Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Rule of law in the EU : 30 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall / / edited by Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Andreas Moberg & Joakim Nergelius
| Rule of law in the EU : 30 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall / / edited by Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Andreas Moberg & Joakim Nergelius |
| Edizione | [First edition.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | London [England] : , : Hart Publishing, , 2021 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (389 pages) |
| Disciplina | 349.4 |
| Collana | Swedish Studies in European Law |
| Soggetto topico |
Law - European Union countries
Constitutional law - European Union countries Constitutional & administrative law |
| ISBN |
1-5099-4162-2
1-5099-4160-6 1-5099-4161-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- List of Contributors -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. Rule of Law in the EU 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead -- PART ONE: THE RULE OF LAW IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND POLITICAL REALITY -- 2. Rule of Law Problems as Problems of Democracy -- 3. Illiberal Constitutionalism in East-Central Europe -- 4. Why the Rule of Law Can Never be Part of an 'Illiberal' Democracy -- PART TWO: THE RULE OF LAW IN CEE: COMMUNIST LEGACIES AND THE ROAD TO EU ACCESSION -- 5. Legacies of Socialist Constitutionalism: The Eastern European Judiciary -- 6. Legal Reasoning in Central and Eastern Europe from a Historical Perspective -- 7. The Council of Europe as an Antechamber to the European Union -- 8. The Role of the Venice Commission in Strengthening the Rule of Law -- 9. The Eastward Enlargement as a Driving Force and Testbed for Rule of Law Policy in the EU -- PART THREE: THE RULE OF LAW IN AN ENLARGED EUROPE -- 10. The Rule of Law in Italy under the Power of Populism, and its Impact on the Future of the EU: What the Pandemic Crisis Can Teach Us: Some Reflections on Populism, Europe, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights During the Time of Quarantine in Italy -- 11. The European Rule of Law Standard, the Nordic States, and EU Law -- PART FOUR: ENFORCING THE RULE OF LAW IN THE EU: CURRENT MECHANISMS AND PROSPECTS -- 12. The Rise of Procedural Rule of Law in the European Union - Historical and Normative Foundations -- 13. The European Commission and the EU Rule of Law Policy -- 14. Respect for the Rule of Law: Some Thoughts on the European Parliament's Perspective -- 15. Can We Expect Compliance with the Rule of Law without the Rule of Law? -- Index. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910717410803321 |
| London [England] : , : Hart Publishing, , 2021 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
YSEC yearbook of socio-economic constitutions 2020 : a Common European Law on Investment Screening (CELIS) / / Steffen Hindelang, Andreas Moberg, editors
| YSEC yearbook of socio-economic constitutions 2020 : a Common European Law on Investment Screening (CELIS) / / Steffen Hindelang, Andreas Moberg, editors |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2021] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (xi, 852 pages) |
| Disciplina | 346.4092 |
| Collana | YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions |
| Soggetto topico | Investments - Law and legislation - European Union countries |
| ISBN | 3-030-43757-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Intro -- Foreword: A Common European Law on Investment Screening -- Contents -- Towards a ``Common European Law on Investment Screening (CELIS)´´ -- Part I: Economic and Political Context -- The Political Economy of Capital Controls and Liberalization in the European Union -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Brief Historical Overview -- 2.1 Economic Motives -- 2.2 Political Motives -- 3 The Erga Omnes Principle -- 4 History Revisited: The Case of Japan -- 5 The European Investment Screening Proposals -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Investment Screening: The Return of Protectionism? A Business Perspective -- 1 The Issue -- 2 The EU Reaction and Its Legal Implications -- 3 Evaluation from a Business Perspective -- 3.1 Investment Screening Mechanism -- 3.2 EU Investment Policy -- 4 Conclusion -- References -- Investment Screening: The Return of Protectionism? A Political Account -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Calls for a More Restrictive Approach to FDI -- 3 Calls for a Liberal Approach to FDIs -- 4 Contextualisation of the EU Screening Regulation -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- The Birth of the EU Screening Regulation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The EU Needs to Ensure a Level Playing Field for Foreign Direct Investments -- 3 How Does the Screening of FDI Fit in the Framework of EU Law? -- 3.1 Free Movement of Capital -- 3.2 Definition of Foreign Direct Investment -- 3.3 Security Reviews -- 4 From Idea to Regulation: The Evolution of the EU Screening Regulation -- 4.1 EPP Group Proposal for a Union Act on the Screening of Foreign Investment in Strategic Sectors -- 4.2 Light Bulb Moment: State of Union in September 2017 -- 4.3 The EC Proposal from September 2017 -- 4.4 Position of the European Parliament as Adopted in May 2018 -- 4.5 The Provisional First Reading Agreement (Trilogue) -- 4.6 The Achievement of the First Reading Agreement: A Win-Win Situation.
