Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Energy efficiency finance : : assessing the impact of IFC's China Utility-Based Energy Efficiency Finance Program
| Energy efficiency finance : : assessing the impact of IFC's China Utility-Based Energy Efficiency Finance Program |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C. : , : World Bank, , c2010 |
| Descrizione fisica | xiv, 75 pages : illustrations ; ; 28 cm |
| Disciplina | 336 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | HatashimaHiroyuki |
| Collana | IEG study series |
| Soggetto topico |
Energy conservation - China
Energy policy - China |
| ISBN |
1-282-72575-0
9786612725753 0-8213-8452-X |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Executive Summary; Chairman's Summary: Subcommittee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); Chapter 1. Climate Change and Financing Energy Efficiency; Chapter 2. The China Utility-Based Energy Efficiency Finance Program; Chapter 3. CHUEE's Impacts; Chapter 4. Lessons and Recommendations; Appendix A: Chinese Government Policy to Support Energy Efficiency; Appendix B: CHUEE Funding Sources; Appendix C: Summary of Surveys Conducted for the Evaluation; Appendix D: Bank Survey
Appendix E: Energy Management Company Survey Appendix F: Cement Company Survey; Appendix G: CHUEE Cost Benefit Analysis; Appendix H: Major Climate Change Projects in China; End notes; Bibliography; Back cover |
| Altri titoli varianti | Assessing the impact of IFC's China Utility-Based Energy Efficiency Finance Program |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910791479003321 |
| Washington, D.C. : , : World Bank, , c2010 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 [[electronic resource] ] : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group
| Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 [[electronic resource] ] : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C., : International Finance Corp., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (117 p.) |
| Disciplina |
332.1/532
338.91091724 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
CrabtreeDan
HatashimaHiroyuki |
| Soggetto topico | Economic development projects - Evaluation |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-281-11324-7
9786611113247 0-8213-7265-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Contents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Avant-propos; Prólogo; Executive Summary; Résumé analytique; Resumen; IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC; Chairperson's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); 1 Development Results of IFC-Supported Projects, 1996-2006; Figure 1.1 IFC Has Increased Its Private Investment Operations Sixfold since 1991; Table 1.1 IFC Is More Concentrated Than Other Private Capital in Frontier Countries; Box 1.1 IEG Independently Rates the Development and Investment Performance of IFC Operations
Box 1.2 Examples of Successful and Less Successful IFC Projects Figure 1.2 IFC Operations Can Help Reduce Poverty through a Chain of Events; Table 1.2 Most IFC-Supported Projects Achieved High Development Ratings, 1996-2006; Figure 1.3 Trends in Project Development Performance, 1996-2006; Figure 1.4 Projects with More High-Risk Factors Achieve Lower Development Ratings; Figure 1.5 Reduced Business Climate Risk Implies Higher Development Ratings in 2007; Figure 1.6 IFC-Supported Projects Show No Trade-off between Development Results and IFC Investment Returns Table 1.3 More Loan Than Equity Operations Achieved High Investment Ratings Box 1.3 IFC Is Deepening Its Development Results Measurement but Methodological Challenges Remain; Box 1.4 IFC and World Bank Development Results Are Generally Not Comparable; Figure 1.7 EBRD and IFC Achieved Similar Development Ratings on One Subindicator; 2 Lessons from 10 Years of Private Sector Development Evaluation; Figure 2.1 Much Riskier Business Climates in Africa, with Some Improvement since 2003; Figure 2.2 Much Lower Private Investment in Africa Than Elsewhere Table 2.1 IFC Success Rates Are Significantly Better Where Country Business Climate Risk Is Improving, or Not Deteriorating Figure 2.3 IFC Development Ratings Varied Considerably by Industry