Peer review in health sciences [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson |
Edizione | [2nd ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | London, : BMJ Books, 2003 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (383 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.72 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
GodleeFiona
JeffersonTom |
Soggetto topico |
Peer review
Medicine - Research - Evaluation |
Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
ISBN |
0-470-79068-7
1-280-28536-2 9786610285365 1-4443-4168-5 0-585-49512-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review in Health Sciences; Contents; Contributors; Preface; Introduction; 1: Editorial peer review: its development and rationale; 2: Peer review of grant applications: a systematic review; 3: The state of evidence: what we know and what we don't know about journal peer review; 4: The effectiveness of journal peer review; 5: Innovation and peer review; 6: Bias, subjectivity, chance, and conflict of interest in editorial decisions; 7: Misconduct and journal peer review; 8: Peer review and the pharmaceutical industry; 9: Small journals and non-English language journals
10: How to set up a peer review system11: The evaluation and training of peer reviewers; 12: How to peer review a manuscript; 13: Statistical peer review; 14: Peer review of economic submissions; 15: How to peer review a qualitative manuscript; 16: Ethical conduct for reviewers of grant applications and manuscripts; 17: Non-peer review: consumer involvement in research review; 18: An author's guide to editorial peer review; 19: Peer review on the internet: are there faster, fairer, more effective methods of peer review? 20: The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach21: Alternatives to peer review I: peer and non-peer review; 22: Alternatives to peer review II: can peer review be better focused?; 23: Peer review: some questions from Socrates; 24: The future of peer review; Appendix A: the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group); Appendix B: the World Association of Medical Editors; Appendix C: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910455599003321 |
London, : BMJ Books, 2003 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Peer review in health sciences [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson |
Edizione | [2nd ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | London, : BMJ Books, 2003 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (383 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.72 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
GodleeFiona
JeffersonTom |
Soggetto topico |
Peer review
Medicine - Research - Evaluation |
ISBN |
0-470-79068-7
1-280-28536-2 9786610285365 1-4443-4168-5 0-585-49512-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review in Health Sciences; Contents; Contributors; Preface; Introduction; 1: Editorial peer review: its development and rationale; 2: Peer review of grant applications: a systematic review; 3: The state of evidence: what we know and what we don't know about journal peer review; 4: The effectiveness of journal peer review; 5: Innovation and peer review; 6: Bias, subjectivity, chance, and conflict of interest in editorial decisions; 7: Misconduct and journal peer review; 8: Peer review and the pharmaceutical industry; 9: Small journals and non-English language journals
10: How to set up a peer review system11: The evaluation and training of peer reviewers; 12: How to peer review a manuscript; 13: Statistical peer review; 14: Peer review of economic submissions; 15: How to peer review a qualitative manuscript; 16: Ethical conduct for reviewers of grant applications and manuscripts; 17: Non-peer review: consumer involvement in research review; 18: An author's guide to editorial peer review; 19: Peer review on the internet: are there faster, fairer, more effective methods of peer review? 20: The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach21: Alternatives to peer review I: peer and non-peer review; 22: Alternatives to peer review II: can peer review be better focused?; 23: Peer review: some questions from Socrates; 24: The future of peer review; Appendix A: the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group); Appendix B: the World Association of Medical Editors; Appendix C: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910780212903321 |
London, : BMJ Books, 2003 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|
Peer review in health sciences [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson |
Edizione | [2nd ed.] |
Pubbl/distr/stampa | London, : BMJ Books, 2003 |
Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (383 p.) |
Disciplina | 610.72 |
Altri autori (Persone) |
GodleeFiona
JeffersonTom |
Soggetto topico |
Peer review
Medicine - Research - Evaluation |
ISBN |
0-470-79068-7
1-280-28536-2 9786610285365 1-4443-4168-5 0-585-49512-2 |
Formato | Materiale a stampa ![]() |
Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
Nota di contenuto |
Peer Review in Health Sciences; Contents; Contributors; Preface; Introduction; 1: Editorial peer review: its development and rationale; 2: Peer review of grant applications: a systematic review; 3: The state of evidence: what we know and what we don't know about journal peer review; 4: The effectiveness of journal peer review; 5: Innovation and peer review; 6: Bias, subjectivity, chance, and conflict of interest in editorial decisions; 7: Misconduct and journal peer review; 8: Peer review and the pharmaceutical industry; 9: Small journals and non-English language journals
10: How to set up a peer review system11: The evaluation and training of peer reviewers; 12: How to peer review a manuscript; 13: Statistical peer review; 14: Peer review of economic submissions; 15: How to peer review a qualitative manuscript; 16: Ethical conduct for reviewers of grant applications and manuscripts; 17: Non-peer review: consumer involvement in research review; 18: An author's guide to editorial peer review; 19: Peer review on the internet: are there faster, fairer, more effective methods of peer review? 20: The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach21: Alternatives to peer review I: peer and non-peer review; 22: Alternatives to peer review II: can peer review be better focused?; 23: Peer review: some questions from Socrates; 24: The future of peer review; Appendix A: the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group); Appendix B: the World Association of Medical Editors; Appendix C: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); Index |
Record Nr. | UNINA-9910808244503321 |
London, : BMJ Books, 2003 | ||
![]() | ||
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
|