5 Conclusions -- References -- Part II: The European Origins - the EU Member States' Rules on Screening Foreign Investment -- Foreign Investment Screening in Germany and France -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Germany -- 2.1 Cross-Sectoral Review -- 2.1.1 Scope of Application -- 2.1.1.1 Object of Acquisition: ``Domestic Company´´ -- Definition of ``Domestic´´ -- Definition of ``Company´´ -- 2.1.1.2 Foreign Investor -- Parallel Application on State and Private Investors -- Prevention of Misuse and Circumvention Pursuant to Sec. 55(2) AWV -- 2.1.1.3 Acquisition Transaction (Erwerbsgeschäft) -- Company Acquisition -- Acquisition of Shareholding -- Acquisition Threshold -- Attribution of Voting Rights -- 2.1.1.4 Acquisition of Further Shareholdings -- 2.1.1.5 Iterative Acquisition of Additional Voting Rights -- 2.1.1.6 Agreements on Exercising Voting Rights -- 2.1.1.7 Indirect Acquisitions -- 2.1.2 Threat to Public Order or Security -- 2.1.3 Scrutiny Procedure -- 2.1.4 The Ministry´s Powers to Act -- 2.1.5 Certificate of Non-objection Pursuant to Sec. 58 AWV -- 2.1.6 Legal Consequences -- 2.1.7 Legal Protection -- 2.2 Sector-Specific Review -- 2.2.1 General -- 2.2.1.1 Scope of Application -- 2.2.1.2 Threat to ``Essential Security Interests´´ -- 2.2.2 Scrutiny Procedure -- 2.3 Comparative Description -- 3 France -- 3.1 Investment Control Regime -- 3.1.1 Regulated Economic Sectors -- 3.1.2 Definition of ``Foreign Investor´´ -- 3.1.3 Authorization Requirement -- 3.1.3.1 EU Investor -- 3.1.3.2 Non-EU Investor -- 3.1.3.3 French-Controlled Foreign Investor -- 3.1.4 Exemptions -- 3.2 Scrutiny Procedure -- 3.3 National Interest Clearance/Ministry´s Power to Act -- 3.4 Legal Consequences -- 3.5 Sanctions -- 3.6 Legal Protection -- 4 Implications of the EU Screening Regulation -- References -- Foreign Investment Screening in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece. 1 Introduction -- 2 Investment Screening in Greece and the Lack of a Formal Screening Mechanism -- 2.1 Private Investment Aid Schemes: Law 4399 of 2016 -- 2.2 The Promotion of Strategic Investment: Laws 4146/2013 and 3908/2011 -- 2.3 The EU Screening Regulation and the Absence of a Screening Mechanism -- 3 A Liberal Approach to Foreign Investment: Spain´s Screening Mechanism -- 3.1 The Scope of Application of the Spanish Screening Mechanism -- 3.2 The Screening Procedure -- 3.3 Considerations on the Implementation of the EU Screening Regulation in Spain -- 4 Discretion and Foreign Investment Screening: The Case of Portugal -- 4.1 The ``Opposition Procedure´´ -- 4.2 The ``Opposition Procedure´´ and the EU Screening Regulation -- 5 Mitigation over Objection: The Screening of Foreign Investment in Italy -- 5.1 The Screening Procedure and Its Scope of Application -- 5.2 The Screening of Investments in Investments in Energy, Transport and Telecommunication -- 5.3 The Italian Screening Mechanism and the EU Screening Regulation -- 6 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Foreign Investment Screening in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Poland -- 2.1 Principal Laws Governing Investment Screening -- 2.2 Screening Mechanism According to the Law on Control of Certain Investments -- 2.2.1 Investors Subject to Screening -- 2.2.2 Protected Enterprises -- 2.2.3 Transactions Subject to Screening -- 2.2.4 Screening Criteria -- 2.2.5 Competent Authorities -- 2.2.6 Procedure -- 2.2.7 Administrative and Judicial Review -- 2.2.8 Consequences of Unlawful Transactions -- 2.2.9 LCCI in Action -- 2.3 The Polish Law on Control of Certain Investments in the Light of the EU Screening Regulation -- 2.4 Conclusion -- 3 Lithuania -- 3.1 Principal Laws Concerning Investment Screening. 