; Publications are the fruit of research; On a personal level; Judge yourself; Common and predictable mistakes scientist make at key stages in their training and careers and how being a good mentor can make improvements; Questions; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 6 Research Misconduct: Fabricating Data Why cheat?Judge yourself; The case of Jan Hendrick Sch ̈on, "Plastic Fantastic"; The case of Woo-Suk Hwang: dog cloner, data fabricator; Judge yourself; Detection of image and data misrepresentation; Judge yourself; Neither here nor there - the curious case of Homme Hellinga; Judge yourself; Lessons learnt; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 7 Research Misconduct: Falsification and Whistleblowing; A "can of worms" indeed: the case of Elizabeth "Betsy" Goodwin; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Judge yourself Deal with ethical quandaries informally if possibleJudge yourself; Cultivating a culture of openness, integrity, and accountability; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 8 Authorship: Who's an Author on a Scientific Paper and Why; The importance of the scientific publication; Judge yourself; Who should be listed as an author on a scientific paper?; Judge yourself; How to avoid author quandaries; Authorship for works other than research papers The difference between authorship on scientific papers and inventorship on patents |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910137967403321 |
Stewart C. Neal
|
||
| Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Research ethics for scientists [[electronic resource] ] : a companion for students / / C. Neal Stewart Jr
| Research ethics for scientists [[electronic resource] ] : a companion for students / / C. Neal Stewart Jr |
| Autore | Stewart C. Neal |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (226 p.) |
| Disciplina | 174/.95 |
| Soggetto topico |
Research - Moral and ethical aspects
Scientists - Professional ethics |
| ISBN |
1-119-97986-2
1-283-27982-7 9786613279828 1-119-97887-4 1-119-97886-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Research Ethicsfor Scientists; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements and Dedication; Chapter 1 Research Ethics: The Best Ethical Practices Produce the Best Science; Judge yourself; Morality vs ethics; Inauspicious beginnings; How science works; Summary; Judge yourself redux; Chapter 2 How Corrupt is Science?; Judge yourself; "Scientists behaving badly"; Do scientists behave worse with experience?; Judge yourself; Crime and punishment; Judge yourself; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 3 Plagiarise and Perish; Ideas; Sentences; Phrases
A hoppy exampleWhat is plagiarism, really?; Judge yourself; How many consecutive identical and uncited words constitute plagiarism?; Self-plagiarism and recycling; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Tools to discover plagiarism; Self-plagiarism and ethics revisited; Judge yourself; Is plagiarism getting worse?; The case of the plagiarising graduate student; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 4 Finding the Perfect Mentor; Caveat; Choosing a mentor; Judge yourself; Choosing a graduate project; Judge yourself; Mentors for assistant professors How to train your mentorChoosing the right research project: the new graduate student's dilemma; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 5 Becoming the Perfect Mentor; Grants and contracts are a prerequisite to productive science; Judge yourself; Publications are the fruit of research; On a personal level; Judge yourself; Common and predictable mistakes scientist make at key stages in their training and careers and how being a good mentor can make improvements; Questions; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 6 Research Misconduct: Fabricating Data Why cheat?Judge yourself; The case of Jan Hendrick Sch ̈on, "Plastic Fantastic"; The case of Woo-Suk Hwang: dog cloner, data fabricator; Judge yourself; Detection of image and data misrepresentation; Judge yourself; Neither here nor there - the curious case of Homme Hellinga; Judge yourself; Lessons learnt; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 7 Research Misconduct: Falsification and Whistleblowing; A "can of worms" indeed: the case of Elizabeth "Betsy" Goodwin; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Judge yourself; Judge yourself Deal with ethical quandaries informally if possibleJudge yourself; Cultivating a culture of openness, integrity, and accountability; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Judge yourself redux; Summary; Chapter 8 Authorship: Who's an Author on a Scientific Paper and Why; The importance of the scientific publication; Judge yourself; Who should be listed as an author on a scientific paper?; Judge yourself; How to avoid author quandaries; Authorship for works other than research papers The difference between authorship on scientific papers and inventorship on patents |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910817010003321 |
|
Stewart C. Neal
|
||
| Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||