Department; Box 2.1 Examples of IFC Transport Investments in Brazil; Table 2.2 IFC Project Development Results Improve Significantly with the Presence of a High-Quality Sponsor; Table 2.3 Product Market Risk Has a Strong Influence on IFC Project Development Results; Box 2.2 IEG Evaluates IFC Work Quality across Three Underlying Indicators Box 2.3 IFC Faced Considerable Challenges Pursuing Sustainable PSD in Africa Figure 2.4 Supervision Quality Has Improved since 2001, Reflecting Several Quality Enhancement Steps; Table 2.4 Good Quality Supervision Cannot Compensate Fully for Weak Appraisal Quality; Figure 2.5 IFC Is Increasing Its Provision of Local Currency Financing; Table 2.5 Evaluation Findings Have Provided a Basis for Better IFC Results in Three Main Areas; 3 Strategic Implications for IFC; Figure 3.1 Many Nonfrontier Countries Are as Lacking in Banking Capacity as Frontier Countries Table 3.1 IFC's Financial Sector Development Success Rates Are Lower Where Banking Capacity Is Weak |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910451943603321 |
| Washington, D.C., : International Finance Corp., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 : : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group
| Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 : : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C. : , : International Finance Corp., , 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | xlii, 72 pages : illustrations ; ; 28 cm |
| Disciplina | 332.1/532 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
CrabtreeDan
HatashimaHiroyuki |
| Soggetto topico | Economic development projects - Evaluation |
| ISBN |
1-281-11324-7
9786611113247 0-8213-7265-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Contents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Avant-propos; Prólogo; Executive Summary; Résumé analytique; Resumen; IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC; Chairperson's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); 1 Development Results of IFC-Supported Projects, 1996-2006; Figure 1.1 IFC Has Increased Its Private Investment Operations Sixfold since 1991; Table 1.1 IFC Is More Concentrated Than Other Private Capital in Frontier Countries; Box 1.1 IEG Independently Rates the Development and Investment Performance of IFC Operations
Box 1.2 Examples of Successful and Less Successful IFC Projects Figure 1.2 IFC Operations Can Help Reduce Poverty through a Chain of Events; Table 1.2 Most IFC-Supported Projects Achieved High Development Ratings, 1996-2006; Figure 1.3 Trends in Project Development Performance, 1996-2006; Figure 1.4 Projects with More High-Risk Factors Achieve Lower Development Ratings; Figure 1.5 Reduced Business Climate Risk Implies Higher Development Ratings in 2007; Figure 1.6 IFC-Supported Projects Show No Trade-off between Development Results and IFC Investment Returns Table 1.3 More Loan Than Equity Operations Achieved High Investment Ratings Box 1.3 IFC Is Deepening Its Development Results Measurement but Methodological Challenges Remain; Box 1.4 IFC and World Bank Development Results Are Generally Not Comparable; Figure 1.7 EBRD and IFC Achieved Similar Development Ratings on One Subindicator; 2 Lessons from 10 Years of Private Sector Development Evaluation; Figure 2.1 Much Riskier Business Climates in Africa, with Some Improvement since 2003; Figure 2.2 Much Lower Private Investment in Africa Than Elsewhere Table 2.1 IFC Success Rates Are Significantly Better Where Country Business Climate Risk Is Improving, or Not Deteriorating Figure 2.3 IFC Development Ratings Varied Considerably by Industry Department; Box 2.1 Examples of IFC Transport Investments in Brazil; Table 2.2 IFC Project Development Results Improve Significantly with the Presence of a High-Quality Sponsor; Table 2.3 Product Market Risk Has a Strong Influence on IFC Project Development Results; Box 2.2 IEG Evaluates IFC Work Quality across Three Underlying Indicators Box 2.3 IFC Faced Considerable Challenges Pursuing Sustainable PSD in Africa Figure 2.4 Supervision Quality Has Improved since 2001, Reflecting Several Quality Enhancement Steps; Table 2.4 Good Quality Supervision Cannot Compensate Fully for Weak Appraisal Quality; Figure 2.5 IFC Is Increasing Its Provision of Local Currency Financing; Table 2.5 Evaluation Findings Have Provided a Basis for Better IFC Results in Three Main Areas; 3 Strategic Implications for IFC; Figure 3.1 Many Nonfrontier Countries Are as Lacking in Banking Capacity as Frontier Countries Table 3.1 IFC's Financial Sector Development Success Rates Are Lower Where Banking Capacity Is Weak |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910778264603321 |
