Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / edited by Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley [[electronic resource]]
| Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / edited by Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley [[electronic resource]] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xii, 304 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
| Disciplina | 174.297 |
| Soggetto topico |
Surgeons - Rating of
Surgeons - Professional ethics Informed consent (Medical law) |
| ISBN |
1-107-17857-6
1-281-08615-0 9786611086152 1-139-13210-5 0-511-35098-8 0-511-34922-X 0-511-34825-8 0-511-54546-0 0-511-35008-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Reference; Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information; Ethical arguments for reporting clinician performance information; Historical background to surgical outcomes reporting; Modern developments; Further issues in reporting surgeon performance information; Notes; References; Part I Accountability; Part introduction; 1 Clinician report cards and the limits of evidence-based patient choice; 2 Report cards for institutions, not individuals
3 Safety, accountability, and 'choice' after the Bristol Inquiry4 Public reports: putting patients in the picture requires a new relationship between doctors and patients; 5 Adverse event disclosure: benefits and drawbacks for patients and clinicians; 6 Report cards and performance monitoring; Part II Informed consent; Part introduction; 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance; 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent; 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards; 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge 11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces; Part III Reporting performance information; Part introduction; 13 Is the reporting of an individual surgeon's clinical performance doing more harm than good for patient care?; 14 Examining the link between publicly reporting healthcare quality and quality improvement; 15 Hospital and clinician performance data: what it can and cannot tell us; 16 An ethical analysis of the defensive surgery objection to individual surgeon report cards 17 Surgeon report cards and the concept of defensive medicine18 Training, innovation and surgeons' report cards; 19 Doctors' report cards: a legal perspective; Index |
| Altri titoli varianti | Informed Consent & Clinician Accountability |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910451712203321 |
| Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / editors, Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley
| Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / editors, Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xii, 304 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
| Disciplina | 174.297 |
| Soggetto topico |
Surgeons - Rating of
Surgeons - Professional ethics Informed consent (Medical law) |
| ISBN |
1-107-17857-6
1-281-08615-0 9786611086152 1-139-13210-5 0-511-35098-8 0-511-34922-X 0-511-34825-8 0-511-54546-0 0-511-35008-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Reference; Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information; Ethical arguments for reporting clinician performance information; Historical background to surgical outcomes reporting; Modern developments; Further issues in reporting surgeon performance information; Notes; References; Part I Accountability; Part introduction; 1 Clinician report cards and the limits of evidence-based patient choice; 2 Report cards for institutions, not individuals
3 Safety, accountability, and 'choice' after the Bristol Inquiry 4 Public reports: putting patients in the picture requires a new relationship between doctors and patients; 5 Adverse event disclosure: benefits and drawbacks for patients and clinicians; 6 Report cards and performance monitoring; Part II Informed consent; Part introduction; 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance; 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent; 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards; 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge 11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent 12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces; Part III Reporting performance information; Part introduction; 13 Is the reporting of an individual surgeon's clinical performance doing more harm than good for patient care?; 14 Examining the link between publicly reporting healthcare quality and quality improvement; 15 Hospital and clinician performance data: what it can and cannot tell us; 16 An ethical analysis of the defensive surgery objection to individual surgeon report cards 17 Surgeon report cards and the concept of defensive medicine18 Training, innovation and surgeons' report cards; 19 Doctors' report cards: a legal perspective; Index |
| Altri titoli varianti | Informed Consent & Clinician Accountability |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910778112903321 |
| Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / edited by Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley
| Informed consent and clinician accountability : the ethics of report cards on surgeon performance / / edited by Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cambridge, : Cambridge University Press, 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xii, 304 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
| Disciplina | 174.297 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
ClarkeSteve <1964->
OakleyJustin <1960-> |
| Soggetto topico |
Surgeons - Rating of
Surgeons - Professional ethics Informed consent (Medical law) |
| ISBN |
1-107-17857-6
1-281-08615-0 9786611086152 1-139-13210-5 0-511-35098-8 0-511-34922-X 0-511-34825-8 0-511-54546-0 0-511-35008-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Reference; Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information; Ethical arguments for reporting clinician performance information; Historical background to surgical outcomes reporting; Modern developments; Further issues in reporting surgeon performance information; Notes; References; Part I Accountability; Part introduction; 1 Clinician report cards and the limits of evidence-based patient choice; 2 Report cards for institutions, not individuals
3 Safety, accountability, and 'choice' after the Bristol Inquiry 4 Public reports: putting patients in the picture requires a new relationship between doctors and patients; 5 Adverse event disclosure: benefits and drawbacks for patients and clinicians; 6 Report cards and performance monitoring; Part II Informed consent; Part introduction; 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance; 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent; 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards; 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge 11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent 12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces; Part III Reporting performance information; Part introduction; 13 Is the reporting of an individual surgeon's clinical performance doing more harm than good for patient care?; 14 Examining the link between publicly reporting healthcare quality and quality improvement; 15 Hospital and clinician performance data: what it can and cannot tell us; 16 An ethical analysis of the defensive surgery objection to individual surgeon report cards 17 Surgeon report cards and the concept of defensive medicine18 Training, innovation and surgeons' report cards; 19 Doctors' report cards: a legal perspective; Index |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910808827403321 |
| Cambridge, : Cambridge University Press, 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||