3.2 Screening Mechanism According to the Law on the Protection of Objects of Importance to Ensuring National Security -- 3.2.1 Investors Subject to Screening -- 3.2.2 Protected Objects -- 3.2.3 Transactions Subject to Screening -- 3.2.4 Screening Criteria -- 3.2.5 Competent Authorities -- 3.2.6 Procedure -- 3.2.7 Judicial Review -- 3.2.8 Consequences of Unlawful Transactions -- 3.3 Law on the Protection of Objects of Importance to Ensuring National Security in the Light of the EU Screening Regulation -- 3.4 Conclusions -- 4 Latvia -- 4.1 Principal Laws Concerning Investment Screening -- 4.2 Screening Mechanism According to the National Security Law -- 4.2.1 Investors Subject to Screening -- 4.2.2 Protected Objects -- 4.2.3 Transactions Subject to Screening -- 4.2.4 Screening Criteria -- 4.2.5 Competent Authorities -- 4.2.6 Procedure -- 4.2.7 Administrative and Judicial Review -- 4.2.8 Consequences of Unlawful Transactions -- 4.3 National Security Law in the Light of the Screening Regulation -- 4.4 Conclusions -- References -- Foreign Investment Screening in Hungary and Romania -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Romanian Competition Law No 21/1996 -- 3 The Scope of Application of Hungarian Law LVII of 2018 -- 3.1 The `Foreign´ Investor -- 3.2 `Operating´ in Hungary -- 3.3 In a `Sensitive´ Economic Sector -- 3.4 Ratione Temporis -- 4 The Procedural Framework Set Out by Hungarian Law LVII of 2018 -- 4.1 The Obligations of the Foreign Investor -- 4.2 The Procedure and Judicial Redress -- 4.3 The Effects of the Minister´s Decision -- 4.4 What if Investors Do Not Comply with the Obligation to Declare Their Activities? -- 5 The Interplay with the EU Screening Regulation -- 5.1 The Subject Matter and Scope -- 5.2 The Procedural Mechanisms -- 5.3 Factors to Be Taken into Consideration -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Reports and Studies -- National and EU Legislation. Foreign Investment Screening in Finland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark -- 1 Introduction: Investment Screening in Four Nordic Countries -- 2 Monitoring Acquisitions in Finland -- 2.1 Which Acquisitions Are Screened? -- 2.2 Which Sectors and Factors Are Considered When Determining to Allow an Investment? -- 2.3 Which Procedure Is Applied When Determining Whether to Allow an Investment? -- 2.4 Competence and Reasons for Rejection -- 2.5 Legal Consequences and the Possibility to Appeal -- 3 Norway´s Security Act -- 3.1 The Former and New Norwegian Security Act on Protective Security Agreements -- 3.2 Monitoring Acquisitions in Norway -- 3.2.1 Which Sectors and Factors Are Considered? -- 3.2.2 What Are the Reasons for Rejection? -- 3.2.3 The Possibility to Appeal -- 4 Sweden and the Protective Security Act -- 4.1 A Proposal for a New Protective Security Act -- 4.1.1 Which Acquisitions Are (or Should Be) Monitored? -- 4.2 Sweden and a Limited Investment Screening Act -- 4.2.1 What Investments Are to Be Screened? -- 4.2.2 Which Factors Are Considered? -- 4.2.3 What Are the Reasons for Rejection? -- 4.2.4 The Possibility to Appeal -- 4.3 Sweden and a Comprehensive Investment Screening Act -- 5 Denmark -- 6 Similarities and Differences -- References -- Part III: Existing EU Secondary Legislation on (Discriminatory) Treatment of Third Country Investments - A Plurality of Regula... -- The Banking and Insurance Sector -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Outset -- 1.2 The EU Screening Regulation and Prudential Ownership Control Procedures -- 1.3 Prudential Ownership Control Procedures -- 1.3.1 Objectives, Requirements and Responsibilities -- 1.3.2 Third Country Investors -- 1.4 FDI Screening Mechanisms Under the EU Screening Regulation -- 1.4.1 Basic Elements of the EU Screening Regulation -- 1.4.2 Screening Mechanism for Financial Institutions. 1.4.3 Flexibility of the Member States. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910483944503321 |
| Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2021] | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 2021 [[electronic resource] ] : Triangulating Freedom of Speech / / edited by Steffen Hindelang, Andreas Moberg
| YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 2021 [[electronic resource] ] : Triangulating Freedom of Speech / / edited by Steffen Hindelang, Andreas Moberg |
| Edizione | [1st ed. 2022.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2022 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (266 pages) |
| Disciplina | 323.443 |
| Collana | YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions |
| Soggetto topico |
Information technology - Law and legislation
