Sexual assault and the justice gap : a question of attitude / Jennifer Temkin and Barbara Krahe |
Autore | Temkin Jennifer |
Edizione | [1st ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 345.02532 |
Collana | Criminal Law Library, v. 5 |
Soggetto topico |
Rape
Rape - Public opinion Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration Women - Crimes against |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
1-4725-6432-4
1-281-79161-X 9786611791612 1-84731-420-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | PART I THE BACKGROUND -- 1 The Justice Gap in Sexual Assault Cases -- 1.1 THE PROBLEM OF ATTRITION -- 1.2 THE LEGAL BACKGROUND -- 1.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 2 Stereotypes, Myths and Heuristics in the Perception of Sexual Assault -- 2.1 THE 'REAL RAPE' STEREOTYPE -- 2.2 RAPE MYTHS AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDES ABOUT RAPE VICTIMS -- 2.3 RAPE STEREOTYPES AND POLICE RESPONSES TO RAPE COMPLAINTS -- 2.4 THE ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME TO VICTIMS OF RAPE -- 2.5 HEURISTICS IN THE PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT -- 2.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 3 The Problem of the Jury in Sexual Assault Trials -- 3.1 THE METHODOLOGY OF JURY STUDIES -- 3.2 DEALING WITH THE EVIDENCE -- 3.3 THE ROLE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY -- 3.4 THE JUDGE'S SUMMING-UP AND NON-VERBAL CUES -- 3.5 REACHING A VERDICT -- 3.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART II NEW EVIDENCE -- 4 A Question of Attitude: Prospective Lawyers -- 4.1 STUDY 1: UNDERGRADUATE LAW STUDENTS AND THE REAL RAPE STEREOTYPE -- 4.2 STUDY 2: SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY VOCATIONAL LAW STUDENTS -- 5 A Question of Attitude: The General Public -- 5.1 STUDY 3: EXPLORING SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -- 5.2 STUDY 3: EVALUATING A RAPE-AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN -- 5.3 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS FROM THE THREE STUDIES -- 6 Rape, Rape Trials and the Justice Gap: Some Views from the Bench and Bar -- 6.1 METHODOLOGY OF THE INTERVIEW STUDY -- 6.2 THE PERCEIVED PROBLEMS -- 6.3 ATTITUDES TOWARDS RAPE AND THE JUSTICE GAP -- 6.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 7 Judges, Barristers and the Evidential Law in Action in Rape Cases -- 7.1 CORROBORATION -- 7.2 SEXUAL HISTORY -- 7.3 THIRD PARTY DISCLOSURE -- 7.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART III SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS -- 8 Law Reform -- 8.1 EVIDENTIAL ISSUES -- 8.2 CONSENT AND INTOXICATION -- 8.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 9 Improving Rape Trials -- 9.1 ABOLISHING THE JURY IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES -- 9.2 SCREENING AND SELECTING JURORS -- 9.3 ASSISTING THE JURY -- 9.4 MAKING THE JURY ACCOUNTABLE -- 9.5 EDUCATING LEGAL PROFESSIONALS -- 9.6 APPOINTMENT OF MORE FEMALE JUDGES? -- 9.7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 10 Changing Public Attitudes -- 10.1 RAPE PREVENTION PROGRAMMES FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS -- 10.2 SCHOOL-BASED INTERVENTIONS -- 10.3 EDUCATING THE GENERAL PUBLIC ABOUT RAPE: USING THE MEDIA -- 10.4 CHANGING NORMS ABOUT SEXUAL AGGRESSION -- 10.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 11 Conclusion |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910453892403321 |
Temkin Jennifer
![]() |
||
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Sexual assault and the justice gap : a question of attitude / Jennifer Temkin and Barbara Krahe |
Autore | Temkin Jennifer |
Edizione | [1st ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 345.02532 |
Collana | Criminal Law Library, v. 5 |
Soggetto topico |
Rape
Rape - Public opinion Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration Women - Crimes against |
ISBN |
1-4725-6432-4
1-281-79161-X 9786611791612 1-84731-420-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | PART I THE BACKGROUND -- 1 The Justice Gap in Sexual Assault Cases -- 1.1 THE PROBLEM OF ATTRITION -- 1.2 THE LEGAL BACKGROUND -- 1.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 2 Stereotypes, Myths and Heuristics in the Perception of Sexual Assault -- 2.1 THE 'REAL RAPE' STEREOTYPE -- 2.2 RAPE MYTHS AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDES ABOUT RAPE VICTIMS -- 2.3 RAPE STEREOTYPES AND POLICE RESPONSES TO RAPE COMPLAINTS -- 2.4 THE ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME TO VICTIMS OF RAPE -- 2.5 HEURISTICS IN THE PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT -- 2.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 3 The Problem of the Jury in Sexual Assault Trials -- 3.1 THE METHODOLOGY OF JURY STUDIES -- 3.2 DEALING WITH THE EVIDENCE -- 3.3 THE ROLE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY -- 3.4 THE JUDGE'S SUMMING-UP AND NON-VERBAL CUES -- 3.5 REACHING A VERDICT -- 3.