Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook
| Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook |
| Edizione | [Second edition /] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (641 p.) |
| Disciplina | 614/.15 |
| Soggetto topico |
Forensic psychology
Mentally ill offenders Forensic psychiatry |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
0-19-026167-6
0-19-994156-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Teaching Point:What is the value of specialized forensic assessment instruments in forensic mental health assessment?CASE TWO Principle: Use case-specific (idiographic) evidence in assessing clinical condition, functional abilities, and causal Connection; Teaching Point:What are the limits of specialized forensic assessment instruments?; 3 Competence to Stand Trial; CASE ONEPrinciple: Use testing when indicated in assessing response style (Principle 26); Teaching Point:Integrating Different Sources of Response Style Data
CASE TWO Principle: Select the most appropriate model to guide in data gathering, interpretation, and communication (Principle 16)Teaching Point:How can you use a model to structure the way you write the report?; CASE THREEPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point: Separating and integrating data from different sources through source attribution in analyzing, reasoning about and communicating FMHA results; 4 Criminal Responsibility CASE ONE Principle: Be familiar with the relevant legal, ethical, scientific, and practice literatures pertaining to FMHA (Principle 3)Teaching Point:Sources of particularly relevant information from the literature; CASE TWOPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point:Line-by-line versus paragraph-level attribution (contributed by Daniel Murrie); CASE THREEPrinciple: Decline the referral when evaluator impartiality is unlikely (Principle 10); Teaching Point:Remaining impartial in high visibility cases; 5 Sexual Offending Risk Evaluation CASE ONE Principle: Provide appropriate notification of purpose and obtain appropriate authorization before beginning (Principle 23)Teaching Point:Obtaining informed consent in sexually violent predator cases; 6 Federal Sentencing; CASE ONEPrinciple: Describe findings so that they need change little under cross-examination (Principle 31); Teaching Point:Communicating findings to accurately reflect their strength and the evaluator's confidence in them; CASE TWO Principle: Use scientific reasoning in assessing the causal connection between clinical condition and functional abilities Teaching Point:Risk-need assessment in sentencing |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910453666703321 |
| Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook
| Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook |
| Edizione | [Second edition /] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (641 p.) |
| Disciplina | 614/.15 |
| Soggetto topico |
Forensic psychology
Mentally ill offenders Forensic psychiatry |
| ISBN |
0-19-026167-6
0-19-994156-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Teaching Point:What is the value of specialized forensic assessment instruments in forensic mental health assessment?CASE TWO Principle: Use case-specific (idiographic) evidence in assessing clinical condition, functional abilities, and causal Connection; Teaching Point:What are the limits of specialized forensic assessment instruments?; 3 Competence to Stand Trial; CASE ONEPrinciple: Use testing when indicated in assessing response style (Principle 26); Teaching Point:Integrating Different Sources of Response Style Data
CASE TWO Principle: Select the most appropriate model to guide in data gathering, interpretation, and communication (Principle 16)Teaching Point:How can you use a model to structure the way you write the report?; CASE THREEPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point: Separating and integrating data from different sources through source attribution in analyzing, reasoning about and communicating FMHA results; 4 Criminal Responsibility CASE ONE Principle: Be familiar with the relevant legal, ethical, scientific, and practice literatures pertaining to FMHA (Principle 3)Teaching Point:Sources of particularly relevant information from the literature; CASE TWOPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point:Line-by-line versus paragraph-level attribution (contributed by Daniel Murrie); CASE THREEPrinciple: Decline the referral when evaluator impartiality is unlikely (Principle 10); Teaching Point:Remaining impartial in high visibility cases; 5 Sexual Offending Risk Evaluation CASE ONE Principle: Provide appropriate notification of purpose and obtain appropriate authorization before beginning (Principle 23)Teaching Point:Obtaining informed consent in sexually violent predator cases; 6 Federal Sentencing; CASE ONEPrinciple: Describe findings so that they need change little under cross-examination (Principle 31); Teaching Point:Communicating findings to accurately reflect their strength and the evaluator's confidence in them; CASE TWO Principle: Use scientific reasoning in assessing the causal connection between clinical condition and functional abilities Teaching Point:Risk-need assessment in sentencing |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910791052703321 |
| Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook
| Forensic mental health assessment : a casebook |
| Edizione | [Second edition /] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (641 p.) |
| Disciplina | 614/.15 |
| Soggetto topico |
Forensic psychology
Mentally ill offenders Forensic psychiatry |
| ISBN |
0-19-026167-6
0-19-994156-4 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Teaching Point:What is the value of specialized forensic assessment instruments in forensic mental health assessment?CASE TWO Principle: Use case-specific (idiographic) evidence in assessing clinical condition, functional abilities, and causal Connection; Teaching Point:What are the limits of specialized forensic assessment instruments?; 3 Competence to Stand Trial; CASE ONEPrinciple: Use testing when indicated in assessing response style (Principle 26); Teaching Point:Integrating Different Sources of Response Style Data
CASE TWO Principle: Select the most appropriate model to guide in data gathering, interpretation, and communication (Principle 16)Teaching Point:How can you use a model to structure the way you write the report?; CASE THREEPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point: Separating and integrating data from different sources through source attribution in analyzing, reasoning about and communicating FMHA results; 4 Criminal Responsibility CASE ONE Principle: Be familiar with the relevant legal, ethical, scientific, and practice literatures pertaining to FMHA (Principle 3)Teaching Point:Sources of particularly relevant information from the literature; CASE TWOPrinciple: Attribute information to sources (Principle 32); Teaching Point:Line-by-line versus paragraph-level attribution (contributed by Daniel Murrie); CASE THREEPrinciple: Decline the referral when evaluator impartiality is unlikely (Principle 10); Teaching Point:Remaining impartial in high visibility cases; 5 Sexual Offending Risk Evaluation CASE ONE Principle: Provide appropriate notification of purpose and obtain appropriate authorization before beginning (Principle 23)Teaching Point:Obtaining informed consent in sexually violent predator cases; 6 Federal Sentencing; CASE ONEPrinciple: Describe findings so that they need change little under cross-examination (Principle 31); Teaching Point:Communicating findings to accurately reflect their strength and the evaluator's confidence in them; CASE TWO Principle: Use scientific reasoning in assessing the causal connection between clinical condition and functional abilities Teaching Point:Risk-need assessment in sentencing |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910809666203321 |
| Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , [2014] | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||