Argumentation : analysis and evaluation / / Frans H. van Eemeren, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans |
Autore | Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946-, > |
Edizione | [Second edition.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York ; ; London : , : Routledge, , 2017 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (178 pages) |
Disciplina | 168 |
Altri autori (Persone) | Snoeck HenkemansArnolda Francisca |
Soggetto topico |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Discourse analysis |
ISBN |
1-138-22507-X
9781315401133 1-315-40114-2 1-315-40112-6 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | Preface -- Standpoints and differences of opinion -- Argumentation and discussion -- The presentation of argumentation -- Unexpressed standpoints and unexpressed premises -- The argumentation structure -- The soundness of argumentation -- Fallacies as violations of discussion rules 1-5 -- Fallacies as violations of discussion rules 6-10 -- Strategic maneuvering -- The conventionalization of communicative activity types. |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910150336103321 |
Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946-, > | ||
New York ; ; London : , : Routledge, , 2017 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910465060003321 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910786610603321 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Argumentation and health / / edited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (153 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.1/4 |
Collana | Benjamins Current Topics |
Soggetto topico |
Communication in medicine
Medical personnel Communication in human services Interprofessional relations Debates and debating |
ISBN | 90-272-6984-X |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making
2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910812940203321 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory / / by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, Jean H. M. Wagemans |
Autore | Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946-> |
Edizione | [1st ed. 2014.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Dordrecht : , : Springer Netherlands : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2014 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (XII, 988 p. 79 illus., 18 illus. in color. eReference.) |
Disciplina | 808 |
Soggetto topico |
Philosophy
Linguistics Social sciences Law Logic Society |
ISBN | 90-481-9473-3 |
Classificazione | 08.33 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | Preface -- Acknowledgement -- 1. Argumentation theory -- 2. Classical backgrounds -- 4. Toulmin’s model of argumentation -- 5. The new rhetoric -- 6. Formal dialectical approaches -- 7. Informal logic -- 8. Communication studies and rhetoric -- 9. Linguistic approaches -- 10. The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation -- 11. Argumentation and artificial intelligence -- 12. Research in related disciplines and non-Anglophone areas -- Classified bibliography -- Alphabetical bibliography -- Name Index -- Subject Index. |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910483986103321 |
Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946-> | ||
Dordrecht : , : Springer Netherlands : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2014 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics [[electronic resource] ] : in honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren / / edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (290 p.) |
Disciplina | 401/.45 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
EemerenF. H. van <1946-> (Frans Hendrik)
FeterisE. T GarssenBart Snoeck HenkemansArnolda Francisca |
Soggetto topico |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Discourse analysis |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
1-283-12204-9
9786613122049 90-272-8703-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Maneuvering strategically with dissociation in a political interview; Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation; Figurative analogy in political argumentation; Anecdotes and arguments; Pragma-dialectical analysis of rhetorical texts; Amplification in strategic maneuvering; Breast cancer screening; A doctor's ethos enhancing maneuvers in medical consultation; "Try the smarter way"; Argument analysis in large scale deliberation
The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemesThe analysis of the strategic function of presentational techniques; Handling counterarguments; On Combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis; Formal dialectical systems and their uses in the study of argumentation; The pragma-dialectical approach to circularity in argumentation; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910461749903321 |
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics [[electronic resource] ] : in honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren / / edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (290 p.) |
Disciplina | 401/.45 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
EemerenF. H. van <1946-> (Frans Hendrik)
FeterisE. T GarssenBart Snoeck HenkemansArnolda Francisca |
Soggetto topico |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Discourse analysis |
ISBN |
1-283-12204-9
9786613122049 90-272-8703-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Maneuvering strategically with dissociation in a political interview; Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation; Figurative analogy in political argumentation; Anecdotes and arguments; Pragma-dialectical analysis of rhetorical texts; Amplification in strategic maneuvering; Breast cancer screening; A doctor's ethos enhancing maneuvers in medical consultation; "Try the smarter way"; Argument analysis in large scale deliberation
The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemesThe analysis of the strategic function of presentational techniques; Handling counterarguments; On Combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis; Formal dialectical systems and their uses in the study of argumentation; The pragma-dialectical approach to circularity in argumentation; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910790075503321 |
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics [[electronic resource] ] : in honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren / / edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (290 p.) |
Disciplina | 401/.45 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
EemerenF. H. van <1946-> (Frans Hendrik)
FeterisE. T GarssenBart Snoeck HenkemansArnolda Francisca |
Soggetto topico |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Discourse analysis |
ISBN |
1-283-12204-9
9786613122049 90-272-8703-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Maneuvering strategically with dissociation in a political interview; Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation; Figurative analogy in political argumentation; Anecdotes and arguments; Pragma-dialectical analysis of rhetorical texts; Amplification in strategic maneuvering; Breast cancer screening; A doctor's ethos enhancing maneuvers in medical consultation; "Try the smarter way"; Argument analysis in large scale deliberation
The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemesThe analysis of the strategic function of presentational techniques; Handling counterarguments; On Combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis; Formal dialectical systems and their uses in the study of argumentation; The pragma-dialectical approach to circularity in argumentation; Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910811833703321 |
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011 | ||
Materiale a stampa | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|