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART II NEW EVIDENCE -- 4 A Question of Attitude: Prospective Lawyers -- 4.1 STUDY 1: UNDERGRADUATE LAW STUDENTS AND THE REAL RAPE STEREOTYPE -- 4.2 STUDY 2: SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY VOCATIONAL LAW STUDENTS -- 5 A Question of Attitude: The General Public -- 5.1 STUDY 3: EXPLORING SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -- 5.2 STUDY 3: EVALUATING A RAPE-AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN -- 5.3 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS FROM THE THREE STUDIES -- 6 Rape, Rape Trials and the Justice Gap: Some Views from the Bench and Bar -- 6.1 METHODOLOGY OF THE INTERVIEW STUDY -- 6.2 THE PERCEIVED PROBLEMS -- 6.3 ATTITUDES TOWARDS RAPE AND THE JUSTICE GAP -- 6.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 7 Judges, Barristers and the Evidential Law in Action in Rape Cases -- 7.1 CORROBORATION -- 7.2 SEXUAL HISTORY -- 7.3 THIRD PARTY DISCLOSURE -- 7.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART III SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS -- 8 Law Reform -- 8.1 EVIDENTIAL ISSUES -- 8.2 CONSENT AND INTOXICATION -- 8.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 9 Improving Rape Trials -- 9.1 ABOLISHING THE JURY IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES -- 9.2 SCREENING AND SELECTING JURORS -- 9.3 ASSISTING THE JURY -- 9.4 MAKING THE JURY ACCOUNTABLE -- 9.5 EDUCATING LEGAL PROFESSIONALS -- 9.6 APPOINTMENT OF MORE FEMALE JUDGES? -- 9.7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 10 Changing Public Attitudes -- 10.1 RAPE PREVENTION PROGRAMMES FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS -- 10.2 SCHOOL-BASED INTERVENTIONS -- 10.3 EDUCATING THE GENERAL PUBLIC ABOUT RAPE: USING THE MEDIA -- 10.4 CHANGING NORMS ABOUT SEXUAL AGGRESSION -- 10.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 11 Conclusion |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910782216003321 |
Temkin Jennifer
![]() |
||
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Sexual assault and the justice gap : a question of attitude / / Jennifer Temkin and Barbara Krahe |
Autore | Temkin Jennifer |
Edizione | [1st ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (271 p.) |
Disciplina | 345.02532 |
Collana | Criminal Law Library, v. 5 |
Soggetto topico |
Rape
Rape - Public opinion Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration Women - Crimes against |
ISBN |
1-4725-6432-4
1-281-79161-X 9786611791612 1-84731-420-1 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto | PART I THE BACKGROUND -- 1 The Justice Gap in Sexual Assault Cases -- 1.1 THE PROBLEM OF ATTRITION -- 1.2 THE LEGAL BACKGROUND -- 1.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 2 Stereotypes, Myths and Heuristics in the Perception of Sexual Assault -- 2.1 THE 'REAL RAPE' STEREOTYPE -- 2.2 RAPE MYTHS AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDES ABOUT RAPE VICTIMS -- 2.3 RAPE STEREOTYPES AND POLICE RESPONSES TO RAPE COMPLAINTS -- 2.4 THE ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME TO VICTIMS OF RAPE -- 2.5 HEURISTICS IN THE PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT -- 2.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 3 The Problem of the Jury in Sexual Assault Trials -- 3.1 THE METHODOLOGY OF JURY STUDIES -- 3.2 DEALING WITH THE EVIDENCE -- 3.3 THE ROLE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY -- 3.4 THE JUDGE'S SUMMING-UP AND NON-VERBAL CUES -- 3.5 REACHING A VERDICT -- 3.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART II NEW EVIDENCE -- 4 A Question of Attitude: Prospective Lawyers -- 4.1 STUDY 1: UNDERGRADUATE LAW STUDENTS AND THE REAL RAPE STEREOTYPE -- 4.2 STUDY 2: SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY VOCATIONAL LAW STUDENTS -- 5 A Question of Attitude: The General Public -- 5.1 STUDY 3: EXPLORING SCHEMATIC PROCESSING BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -- 5.2 STUDY 3: EVALUATING A RAPE-AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN -- 5.3 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS FROM THE THREE STUDIES -- 6 Rape, Rape Trials and the Justice Gap: Some Views from the Bench and Bar -- 6.1 METHODOLOGY OF THE INTERVIEW STUDY -- 6.2 THE PERCEIVED PROBLEMS -- 6.3 ATTITUDES TOWARDS RAPE AND THE JUSTICE GAP -- 6.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 7 Judges, Barristers and the Evidential Law in Action in Rape Cases -- 7.1 CORROBORATION -- 7.2 SEXUAL HISTORY -- 7.3 THIRD PARTY DISCLOSURE -- 7.4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- PART III SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS -- 8 Law Reform -- 8.1 EVIDENTIAL ISSUES -- 8.2 CONSENT AND INTOXICATION -- 8.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 9 Improving Rape Trials -- 9.1 ABOLISHING THE JURY IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES -- 9.2 SCREENING AND SELECTING JURORS -- 9.3 ASSISTING THE JURY -- 9.4 MAKING THE JURY ACCOUNTABLE -- 9.5 EDUCATING LEGAL PROFESSIONALS -- 9.6 APPOINTMENT OF MORE FEMALE JUDGES? -- 9.7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 10 Changing Public Attitudes -- 10.1 RAPE PREVENTION PROGRAMMES FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS -- 10.2 SCHOOL-BASED INTERVENTIONS -- 10.3 EDUCATING THE GENERAL PUBLIC ABOUT RAPE: USING THE MEDIA -- 10.4 CHANGING NORMS ABOUT SEXUAL AGGRESSION -- 10.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS -- 11 Conclusion |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910817604803321 |
Temkin Jennifer
![]() |
||
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|