Mass media - Law and legislation Digital media Constitutional law Human rights IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property Digital and New Media European Politics Constitutional Law Human Rights |
| ISBN | 3-031-08514-0 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Introduction -- Part I - Constitutional Challenges Protecting the Freedom of Speech after the Technology Shift: The Impact of the New Mediators of the Digital Age on Freedom of Speech -- Freedom of Speech in the Digital Era – Leveraging its Constitutional and Social Ramifications -- Internet Platforms and Freedom of Expression in Constitution-Making -- Part II - Regulating Freedom of Speech after the Technology Shift: Let the Robot Speak! AI-generated Speech and Freedom of Expression -- Private Life, Freedom of Expression and the Role of Transnational Digital Platforms. A European Perspective -- The Freedom to Conduct a Business as a Counterargument to Limit Platform Users’ Freedom of Expression -- Who Watches the Watchmen? – Social Media and Election Securitization -- Part III - Indirect Regulation for the Protection of the Freedom of Speech: The Marketplace of Ideas and EU Competition Law: Can Antitrust Be Used to Protect the Freedom of Speech? -- Building a Surveillance State in a Digital Age and What Export Control can(not) do about it? -- Part IV - Book Reviews: Anil Yilmaz Vastardis, The Nationality of Corporate Investors under International Investment Law -- Nicolás M. Perrone, Investment Treaties and the Legal Imagination: How Foreign Investors Play by Their Own Rules. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910584474703321 |
| Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2022 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 2023 : Law and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
| YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 2023 : Law and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence |
| Autore | Gill-Pedro Eduardo |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham : , : Springer, , 2024 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (356 pages) |
| Altri autori (Persone) | MobergAndreas |
| Collana | YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions Series |
| ISBN | 3-031-55832-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Intro -- Contents -- Law and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence -- 1 AI Governance -- 2 Law as a Governance Tool -- 3 The Challenges of Regulating AI -- 3.1 AI as the Subject of Governance -- 3.2 AI and the Disruption of Current Governance Regimes -- 4 Engaging with the Governance Challenge: This Volume´s Contribution -- 4.1 Conclusion -- References -- Part I -- AI Regulation in the EU: The Future Interplay Between Frameworks -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Challenges of Regulating AI -- 3 The AI Act as the Heart of the Regulatory Framework -- 4 Other Relevant Pieces of Legislation -- 4.1 Data -- 4.1.1 The GDPR -- 4.1.2 The Data Governance Act -- 4.1.3 The Data Act -- 4.2 Safety: The General Product Safety Regulation -- 4.3 Liability -- 4.3.1 The AI Liability Directive -- 4.3.2 The Product Liability Directive -- 5 Interplay Issues -- 5.1 Regulatory Gaps -- 5.2 Inconsistencies Between Frameworks -- 5.3 Terminology -- 6 Concluding Remarks -- References -- The AI Act´s Research Exemption: A Mechanism for Regulatory Arbitrage? -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Concept of Academic Research -- 3 The AI Act and the Research Exemption -- 4 Research Conducted for Commercial or Financial Reasons -- 5 Academic Research on the Path to Commercialization -- 6 Researchers Provide AI to Their Employing Institutions or Other Public Bodies -- 7 Researchers Build High-risk or Prohibited AI and Other Actors Copy It -- 8 Research that Takes Place ``in the Wild´´ or in Regulatory Sandboxes -- 9 Discussion -- 10 Conclusion -- Legislation -- Proposed Legislation -- Case Law -- References -- Journals and Articles -- Books and Chapters -- Proceedings and Conference Papers -- Online Publications -- Part II -- Governance of AI or Governance by AI: Limits, New Threats, and Unnegotiable Principles -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Human-Rights-Based Approach -- 2.1 Group Privacy.
