Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
The 1998-2000 Eritrea-Ethiopia War and its aftermath in international legal perspective : from the 2000 Algiers Agreements to the 2018 Peace Agreement / / Andrea de Guttry, Harry H.G. Post, Gabriella Venturini, editors
| The 1998-2000 Eritrea-Ethiopia War and its aftermath in international legal perspective : from the 2000 Algiers Agreements to the 2018 Peace Agreement / / Andrea de Guttry, Harry H.G. Post, Gabriella Venturini, editors |
| Edizione | [2nd ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Berlin, Germany : , : Springer |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xxix, 753 pages) |
| Disciplina | 963.5072 |
| Soggetto topico |
Eritrean-Ethiopian War, 1998-2000
Humanitarian law - Eritrea Humanitarian law - Ethiopia War (International law) |
| ISBN | 94-6265-439-5 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Intro -- Preface -- Introductory Remarks -- Contents -- About the Editors -- Abbreviations and Acronyms -- Part IThe Historical Background of the Conflict Between Eritrea and Ethiopia -- 1 The Lines of Tension in the Horn and the Ethiopia-Eritrea Case -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Centre and Periphery -- 1.3 In the Aftermath of Colonialism -- 1.4 The Narrow Road to Self-determination -- 1.5 An Inter-State War -- References -- 2 The Historical Background of the 1998-2000 War: Some Salient Points -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Vacillating Status of the Ethio-Eritrean Border/Boundary -- 2.3 Eritrea as 'Terra Irredenta' -- 2.4 Deep-Rooted Authoritarian Tradition -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Burdened by the Past and Stranded in the Present. The Weight of History in the Relations Between Eritrea and Ethiopia -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 The Troubled Nineteenth Century: The Geopolitics of Märäb Mällaš -- 3.3 Re-imagining Communities: The Impact of Colonialism -- 3.4 Experimenting with Democracy and Nationalism: The Vibrant Forties -- 3.5 Rivalry, Nationalisms and Spread Conflict: The Federal Period -- 3.6 Rival Nationalisms, Radicalism and Protracted Warfare: The Liberation Struggle -- 3.7 Conclusions -- References -- Part IIThe International Legal Framework for the Settlement of the Dispute -- 4 The 2000 Algiers Agreements -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Early Diplomatic Efforts and the OAU Framework Agreement, the Modalities for Its Implementation and the Technical Arrangements (November 1998-August 1999) -- 4.3 The Agreement on Cessation of Hostilities (18 June 2000) -- 4.4 The Agreement of 12 December 2000 Between the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Government of the State of Eritrea: An Attempt for a Comprehensive Solution -- 4.5 The Boundary Commission and the Reaction to Its Decision on Delimitation.
4.6 The Claims Commission Compared to Other Similar Bodies -- 4.7 Concluding Remarks: Intrinsic Limits of the December 2000 Algiers Agreement and Its Failure to End the Conflict -- References -- 5 The Involvement of the UN in the Management of the 1998-2000 Crisis and the Role of the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) -- 5.1 The Different Roles Played by the UN During the Fighting Between Ethiopia and Eritrea: The Political Phase -- 5.1.1 The Sanctions Adopted against the Two Countries -- 5.1.2 The Humanitarian Action -- 5.2 The Signing of the 18 June 2000 Agreement on Cessation of Hostilities and the Request for the Deployment of a UN Peacekeeping Operation -- 5.3 The Establishment of the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) -- 5.4 UNMEE Original Mandate and Its Evolution -- 5.5 UNMEE in Action: The Activities Carried Out and the Problems Faced in Implementing Its Mandate -- 5.6 The Decision to Terminate the Mission: UN Security Council Resolution 1827 (2008) -- 5.7 Concluding Remarks -- References -- 6 Some Remarks on the Nature and Practice of UNMEE -- 6.1 The Character and Nature of UNMEE -- 6.2 UN Cooperation with Regional Organisations, Especially in Africa -- 6.3 UNMEE in Practice -- 6.4 Some Conclusions -- 6.5 Some Remarks on the Aftermath -- References -- Part III The Boundary Dispute -- 7 The Ethio-Eritrean Boundary Conflict: The Human Border, the Physical Border, and the Scars of History -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Borders in the Ethiopian Empire -- 7.3 From Mareb Mellash to the Colony of Eritrea -- 7.4 The Colonial Border in Dispute -- 7.5 Defining the Border -- 7.6 Delimiting an Unstable Frontier: The Contested Areas -- 7.7 A Failed