Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Flexibility and robustness in scheduling [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville
| Flexibility and robustness in scheduling [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (351 p.) |
| Disciplina |
658.5/3
658.53 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BillautJean-Charles <1967->
MoukrimAziz SanlavilleEric |
| Collana | Control systems, robotics and manufacturing series |
| Soggetto topico | Production scheduling |
| ISBN |
1-118-62339-8
1-282-16522-4 9786612165221 0-470-61143-X 0-470-39404-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; Table of Contents; Preface; Chapter 1. Introduction to Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; 1.1. Scheduling problems; 1.1.1. Machine environments; 1.1.2. Characteristics of tasks; 1.1.3. Optimality criteria; 1.2. Background to the study; 1.3. Uncertainty management; 1.3.1. Sources of uncertainty; 1.3.2. Uncertainty of models; 1.3.3. Possible methods for problem solving; 1.3.3.1. Full solution process of a scheduling problem with uncertainties; 1.3.3.2. Proactive approach; 1.3.3.3. Proactive/reactive approach; 1.3.3.4. Reactive approach
1.4. Flexibility1.5. Robustness; 1.5.1. Flexibility as a robustness indicator; 1.5.2. Schedule stability (solution robustness); 1.5.3. Stability relatively to a performance criterion (quality robustness); 1.5.4. Respect of a fixed performance threshold; 1.5.5. Deviation measures with respect to the optimum; 1.5.6. Sensitivity and robustness; 1.6. Bibliography; Chapter 2. Robustness in Operations Research and Decision Aiding; 2.1. Overview; 2.1.1. Robust in OR-DA with meaning?; 2.1.2. Why the concern for robustness?; 2.1.3. Plan of the chapter 2.2. Where do "vague approximations" and "zones of ignorance" come from? - the concept of version2.2.1. Sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision; 2.2.2. DAP formulation: the concept of version; 2.3. Defining some currently used terms; 2.3.1. Procedures, results and methods; 2.3.2. Two types of procedures and methods; 2.3.3. Conclusions relative to a set R of results; 2.4. How to take the robustness concern into consideration; 2.4.1. What must be robust?; 2.4.2. What are the conditions for validating robustness? 2.4.3. How can we define the set of pairs of procedures and versions to take into account?2.5. Conclusion; 2.6. Bibliography; Chapter 3. The Robustness of Multi-Purpose Machines Workshop Configuration; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Problem presentation; 3.2.1. Modeling the workshop; 3.2.1.1. Production resources; 3.2.1.2. Modeling the workshop demand; 3.2.2. Modeling disturbances on the data; 3.2.3. Performance versus robustness: load balance and stability radius; 3.2.3.1. Performance criterion for a configuration; 3.2.3.2. Robustness; 3.3. Performance measurement 3.3.1. Stage one: minimizing the maximum completion time3.3.2. Computing a production plan minimizing machine workload; 3.3.3. The particular case of uniform machines; 3.4. Robustness evaluation; 3.4.1. Finding the demands for which the production plan is balanced; 3.4.2. Stability radius; 3.4.3. Graphic representation; 3.5. Extension: reconfiguration problem; 3.5.1. Consequence of adding a qualification to the matrix Q; 3.5.2. Theoretical example; 3.5.3. Industrial example; 3.6. Conclusion and perspectives; 3.7. Bibliography; Chapter 4. Sensitivity Analysis for One and m Machines 4.1. Sensitivity analysis |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910139468503321 |
| London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Flexibility and robustness in scheduling [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville
| Flexibility and robustness in scheduling [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (351 p.) |
| Disciplina |
658.5/3
658.53 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BillautJean-Charles <1967->
MoukrimAziz SanlavilleEric |
| Collana | Control systems, robotics and manufacturing series |
| Soggetto topico | Production scheduling |
| ISBN |
1-118-62339-8
1-282-16522-4 9786612165221 0-470-61143-X 0-470-39404-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; Table of Contents; Preface; Chapter 1. Introduction to Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; 1.1. Scheduling problems; 1.1.1. Machine environments; 1.1.2. Characteristics of tasks; 1.1.3. Optimality criteria; 1.2. Background to the study; 1.3. Uncertainty management; 1.3.1. Sources of uncertainty; 1.3.2. Uncertainty of models; 1.3.3. Possible methods for problem solving; 1.3.3.1. Full solution process of a scheduling problem with uncertainties; 1.3.3.2. Proactive approach; 1.3.3.3. Proactive/reactive approach; 1.3.3.4. Reactive approach