2.2 Biometric Psychography -- 2.3 Neurorights -- 3 Living Human Rights, or the Role of the Courts -- 4 Conclusions and Future Research -- References -- A Horizontal Meta-effect? Theorising Human Rights in the AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Instruments -- 3 Human and Fundamental Rights at the Core -- 3.1 Human Rights in the Directive -- 3.2 Fundamental Rights in the Act -- 4 Weak Rights Transformed -- 4.1 Fuzzy Rights for the Foreseeable Future -- 4.2 `Appropriate Measures´ Instead of Human Rights -- 4.3 Acceptable Fundamental Rights Violations -- 5 Theorising the Horizontal Meta-effect -- 5.1 Sensing with Rights -- 5.2 Planning with and Acting on Rights -- 6 Political Implications and Future Trajectories -- References -- Everybody Wants To Rule the World: The Relevance of the Rule of Law for Private Law in the Context of Algorithmic Profiling of... -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Problem Outline: The Erosion of Fundamental Rights in the Context of Algorithmic Profiling of Online Users -- 2.1 The Use of Algorithms for Online Profiling -- 2.1.1 Personal Data -- 2.1.2 Statistical Data -- 2.1.3 Proxies Data -- 2.2 The EU Legislative Framework of Algorithmic Profiling: Public Regulations v. Private Self-Regulation -- 2.2.1 General Data Protection Regulation -- 2.2.2 Proposal for an AI Act Regulation -- 2.2.3 Digital Services Act Regulation -- 2.2.4 Digital Markets Act Regulation -- 2.3 Fundamental Rights Are Threatened by Algorithmic Profiling Online -- 2.3.1 Right to Privacy -- 2.3.2 Right Not To Be Unlawfully Discriminated -- 2.3.3 Right to Freedom of Expression -- 3 The Solution: The Function of the Rule of Law to Secure the Respect of Fundamental Rights in the Context of Algorithmic Prof... -- 3.1 The Rule of Law in the EU: A Stronghold for the Protection of Fundamental Rights. 3.1.1 The Rule of Law in the EU -- 3.1.2 The `Public Law Presumption´ -- 3.1.3 The Rule of Law and Private Parties -- 3.2 The Relevance of the Rule of Law to Create Legal Guardrails Around Private Self-Regulation of Online Platforms -- 3.3 The Function of the Rule of Law to Secure the Respect of Fundamental Rights of Users from Algorithmic Profiling by Online ... -- 3.3.1 Non-Arbitrariness v. Freedom to Pursue One´s Own Ends -- 3.3.2 The ``Indeterminacy of the Law´´ Debate v. Self-Regulation of Private Parties -- 3.3.3 Predictability v. Opacity -- 3.3.4 Equality v. Digital Power Concentration -- 3.3.5 Protection of Fundamental Rights v. Relinquishing of Unwaivable Rights via Unilateral, `Mass-Market Boilerplate´ Provisi... -- 4 Conclusions -- Legislation and Legal Acts -- Case Law (in Antichronological Order) -- Online Resources -- References -- Books and Papers -- AI-Based Decision-Making and the Human Oversight Requirement Under the AI Act -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Regulation of High-Risk AI and Human Oversight -- 3 Use of High-Risk AI, Automated Decisions and the GDPR -- 4 Justification of Automated Decisions and High-Risk AI -- 5 Impact Assessments and High-Risk AI -- 6 Automated Decision-Making and Low-Risk AI -- 7 Conclusions -- EU Legislative Acts -- EU Proposals -- Other Public Print -- Case Law of the European Court of Justice -- Opinions European Court of Justice -- UK Case Law -- European Patent Office Case Law -- Online Resources -- References -- Monographs -- Chapters in Anthologies -- Articles -- Part III -- Algorithmic Hiring Systems: Implications and Recommendations for Organisations and Policymakers -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Organisations´ Views on the Potential Benefits of Using Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 3 Four Emerging Risks in the Algorithmic Hiring System Context. 