Demarcation -- 7.8 The Changing Status of the Border -- 7.9 The Borderlands at War -- 7.10 Map-Making Ambiguities Resurfaced -- 7.11 From the Border Dispute to the 'Bridge of Love'?. References -- 8 Law and Politics in the Ethiopian-Eritrean Border Dispute, 2002-2019 -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 History, Context and Law -- 8.3 The Nature of the 2002 EEBC Decision in Socio-historical Context -- 8.3.1 The Mandate -- 8.3.2 The Use of Evidence -- 8.3.3 The Reference to 'Applicable International Law' -- 8.3.4 The Interpretation of Evidence -- 8.3.5 A Possible Contradiction with the Findings of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission? -- 8.4 Conclusion: International Law and Political Constraint -- References -- 9 Indigenous Statehood and International Law in Ethiopia and Eritrea -- 9.1 Introduction: The Ambivalent Legacy of International Law -- 9.2 Law, Land and the International Politics of Territoriality -- 9.3 Indigenous and International Concepts of Law -- 9.4 Conclusions -- References -- 10 The Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission: A Legal Analysis of the Boundary Delimitation Decision of 13 April 2002 and Relevant Subsequent Decisions -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Brief Historical Perspective -- 10.3 The Agreement of 12 December 2000 -- 10.4 The Boundary Commission's Proceedings and Decision of 13 April 2002 -- 10.5 Preliminary Legal Issues -- 10.5.1 The Essential Nature of the Delimitation Decision -- 10.5.2 Structural Issues -- 10.5.3 The Task of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission -- 10.6 Essential Doctrinal Issues Arising from the Decision of 13 April 2002 -- 10.6.1 Subsequent Conduct or Practice -- 10.6.2 Map Evidence -- 10.6.3 Interpretation of Treaties and Awards -- 10.7 Legal Issues Arising from Specific Findings in the Decision of 13 April 2002 -- 10.7.1 Boundary Lines in Rivers: The Main Navigable Channel -- 10.7.2 The Western Terminus -- 10.7.3 State Activity and Subsequent Conduct: Application -- 10.7.4 Sectors Requiring Further Delimitation -- 10.8 Select Subsequent Decisions and Developments. 10.8.1 The Question of Interpretation and Correction of Errors: The Decision of 24 June 2002 -- 10.8.2 The Question of Finality of Certain Sectors: The Decision of 7 November 2002 -- 10.8.3 The Question of Constructive Demarcation: The Decision of 27 November 2006 -- 10.9 Concluding Remarks -- References -- 11 The Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission: The Aftermath -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 The Final Stages of the EEBC -- 11.3 Non-cooperation Between the Parties and the EEBC -- 11.4 Badme Area -- 11.5 International Context -- 11.6 EECC: Jus ad Bellum, Border and Consistency of Decisions -- 11.7 Further Considerations on the Algiers Agreement and the EEBC Decision -- 11.8 Conclusions -- References -- Part IVThe Eritrea-Ethiopia Dispute and the Use of Force -- 12 International Law as to the Use of Force -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2 A Brief History of the Prohibition Against the Use of Force by States -- 12.3 The Commission's Jurisdiction Over Claims Relating to the Use of Force -- 12.4 Eritrea's Violation of the Prohibition Against the Use of Force -- 12.5 Eritrea's First Defence: Ethiopia Was Unlawfully Occupying Eritrean Territory -- 12.6 Eritrea's Second Defence: Eritrea Acted in Self-defence -- 12.7 Eritrea's Third Defence: Ethiopia 'Declared War' on Eritrea -- 12.8 Alleged Unlawfulness of Eritrea's Subsequent Attacks in May and June 1998 -- 12.9 Conclusion -- References -- 13 The Crime of Aggression and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Armed Conflict -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 The Legal Concept of Aggression -- 13.3 The Legal Definition of Aggression -- 13.3.1 General Aspects -- 13.3.2 The Eritrea-Ethiopia Armed Conflict -- 13.4 Silencing Aggression and Issues of Responsibility -- 13.4.1 General Aspects -- 13.4.2 The Eritrea-Ethiopia Armed Conflict -- 13.5 Conclusion -- References. 