1.4. Flexibility1.5. Robustness; 1.5.1. Flexibility as a robustness indicator; 1.5.2. Schedule stability (solution robustness); 1.5.3. Stability relatively to a performance criterion (quality robustness); 1.5.4. Respect of a fixed performance threshold; 1.5.5. Deviation measures with respect to the optimum; 1.5.6. Sensitivity and robustness; 1.6. Bibliography; Chapter 2. Robustness in Operations Research and Decision Aiding; 2.1. Overview; 2.1.1. Robust in OR-DA with meaning?; 2.1.2. Why the concern for robustness?; 2.1.3. Plan of the chapter 2.2. Where do "vague approximations" and "zones of ignorance" come from? - the concept of version2.2.1. Sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision; 2.2.2. DAP formulation: the concept of version; 2.3. Defining some currently used terms; 2.3.1. Procedures, results and methods; 2.3.2. Two types of procedures and methods; 2.3.3. Conclusions relative to a set R of results; 2.4. How to take the robustness concern into consideration; 2.4.1. What must be robust?; 2.4.2. What are the conditions for validating robustness? 2.4.3. How can we define the set of pairs of procedures and versions to take into account?2.5. Conclusion; 2.6. Bibliography; Chapter 3. The Robustness of Multi-Purpose Machines Workshop Configuration; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Problem presentation; 3.2.1. Modeling the workshop; 3.2.1.1. Production resources; 3.2.1.2. Modeling the workshop demand; 3.2.2. Modeling disturbances on the data; 3.2.3. Performance versus robustness: load balance and stability radius; 3.2.3.1. Performance criterion for a configuration; 3.2.3.2. Robustness; 3.3. Performance measurement 3.3.1. Stage one: minimizing the maximum completion time3.3.2. Computing a production plan minimizing machine workload; 3.3.3. The particular case of uniform machines; 3.4. Robustness evaluation; 3.4.1. Finding the demands for which the production plan is balanced; 3.4.2. Stability radius; 3.4.3. Graphic representation; 3.5. Extension: reconfiguration problem; 3.5.1. Consequence of adding a qualification to the matrix Q; 3.5.2. Theoretical example; 3.5.3. Industrial example; 3.6. Conclusion and perspectives; 3.7. Bibliography; Chapter 4. Sensitivity Analysis for One and m Machines 4.1. Sensitivity analysis |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910829809203321 |
| London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Flexibility and robustness in scheduling / / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville
| Flexibility and robustness in scheduling / / edited by Jean-Charles Billaut, Aziz Moukrim, Eric Sanlaville |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (351 p.) |
| Disciplina | 658.5/3 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BillautJean-Charles <1967->
MoukrimAziz SanlavilleEric |
| Collana | Control systems, robotics and manufacturing series |
| Soggetto topico | Production scheduling |
| ISBN |
1-118-62339-8
1-282-16522-4 9786612165221 0-470-61143-X 0-470-39404-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; Table of Contents; Preface; Chapter 1. Introduction to Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling; 1.1. Scheduling problems; 1.1.1. Machine environments; 1.1.2. Characteristics of tasks; 1.1.3. Optimality criteria; 1.2. Background to the study; 1.3. Uncertainty management; 1.3.1. Sources of uncertainty; 1.3.2. Uncertainty of models; 1.3.3. Possible methods for problem solving; 1.3.3.1. Full solution process of a scheduling problem with uncertainties; 1.3.3.2. Proactive approach; 1.3.3.3. Proactive/reactive approach; 1.3.3.4. Reactive approach
1.4. Flexibility1.5. Robustness; 1.5.1. Flexibility as a robustness indicator; 1.5.2. Schedule stability (solution robustness); 1.5.3. Stability relatively to a performance criterion (quality robustness); 1.5.4. Respect of a fixed performance threshold; 1.5.5. Deviation measures with respect to the optimum; 1.5.6. Sensitivity and robustness; 1.6. Bibliography; Chapter 2. Robustness in Operations Research and Decision Aiding; 2.1. Overview; 2.1.1. Robust in OR-DA with meaning?; 2.1.2. Why the concern for robustness?; 2.1.3. Plan of the chapter 2.2. Where do "vague approximations" and "zones of ignorance" come from? - the concept of version2.2.1. Sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision; 2.2.2. DAP formulation: the concept of version; 2.3. Defining some currently used terms; 2.3.1. Procedures, results and methods; 2.3.2. Two types of procedures and methods; 2.3.3. Conclusions relative to a set R of results; 2.4. How to take the robustness concern into consideration; 2.4.1. What must be robust?; 2.4.2. What are the conditions for validating robustness? 2.4.3. How can we define the set of pairs of procedures and versions to take into account?2.5. Conclusion; 2.6. Bibliography; Chapter 3. The Robustness of Multi-Purpose Machines Workshop Configuration; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Problem presentation; 3.2.1. Modeling the workshop; 3.2.1.1. Production resources; 3.2.1.2. Modeling the workshop demand; 3.2.2. Modeling disturbances on the data; 3.2.3. Performance versus robustness: load balance and stability radius; 3.2.3.1. Performance criterion for a configuration; 3.2.3.2. Robustness; 3.3. Performance measurement 3.3.1. Stage one: minimizing the maximum completion time3.3.2. Computing a production plan minimizing machine workload; 3.3.3. The particular case of uniform machines; 3.4. Robustness evaluation; 3.4.1. Finding the demands for which the production plan is balanced; 3.4.2. Stability radius; 3.4.3. Graphic representation; 3.5. Extension: reconfiguration problem; 3.5.1. Consequence of adding a qualification to the matrix Q; 3.5.2. Theoretical example; 3.5.3. Industrial example; 3.6. Conclusion and perspectives; 3.7. Bibliography; Chapter 4. Sensitivity Analysis for One and m Machines 4.1. Sensitivity analysis |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910876650603321 |
| London ; ; Hoboken, NJ, : ISTE/John Wiley & Sons, 2008 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||