Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson
| Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson |
| Autore | Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, > |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (446 pages) |
| Disciplina | 231/.8 |
| Collana |
Brill's Studies in Intellectual History
Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History |
| Soggetto topico |
Calvinism
Theodicy Good and evil |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN | 90-04-32143-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front Matter / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Afterword / Michael W. Hickson -- Notes on the Text / Michael W. Hickson -- Bibliography / Michael W. Hickson -- Foreword / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- An Examination of Le Clerc’s Case against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Four Serious Problems with Le Clerc’s Objection That was Based on Several Inferences He Drew from Bayle’s Opinion / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc’s Zeal was Delayed / Michael W. Hickson -- Le Clerc’s Response to the Accusation of Socinianism / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether It is Possible to Reject an Evident Proposition / Michael W. Hickson -- What Le Clerc Said Concerning the Trinity and the Pyrrhonian Abbé / Michael W. Hickson -- Discussion of Le Clerc’s Remarks on the Three Propositions to Which Bayle Reduced His Own Position / Michael W. Hickson -- Retortion of Le Clerc’s Accusations / Michael W. Hickson -- That Le Clerc Delivers Religion, as Well as Himself, Hands and Feet Bound, over to the Atheists / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc Had Recourse to the Same Refuge as Bayle; An Addition to What He Said Concerning the Trinity / Michael W. Hickson -- Plastic Natures / Michael W. Hickson -- Several Remarks on Origenism / Michael W. Hickson -- What is the Nature of Tolerance According to Le Clerc? / Michael W. Hickson -- General Reflections on the Proceedings of Le Clerc against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot is an Arminian Neophyte / Michael W. Hickson -- First of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacked Bayle’s Doctrine without Admitting That He Knew That It was the Same as That of the Reformed, and He Pretended to Believe That It was Very Different / Michael W. Hickson -- Second of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Believes That the Same Doctrine is Innocent or Blameworthy Depending on the Intentions of Those Who Teach It / Michael W. Hickson -- Third of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Claims That Bayle Removes Every Sort of Freedom from Man / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether There is Something That Could Have Misled Jaquelot. Two Characteristics of Bayle’s Dictionary / Michael W. Hickson -- Fourth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacks Bayle on the Agreement of Faith and Reason, yet in the End He Says the Same Thing as Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Three Differences That Jaquelot Found between His and Bayle’s Doctrines / Michael W. Hickson -- Reflection on the Phrases ‘Abandoning Reason’ and ‘being Contrary to Reason’ / Michael W. Hickson -- That It Appears by the State of the Question Given by Bayle That There is No Real Dispute between Him and Jaquelot / Michael W. Hickson -- Fifth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Sought a Compromise That Nobook-body Needed / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of Jaquelot’s Reply to the Difficulties Concerning the Origin of Evil. He Abandons Common Notions / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot Should Have Focused on the Question of Whether Bayle Believes That God is the Author of Sin / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Five Principles That Jaquelot Substituted for the Common Notions That He Rejected / Michael W. Hickson. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910511430403321 |
Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, >
|
||
| Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson
| Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson |
| Autore | Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, > |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (446 pages) |
| Disciplina | 231/.8 |
| Collana |
Brill's Studies in Intellectual History
Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History |
| Soggetto topico |
Calvinism
Theodicy Good and evil |
| ISBN | 90-04-32143-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front Matter / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Afterword / Michael W. Hickson -- Notes on the Text / Michael W. Hickson -- Bibliography / Michael W. Hickson -- Foreword / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- An Examination of Le Clerc’s Case against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Four Serious Problems with Le Clerc’s Objection That was Based on Several Inferences He Drew from Bayle’s Opinion / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc’s Zeal was Delayed / Michael W. Hickson -- Le Clerc’s Response to the Accusation of Socinianism / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether It is Possible to Reject an Evident Proposition / Michael W. Hickson -- What Le Clerc Said Concerning the Trinity and the Pyrrhonian Abbé / Michael W. Hickson -- Discussion of Le Clerc’s Remarks on the Three Propositions to Which Bayle Reduced His Own Position / Michael W. Hickson -- Retortion of Le Clerc’s Accusations / Michael W. Hickson -- That Le Clerc Delivers Religion, as Well as Himself, Hands and Feet Bound, over to the Atheists / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc Had Recourse to the Same Refuge as Bayle; An Addition to What He Said Concerning the Trinity / Michael W. Hickson -- Plastic Natures / Michael W. Hickson -- Several Remarks on Origenism / Michael W. Hickson -- What is the Nature of Tolerance According to Le Clerc? / Michael W. Hickson -- General Reflections on the Proceedings of Le Clerc against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot is an Arminian Neophyte / Michael W. Hickson -- First of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacked Bayle’s Doctrine without Admitting That He Knew That It was the Same as That of the Reformed, and He Pretended to Believe That It was Very Different / Michael W. Hickson -- Second of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Believes That the Same Doctrine is Innocent or Blameworthy Depending on the Intentions of Those Who Teach It / Michael W. Hickson -- Third of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Claims That Bayle Removes Every Sort of Freedom from Man / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether There is Something That Could Have Misled Jaquelot. Two Characteristics of Bayle’s Dictionary / Michael W. Hickson -- Fourth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacks Bayle on the Agreement of Faith and Reason, yet in the End He Says the Same Thing as Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Three Differences That Jaquelot Found between His and Bayle’s Doctrines / Michael W. Hickson -- Reflection on the Phrases ‘Abandoning Reason’ and ‘being Contrary to Reason’ / Michael W. Hickson -- That It Appears by the State of the Question Given by Bayle That There is No Real Dispute between Him and Jaquelot / Michael W. Hickson -- Fifth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Sought a Compromise That Nobook-body Needed / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of Jaquelot’s Reply to the Difficulties Concerning the Origin of Evil. He Abandons Common Notions / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot Should Have Focused on the Question of Whether Bayle Believes That God is the Author of Sin / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Five Principles That Jaquelot Substituted for the Common Notions That He Rejected / Michael W. Hickson. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910798325203321 |
|
Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, >
|
||
| Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson
| Pierre Bayle dialogues of Maximus and Themistius / / translated, edited, and introduced by Michael W. Hickson |
| Autore | Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, > |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (446 pages) |
| Disciplina | 231/.8 |
| Collana |
Brill's Studies in Intellectual History
Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History |
| Soggetto topico |
Calvinism
Theodicy Good and evil |
| ISBN | 90-04-32143-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Front Matter / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Afterword / Michael W. Hickson -- Notes on the Text / Michael W. Hickson -- Bibliography / Michael W. Hickson -- Foreword / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- An Examination of Le Clerc’s Case against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Four Serious Problems with Le Clerc’s Objection That was Based on Several Inferences He Drew from Bayle’s Opinion / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc’s Zeal was Delayed / Michael W. Hickson -- Le Clerc’s Response to the Accusation of Socinianism / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether It is Possible to Reject an Evident Proposition / Michael W. Hickson -- What Le Clerc Said Concerning the Trinity and the Pyrrhonian Abbé / Michael W. Hickson -- Discussion of Le Clerc’s Remarks on the Three Propositions to Which Bayle Reduced His Own Position / Michael W. Hickson -- Retortion of Le Clerc’s Accusations / Michael W. Hickson -- That Le Clerc Delivers Religion, as Well as Himself, Hands and Feet Bound, over to the Atheists / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Le Clerc Had Recourse to the Same Refuge as Bayle; An Addition to What He Said Concerning the Trinity / Michael W. Hickson -- Plastic Natures / Michael W. Hickson -- Several Remarks on Origenism / Michael W. Hickson -- What is the Nature of Tolerance According to Le Clerc? / Michael W. Hickson -- General Reflections on the Proceedings of Le Clerc against Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Introduction / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot is an Arminian Neophyte / Michael W. Hickson -- First of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacked Bayle’s Doctrine without Admitting That He Knew That It was the Same as That of the Reformed, and He Pretended to Believe That It was Very Different / Michael W. Hickson -- Second of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Believes That the Same Doctrine is Innocent or Blameworthy Depending on the Intentions of Those Who Teach It / Michael W. Hickson -- Third of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Claims That Bayle Removes Every Sort of Freedom from Man / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether There is Something That Could Have Misled Jaquelot. Two Characteristics of Bayle’s Dictionary / Michael W. Hickson -- Fourth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Attacks Bayle on the Agreement of Faith and Reason, yet in the End He Says the Same Thing as Bayle / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Three Differences That Jaquelot Found between His and Bayle’s Doctrines / Michael W. Hickson -- Reflection on the Phrases ‘Abandoning Reason’ and ‘being Contrary to Reason’ / Michael W. Hickson -- That It Appears by the State of the Question Given by Bayle That There is No Real Dispute between Him and Jaquelot / Michael W. Hickson -- Fifth of Jaquelot’s Faults: He Sought a Compromise That Nobook-body Needed / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of Jaquelot’s Reply to the Difficulties Concerning the Origin of Evil. He Abandons Common Notions / Michael W. Hickson -- Whether Jaquelot Should Have Focused on the Question of Whether Bayle Believes That God is the Author of Sin / Michael W. Hickson -- Examination of the Five Principles That Jaquelot Substituted for the Common Notions That He Rejected / Michael W. Hickson. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910824345503321 |
|
Bayle Pierre <1647-1706, >
|
||
| Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||