14 The Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission's Controversial Ruling on Self-defence -- 14.1 The EECC's Jurisdiction Over the Jus ad Bellum Claims -- 14.2 Eritrea's Unsuccessful Defences Other than Self-defence -- 14.3 The Right of Self-defence Under the UN Charter and Customary International Law: An Overview -- 14.4 The EECC's Ruling on Self-defence and Armed Attack -- 14.5 The Debatable Exclusion of Small-Scale Cross-Border Attacks from the Ratione Materiae Content of Armed Attack -- 14.6 Eritrea's Resort to Armed Force in the Light of the So-Called 'Accumulation of Events Theory' -- 14.7 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Part VThe Eritrea-Ethiopia War and the Law of Armed Conflict -- 15 International Humanitarian Law and the Conduct of Hostilities in the Case-Law of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission -- 15.1 Introduction -- 15.2 The Nature and Temporal Extent of the Conflict Between Eritrea and Ethiopia -- 15.2.1 An International Armed Conflict -- 15.2.2 Temporal Extent of the Conflict -- 15.3 The Applicable International Humanitarian Law -- 15.3.1 Basic Instruments -- 15.3.2 Treaties Binding on the Parties to the Conflict -- 15.3.3 Treaty Law and International Customary Law -- 15.4 The International Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law -- 15.4.1 Basic Principles -- 15.4.2 Attribution -- 15.4.3 Content -- 15.5 The EECC's Approaches and Findings -- 15.5.1 Liability for Serious Violations -- 15.5.2 Means of Warfare -- 15.5.3 Methods of Warfare -- 15.6 Concluding Remarks -- References -- 16 The Treatment of Protected Persons Under the Applicable International Law in the Findings of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission -- 16.1 Introduction -- 16.2 Law Applicable to the Treatment of Protected Persons -- 16.3 Jurisdiction Over Events Subsequent to the War -- 16.4 Jurisdiction Over Claims Not Filed by 12 December 2001. 16.5 Evidentiary Issues: The Burden of Proof and the Standard Applied by the EECC. |
| Altri titoli varianti | One thousand nine hundred ninety-eight to two thousand Eritrea-Ethiopia War and its aftermath in international legal perspective |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910483613703321 |
| Berlin, Germany : , : Springer | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.)
| Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.) |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (206 p.) |
| Disciplina | 363.728 |
| Soggetto topico | Refuse and refuse disposal |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 94-6094-967-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
COVER; TABLE OF CONTENTS; PREFACE; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTORY REMARKS; PART I: INTRODUCTION; 1 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EU LEGISLATION: AN INTRODUCTION; 1.1 BASIC PRINCIPLES, TERMS AND DEFINITIONS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT; 1.2 SPECIFIC LEGISLATION; 1.3 TRANSPORT OF WASTE; 1.4 SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS: SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH; 2 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE ECHR: AN INTRODUCTION; 2.1 PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS; 2.2 STATES OBLIGATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES UNDER ECHR LAW; PART II: JURISPRUDENCE
3 THE 'WASTE CRISIS' IN CAMPANIA BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME REMARKS ON THE CASE DI SARNO AND OTHERS V. ITALY3.1 INTRODUCTION; 3.2 THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE; 3.3 THE WAY THE COURT REJECTED THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S 'VICTIM' STATUS AND SOME ANOMALIES OF THE CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION 3.4 THE WAY THE COURT APPLIED IN THE PRESENT CASE THE CRITERION 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW' PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION AND HELD THAT THE STATE VIOLATED THE APPLICANTS' RIGHTS TO RESPECT FOR THEIR PRIVATE LIVES AND THEIR HOMES3.5 THE DISMISSAL OF THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION BASED ON APPLICANTS' FAILURE TO EXHAUST DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE FINDING THAT THE STATE VIOLATED ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION; 3.6 CONCLUSIONS; 4 EU CASE-LAW AND WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA; 4.1 THE PROBLEM OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA 4.2 RELEVANT EU LEGISLATION ON WASTE MANAGEMENT4.3 BREACHES OF EU WASTE LAW (GENERAL); 4.4 INFRINGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER EU LAW; 4.5 CASE-LAW RELEVANT FOR THE PROBLEMS IN CAMPANIA; 4.6 NEXT STEPS; PART III: ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION; 5 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU WASTE LAW: JUST AS DIFFICULT AS ENFORCEMENT OF EU LAW IN OTHER DOMAINS?; 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL JUDGES; 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE COMMISSION; 5.3 AND WHAT ABOUT EU WASTE LAW?; 6 THE LEGAL PARADOX OF