Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May
| Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May |
| Autore | Newton Michael A. <1962-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (354 p.) |
| Disciplina | 341.01 |
| Soggetto topico | Proportionality in law |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
0-19-935505-3
0-19-935504-5 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Proportionality in International Law; Copyright; Contents; 1 Introduction; I. A Preliminary Understanding of Jus in Bello Proportionality; II. An Example of Friendly Fire between the United States and Pakistan; III. Some Preliminary Directions; 2 What is Proportionality?; I. What is Proportionality at its Most Basic?; II. Comparability and Context; III. Proportionality at the International Criminal Court and Protocol I; IV. Some Additional Examples; V. Proportionality's Paradox: Fixed Standards Assessments Reached Subjectively; 3 Proportionality: A Multiplicity of Meanings
I. The Limits of Lawful GovernanceII. The Limits of Lawful State Punishment; III. The Regulation of Investor-State Interests; IV. Maritime Delimitation; V. The Law of Countermeasures in Trade; VI. State-Imposed Restraints on Human Rights; 4 Proportionality in the Just War Tradition; I. Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality; II. Jus in Bello Proportionality; III. Jus Post Bellum Proportionality; IV. The Three Just War Proportionality Principles; V. Significance for International Law; 5 Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law; I. Framing the Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum Legal Debates II. The Origins of Jus in Bello ProportionalityIII. Proportionality and Professionalization; IV. The Emergence of Proportionality in Treaty Law; V. The Lieber Code and Additional Protocol I; VI. The International Criminal Court Framing of the Crime of Disproportionate Attacks; 6 Proportionality in Human Rights Law and Morality; I. Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law; II. Worries about Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict; III. Just War Theory and Human Rights; IV. Lex Specialis and Forfeitures; V. Necessity's Relation to Proportionality; VI. The Crime of Disproportionate Attack 7 The Uniqueness of Jus in Bello ProportionalityI. Suitability, Necessity, and Proportionality; II. Commonalities among Different Uses of Proportionality; A. The Pervasive Use of Negative Phraseology; B. Breadth of Permissible Discretion; C. What Proportionality is Not26; III. What is the Positive Role of Proportionality?; A. The Articulation of Cardinal Values; B. The Preservation of Space for Second Opinions Reevaluating Discretionary Acts; C. The Establishment of a Framework for Interrelation; IV. Why Jus in Bello Proportionality is Unique; A. The Context of Armed Conflict B. The Attribution of ActsC. The Permissive Nature of the Jus in Bello Regime; 8 Countermeasures and Counterinsurgency; I. Proportionate Countermeasures; II. Examples of Difficult Counterinsurgency Cases; 9 Human Shields and Risk; I. Forced Choices; II. International Law and Human Shields; III. Voluntary Human Shields; IV. Involuntary Human Shields; V. Risk and Concern about Civilians; VI. Adjusting the Rules of War so as Not to Favor Oppressors; 10 Targeted Killings and Proportionality in Law: Two Models; I. The Drone Strikes Controversy II. Status and Conduct: International Humanitarian Law and Domestic Law Enforcement |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910463463703321 |
Newton Michael A. <1962->
|
||
| New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May
| Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May |
| Autore | Newton Michael A. <1962-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (354 p.) |
| Disciplina | 341.01 |
| Soggetto topico | Proportionality in law |
| ISBN |
0-19-935505-3
0-19-935504-5 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Proportionality in International Law; Copyright; Contents; 1 Introduction; I. A Preliminary Understanding of Jus in Bello Proportionality; II. An Example of Friendly Fire between the United States and Pakistan; III. Some Preliminary Directions; 2 What is Proportionality?; I. What is Proportionality at its Most Basic?; II. Comparability and Context; III. Proportionality at the International Criminal Court and Protocol I; IV. Some Additional Examples; V. Proportionality's Paradox: Fixed Standards Assessments Reached Subjectively; 3 Proportionality: A Multiplicity of Meanings
I. The Limits of Lawful GovernanceII. The Limits of Lawful State Punishment; III. The Regulation of Investor-State Interests; IV. Maritime Delimitation; V. The Law of Countermeasures in Trade; VI. State-Imposed Restraints on Human Rights; 4 Proportionality in the Just War Tradition; I. Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality; II. Jus in Bello Proportionality; III. Jus Post Bellum Proportionality; IV. The Three Just War Proportionality Principles; V. Significance for International Law; 5 Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law; I. Framing the Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum Legal Debates II. The Origins of Jus in Bello ProportionalityIII. Proportionality and Professionalization; IV. The Emergence of Proportionality in Treaty Law; V. The Lieber Code and Additional Protocol I; VI. The International Criminal Court Framing of the Crime of Disproportionate Attacks; 6 Proportionality in Human Rights Law and Morality; I. Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law; II. Worries about Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict; III. Just War Theory and Human Rights; IV. Lex Specialis and Forfeitures; V. Necessity's Relation to Proportionality; VI. The Crime of Disproportionate Attack 7 The Uniqueness of Jus in Bello ProportionalityI. Suitability, Necessity, and Proportionality; II. Commonalities among Different Uses of Proportionality; A. The Pervasive Use of Negative Phraseology; B. Breadth of Permissible Discretion; C. What Proportionality is Not26; III. What is the Positive Role of Proportionality?; A. The Articulation of Cardinal Values; B. The Preservation of Space for Second Opinions Reevaluating Discretionary Acts; C. The Establishment of a Framework for Interrelation; IV. Why Jus in Bello Proportionality is Unique; A. The Context of Armed Conflict B. The Attribution of ActsC. The Permissive Nature of the Jus in Bello Regime; 8 Countermeasures and Counterinsurgency; I. Proportionate Countermeasures; II. Examples of Difficult Counterinsurgency Cases; 9 Human Shields and Risk; I. Forced Choices; II. International Law and Human Shields; III. Voluntary Human Shields; IV. Involuntary Human Shields; V. Risk and Concern about Civilians; VI. Adjusting the Rules of War so as Not to Favor Oppressors; 10 Targeted Killings and Proportionality in Law: Two Models; I. The Drone Strikes Controversy II. Status and Conduct: International Humanitarian Law and Domestic Law Enforcement |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910787996503321 |
|
Newton Michael A. <1962->
|
||
| New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May
| Proportionality in international law / / Michael Newton, Larry May |
| Autore | Newton Michael A. <1962-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (354 p.) |
| Disciplina | 341.01 |
| Soggetto topico | Proportionality in law |
| ISBN |
0-19-935505-3
0-19-935504-5 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Proportionality in International Law; Copyright; Contents; 1 Introduction; I. A Preliminary Understanding of Jus in Bello Proportionality; II. An Example of Friendly Fire between the United States and Pakistan; III. Some Preliminary Directions; 2 What is Proportionality?; I. What is Proportionality at its Most Basic?; II. Comparability and Context; III. Proportionality at the International Criminal Court and Protocol I; IV. Some Additional Examples; V. Proportionality's Paradox: Fixed Standards Assessments Reached Subjectively; 3 Proportionality: A Multiplicity of Meanings
I. The Limits of Lawful GovernanceII. The Limits of Lawful State Punishment; III. The Regulation of Investor-State Interests; IV. Maritime Delimitation; V. The Law of Countermeasures in Trade; VI. State-Imposed Restraints on Human Rights; 4 Proportionality in the Just War Tradition; I. Jus Ad Bellum Proportionality; II. Jus in Bello Proportionality; III. Jus Post Bellum Proportionality; IV. The Three Just War Proportionality Principles; V. Significance for International Law; 5 Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law; I. Framing the Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum Legal Debates II. The Origins of Jus in Bello ProportionalityIII. Proportionality and Professionalization; IV. The Emergence of Proportionality in Treaty Law; V. The Lieber Code and Additional Protocol I; VI. The International Criminal Court Framing of the Crime of Disproportionate Attacks; 6 Proportionality in Human Rights Law and Morality; I. Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law; II. Worries about Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict; III. Just War Theory and Human Rights; IV. Lex Specialis and Forfeitures; V. Necessity's Relation to Proportionality; VI. The Crime of Disproportionate Attack 7 The Uniqueness of Jus in Bello ProportionalityI. Suitability, Necessity, and Proportionality; II. Commonalities among Different Uses of Proportionality; A. The Pervasive Use of Negative Phraseology; B. Breadth of Permissible Discretion; C. What Proportionality is Not26; III. What is the Positive Role of Proportionality?; A. The Articulation of Cardinal Values; B. The Preservation of Space for Second Opinions Reevaluating Discretionary Acts; C. The Establishment of a Framework for Interrelation; IV. Why Jus in Bello Proportionality is Unique; A. The Context of Armed Conflict B. The Attribution of ActsC. The Permissive Nature of the Jus in Bello Regime; 8 Countermeasures and Counterinsurgency; I. Proportionate Countermeasures; II. Examples of Difficult Counterinsurgency Cases; 9 Human Shields and Risk; I. Forced Choices; II. International Law and Human Shields; III. Voluntary Human Shields; IV. Involuntary Human Shields; V. Risk and Concern about Civilians; VI. Adjusting the Rules of War so as Not to Favor Oppressors; 10 Targeted Killings and Proportionality in Law: Two Models; I. The Drone Strikes Controversy II. Status and Conduct: International Humanitarian Law and Domestic Law Enforcement |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910824493303321 |
|
Newton Michael A. <1962->
|
||
| New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2014 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||