| Washington, D.C. : , : International Finance Corp., , 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group
| Independent evaluation of IFC's development results 2007 : lessons and implications from 10 years of experience / / Independent Evaluation Group |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Washington, D.C., : International Finance Corp., 2007 |
| Descrizione fisica | xlii, 72 pages : illustrations ; ; 28 cm |
| Disciplina | 332.1/532 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
CrabtreeDan
HatashimaHiroyuki |
| Soggetto topico | Economic development projects - Evaluation |
| ISBN |
1-281-11324-7
9786611113247 0-8213-7265-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Contents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Avant-propos; Prólogo; Executive Summary; Résumé analytique; Resumen; IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC; Chairperson's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); 1 Development Results of IFC-Supported Projects, 1996-2006; Figure 1.1 IFC Has Increased Its Private Investment Operations Sixfold since 1991; Table 1.1 IFC Is More Concentrated Than Other Private Capital in Frontier Countries; Box 1.1 IEG Independently Rates the Development and Investment Performance of IFC Operations
Box 1.2 Examples of Successful and Less Successful IFC Projects Figure 1.2 IFC Operations Can Help Reduce Poverty through a Chain of Events; Table 1.2 Most IFC-Supported Projects Achieved High Development Ratings, 1996-2006; Figure 1.3 Trends in Project Development Performance, 1996-2006; Figure 1.4 Projects with More High-Risk Factors Achieve Lower Development Ratings; Figure 1.5 Reduced Business Climate Risk Implies Higher Development Ratings in 2007; Figure 1.6 IFC-Supported Projects Show No Trade-off between Development Results and IFC Investment Returns Table 1.3 More Loan Than Equity Operations Achieved High Investment Ratings Box 1.3 IFC Is Deepening Its Development Results Measurement but Methodological Challenges Remain; Box 1.4 IFC and World Bank Development Results Are Generally Not Comparable; Figure 1.7 EBRD and IFC Achieved Similar Development Ratings on One Subindicator; 2 Lessons from 10 Years of Private Sector Development Evaluation; Figure 2.1 Much Riskier Business Climates in Africa, with Some Improvement since 2003; Figure 2.2 Much Lower Private Investment in Africa Than Elsewhere Table 2.1 IFC Success Rates Are Significantly Better Where Country Business Climate Risk Is Improving, or Not Deteriorating Figure 2.3 IFC Development Ratings Varied Considerably by Industry Department; Box 2.1 Examples of IFC Transport Investments in Brazil; Table 2.2 IFC Project Development Results Improve Significantly with the Presence of a High-Quality Sponsor; Table 2.3 Product Market Risk Has a Strong Influence on IFC Project Development Results; Box 2.2 IEG Evaluates IFC Work Quality across Three Underlying Indicators Box 2.3 IFC Faced Considerable Challenges Pursuing Sustainable PSD in Africa Figure 2.4 Supervision Quality Has Improved since 2001, Reflecting Several Quality Enhancement Steps; Table 2.4 Good Quality Supervision Cannot Compensate Fully for Weak Appraisal Quality; Figure 2.5 IFC Is Increasing Its Provision of Local Currency Financing; Table 2.5 Evaluation Findings Have Provided a Basis for Better IFC Results in Three Main Areas; 3 Strategic Implications for IFC; Figure 3.1 Many Nonfrontier Countries Are as Lacking in Banking Capacity as Frontier Countries Table 3.1 IFC's Financial Sector Development Success Rates Are Lower Where Banking Capacity Is Weak |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910807222703321 |
| Washington, D.C., : International Finance Corp., 2007 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||