3.1 Data Privacy Concerns Resulting from Collecting Job Applicant Data -- 3.2 Data Privacy Concerns Resulting from Integrating Employee Surveillance Data with Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 3.3 Algorithmic Hiring Bias Concerns Resulting from Job Applicant and Employee Data Collection -- 3.4 Concerns Regarding Ongoing Oversight of Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 4 How Organisations Can Support the Responsible Development and Use of Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 4.1 Develop a Culture of Control in the Development and Use of Algorithms in the Hiring Process -- 4.2 Ensure Robust, Centralised Control Over Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 4.3 Ensure Ongoing Performance Monitoring of Algorithmic Hiring Systems and Accountability for Results -- 5 How Policymakers Can Support the Responsible Development and Use of Algorithmic Hiring Systems Within Organisations -- 5.1 Create AI Governance Frameworks that Foster Responsible Development and Utilisation of Algorithmic Hiring Systems Within O... -- 5.2 Protect Job Applicants and Employees from Risks Associated with Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 5.3 Establish an AI Oversight and Coordination Agency that Oversees Algorithmic Hiring Systems and Collects Incidents Related ... -- 5.4 Collect, Analyse, and Report Failures and Incidents Caused by Algorithmic Hiring Systems -- 6 Summary and Conclusion -- References -- Journals and Articles -- Books and Chapters -- Proceedings and Conference Papers -- Online Publications -- Laws, Guidelines, Cases of International Institutions, Countries/Areas -- EU -- Cases -- Japan -- U.S.A. -- Newspapers and Press Releases -- AI Gender Biases in Women´s Healthcare: Perspectives from the United Kingdom and the European Legal Space -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Gender Gap in Medicine and Healthcare -- 3 Systemic Biases in Women´s Healthcare and AI Algorithm Biases. 3.1 Androcentricity in Medicine and Healthcare -- 3.2 Algorithm Gender Biases in AI -- 4 The Regulatory Framework for AI in Healthcare -- 4.1 The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) -- 4.2 The Council of Europe Consolidated Working Draft Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Democracy ... -- 4.3 The UK´s Pro-Innovation Approach to Artificial Intelligence Regulation -- 5 Incorporating Data Feminism as a Reflective Tool for Gender Equality -- 5.1 Intersectionality in Data Feminism -- 5.2 Using Data Feminism to Enhance Gender Health Equality -- 5.3 Beyond Data Feminism: Health Ecosystems, Bottom-Up Regulatory Approaches, and Gender Medicine for AI and Women´s Healthcare -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- The Role of AI in Mental Health Applications and Liability -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Why Are Mobile Health Applications a Vital Topic for European Healthcare Systems? -- 1.2 Preparedness of Society for Mental Health Apps as the Standard Device in Healthcare -- 1.3 Concerns in Using Mental Health Applications for Diagnosis, Treatment and Monitoring of Patients -- 2 Legal Basis for Using Mental Health Applications -- 2.1 What Happens if the Mental Health Application Is Considered a Medical Device? -- 2.2 Mental Health Applications Do Not Have To Be Certified as a Medical Device -- 3 Users´ Perspectives of AI in Mental Health Applications -- 3.1 Determination of Relevant Factors to Identify the Riskiness of MHAs -- 3.2 Classification of Mental Health Applications According to the Level of Risk for Users -- 3.3 Bias as a Possible Cause of Damage to the Health of Mental Health Apps Users -- 4 Liability Concerning the Mental Health Applications -- 4.1 Application of the Product Liability Directive on the Mental Health Applications -- 4.2 De Lege Ferenda: Better Protection of User? -- 5 Conclusion -- Legislation. Online Publications. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910855376903321 |
Gill-Pedro Eduardo
|
||
| Cham : , : Springer, , 2024 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||