EU WASTE MANAGEMENT; 6.1 A PARTIAL EU WASTE POLICY 6.2 MAIN REASONS OF THE PROBLEMS FACED BY THE EU WASTE LAW7 OPPORTUNITIES AND PITFALLS FOR SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT IN EU WASTE LAW; 7.1 THE FIRST ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DEFINITION OF WASTE; 7.2 THE SECOND ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DELINEATION WITH REACH; 7.3 A HERD OF ELEPHANTS: THE APPLICATION OF THE WASTE SHIPMENTS REGULATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TREATY ARTICLES ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS. SIMILAR DISCUSSIONS AT THE LEVEL OF THE WTO; 7.4 OWNERSHIP OF WASTE; 7.5 USE RESTRICTIONS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT; ANNEXES; DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL WHEREAS: |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910464899503321 |
| Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.)
| Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.) |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (206 p.) |
| Disciplina | 363.728 |
| Soggetto topico | Refuse and refuse disposal |
| ISBN | 94-6094-967-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
COVER; TABLE OF CONTENTS; PREFACE; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTORY REMARKS; PART I: INTRODUCTION; 1 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EU LEGISLATION: AN INTRODUCTION; 1.1 BASIC PRINCIPLES, TERMS AND DEFINITIONS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT; 1.2 SPECIFIC LEGISLATION; 1.3 TRANSPORT OF WASTE; 1.4 SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS: SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH; 2 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE ECHR: AN INTRODUCTION; 2.1 PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS; 2.2 STATES OBLIGATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES UNDER ECHR LAW; PART II: JURISPRUDENCE
3 THE 'WASTE CRISIS' IN CAMPANIA BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME REMARKS ON THE CASE DI SARNO AND OTHERS V. ITALY3.1 INTRODUCTION; 3.2 THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE; 3.3 THE WAY THE COURT REJECTED THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S 'VICTIM' STATUS AND SOME ANOMALIES OF THE CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION 3.4 THE WAY THE COURT APPLIED IN THE PRESENT CASE THE CRITERION 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW' PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION AND HELD THAT THE STATE VIOLATED THE APPLICANTS' RIGHTS TO RESPECT FOR THEIR PRIVATE LIVES AND THEIR HOMES3.5 THE DISMISSAL OF THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION BASED ON APPLICANTS' FAILURE TO EXHAUST DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE FINDING THAT THE STATE VIOLATED ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION; 3.6 CONCLUSIONS; 4 EU CASE-LAW AND WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA; 4.1 THE PROBLEM OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA 4.2 RELEVANT EU LEGISLATION ON WASTE MANAGEMENT4.3 BREACHES OF EU WASTE LAW (GENERAL); 4.4 INFRINGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER EU LAW; 4.5 CASE-LAW RELEVANT FOR THE PROBLEMS IN CAMPANIA; 4.6 NEXT STEPS; PART III: ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION; 5 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU WASTE LAW: JUST AS DIFFICULT AS ENFORCEMENT OF EU LAW IN OTHER DOMAINS?; 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL JUDGES; 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE COMMISSION; 5.3 AND WHAT ABOUT EU WASTE LAW?; 6 THE LEGAL PARADOX OF EU WASTE MANAGEMENT; 6.1 A PARTIAL EU WASTE POLICY 6.2 MAIN REASONS OF THE PROBLEMS FACED BY THE EU WASTE LAW7 OPPORTUNITIES AND PITFALLS FOR SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT IN EU WASTE LAW; 7.1 THE FIRST ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DEFINITION OF WASTE; 7.2 THE SECOND ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DELINEATION WITH REACH; 7.3 A HERD OF ELEPHANTS: THE APPLICATION OF THE WASTE SHIPMENTS REGULATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TREATY ARTICLES ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS. SIMILAR DISCUSSIONS AT THE LEVEL OF THE WTO; 7.4 OWNERSHIP OF WASTE; 7.5 USE RESTRICTIONS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT; ANNEXES; DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL WHEREAS: |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910786542203321 |
| Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.)
| Waste management in European law : the example of Napels and Campania / / Ioannis K. Panoussis and Harry H.G. Post (eds.) |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (206 p.) |
| Disciplina | 363.728 |
| Soggetto topico | Refuse and refuse disposal |
| ISBN | 94-6094-967-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
COVER; TABLE OF CONTENTS; PREFACE; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTORY REMARKS; PART I: INTRODUCTION; 1 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EU LEGISLATION: AN INTRODUCTION; 1.1 BASIC PRINCIPLES, TERMS AND DEFINITIONS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT; 1.2 SPECIFIC LEGISLATION; 1.3 TRANSPORT OF WASTE; 1.4 SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS: SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH; 2 WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE ECHR: AN INTRODUCTION; 2.1 PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS; 2.2 STATES OBLIGATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES UNDER ECHR LAW; PART II: JURISPRUDENCE
3 THE 'WASTE CRISIS' IN CAMPANIA BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME REMARKS ON THE CASE DI SARNO AND OTHERS V. ITALY3.1 INTRODUCTION; 3.2 THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE; 3.3 THE WAY THE COURT REJECTED THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S 'VICTIM' STATUS AND SOME ANOMALIES OF THE CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION 3.4 THE WAY THE COURT APPLIED IN THE PRESENT CASE THE CRITERION 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW' PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION AND HELD THAT THE STATE VIOLATED THE APPLICANTS' RIGHTS TO RESPECT FOR THEIR PRIVATE LIVES AND THEIR HOMES3.5 THE DISMISSAL OF THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION BASED ON APPLICANTS' FAILURE TO EXHAUST DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE FINDING THAT THE STATE VIOLATED ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION; 3.6 CONCLUSIONS; 4 EU CASE-LAW AND WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA; 4.1 THE PROBLEM OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CAMPANIA 4.2 RELEVANT EU LEGISLATION ON WASTE MANAGEMENT4.3 BREACHES OF EU WASTE LAW (GENERAL); 4.4 INFRINGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER EU LAW; 4.5 CASE-LAW RELEVANT FOR THE PROBLEMS IN CAMPANIA; 4.6 NEXT STEPS; PART III: ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION; 5 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU WASTE LAW: JUST AS DIFFICULT AS ENFORCEMENT OF EU LAW IN OTHER DOMAINS?; 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL JUDGES; 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LAW AND THE COMMISSION; 5.3 AND WHAT ABOUT EU WASTE LAW?; 6 THE LEGAL PARADOX OF EU WASTE MANAGEMENT; 6.1 A PARTIAL EU WASTE POLICY 6.2 MAIN REASONS OF THE PROBLEMS FACED BY THE EU WASTE LAW7 OPPORTUNITIES AND PITFALLS FOR SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT IN EU WASTE LAW; 7.1 THE FIRST ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DEFINITION OF WASTE; 7.2 THE SECOND ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: DELINEATION WITH REACH; 7.3 A HERD OF ELEPHANTS: THE APPLICATION OF THE WASTE SHIPMENTS REGULATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TREATY ARTICLES ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS. SIMILAR DISCUSSIONS AT THE LEVEL OF THE WTO; 7.4 OWNERSHIP OF WASTE; 7.5 USE RESTRICTIONS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT; ANNEXES; DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL WHEREAS: |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910816976603321 |
| Hague, Netherlands : , : Eleven International Publishing, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||