Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos
| The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos |
| Autore | Gerangelos Peter A. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (360 p.) |
| Disciplina | 320.404 |
| Soggetto topico |
Separation of powers
Judicial independence Judicial process |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6042-6
1-282-30489-5 9786612304897 1-84731-500-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Introduction -- Legislative interference in the pending case scenario : the foundation of principle and the Australian position -- Legislative interference with judicial functions : the jurisprudence of the United States, evaluation of principle, and towards resolution -- The separation of powers and final judgments : defining the principle limiting legislative revision of final judgments -- Qualifications to the inviolability of final judgments and final summation -- Protections afforded decisional independence in jurisdictions without an entrenched separation of powers
1 Introduction -- I. The Relevant Scenarios -- II. Definitional Difficulties -- III. The Original Legal Entrenchment of the Doctrine and -- the Underlying Rationale -- IV. The Possibility of General Principles and -- Interpretational Methodology -- V. The Purposive Nature of The Separation of Powers -- Doctrine -- VI. The Problem of Definition and the Formalist Approach -- VII. Core Branch Functions? -- 2 Legislative Interference in the Pending Case Scenario: The -- Foundation of Principle and the Australian Position -- I. Introduction -- II. The Australian Constitutional Position and the Early -- Australian Constitutional Scholars -- III. Early Development of Principle by the High Court -- IV. The Foundation of a Discrete Set of Principles -- Governing the Pending Case Scenario: Liyanage v R -- V. Consolidation of Principle Post-Liyanage -- VI. The Direction Rule at the Crossroads: Nicholas v The -- Queen -- VII. The Uncertain Status of the Direction Principle in -- Australia -- 3 Legislative Interference with Judicial Functions: The -- Jurisprudence of the United States, Evaluation of Principle, and -- Towards Resolution -- I. Introduction -- II. The Emergence of the Changed Law Rule and the -- Direction Principle in the United States -- III. Klein and Its Uncertain Meaning -- IV. Hart's Thesis and the United States Foundation of the -- Direction Principle -- V. The Decline of the Direction Rule: The Robertson Case -- VI. Robertson's Uncertain Legacy: Plaut v Spendthrift Farm Inc -- VII. Klein Qualified, Overruled or Misinterpreted? Miller v -- French -- VIII. The Schiavo Litigation -- IX. Further Confirmation of the Direction Principle -- X. General Conclusions on the Separation of Powers and -- the Pending Case Scenario -- XI. Towards a Resolution -- XII. A Reformulated Direction Principle -- XIII. Speculative Propositions -- XIV. Conclusion -- 4 The Separation of Powers and Final Judgments: Defining the -- Principle Limiting Legislative Revision of Final Judgments -- I. Introduction and Definition of Final Judgment -- II. Reflections on Finality Where the Separation Doctrine -- is Not Entrenched -- III. A Middle Case: India -- IV. Early Australian Commentary on the Constitutional -- Protection of Final Judgments -- V. The Current Australian Position -- VI. Qualifications -- VII. A Reinforcement of Australian Jurisprudence: The -- Irish Position on Final Judgments -- VIII. The United States Supreme Court and Final Judgments -- IX. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification -- X. The Development and Consolidation of Principle by -- the United States Supreme Court -- XI. The Inviolability Principle Tested: Miller v French -- XII. Conclusion -- 5 Qualifications to the Inviolability of Final Judgments and -- Final Summation -- I. Introduction -- II. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification, the Regulation of -- Public Rights and 'Conditional' Final Judgments -- III. The Waiver Qualification -- IV. Conclusions on the Final Case Scenario -- 6 Protections Afforded Decisional Independence in Jurisdictions -- without an Entrenched Separation of Powers -- I. Introduction -- II. The United Kingdom and the Separation of Powers -- III. The European Convention on Human Rights -- IV. The United Kingdom, the ECHR and the Human -- Rights Act 1998. -- V. Canons of Statutory Intepretation -- 7 Conclusion |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910455434103321 |
Gerangelos Peter A.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos
| The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos |
| Autore | Gerangelos Peter A. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (360 p.) |
| Disciplina | 320.404 |
| Soggetto topico |
Separation of powers
Judicial independence Judicial process |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6042-6
1-282-30489-5 9786612304897 1-84731-500-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Introduction -- Legislative interference in the pending case scenario : the foundation of principle and the Australian position -- Legislative interference with judicial functions : the jurisprudence of the United States, evaluation of principle, and towards resolution -- The separation of powers and final judgments : defining the principle limiting legislative revision of final judgments -- Qualifications to the inviolability of final judgments and final summation -- Protections afforded decisional independence in jurisdictions without an entrenched separation of powers
1 Introduction -- I. The Relevant Scenarios -- II. Definitional Difficulties -- III. The Original Legal Entrenchment of the Doctrine and -- the Underlying Rationale -- IV. The Possibility of General Principles and -- Interpretational Methodology -- V. The Purposive Nature of The Separation of Powers -- Doctrine -- VI. The Problem of Definition and the Formalist Approach -- VII. Core Branch Functions? -- 2 Legislative Interference in the Pending Case Scenario: The -- Foundation of Principle and the Australian Position -- I. Introduction -- II. The Australian Constitutional Position and the Early -- Australian Constitutional Scholars -- III. Early Development of Principle by the High Court -- IV. The Foundation of a Discrete Set of Principles -- Governing the Pending Case Scenario: Liyanage v R -- V. Consolidation of Principle Post-Liyanage -- VI. The Direction Rule at the Crossroads: Nicholas v The -- Queen -- VII. The Uncertain Status of the Direction Principle in -- Australia -- 3 Legislative Interference with Judicial Functions: The -- Jurisprudence of the United States, Evaluation of Principle, and -- Towards Resolution -- I. Introduction -- II. The Emergence of the Changed Law Rule and the -- Direction Principle in the United States -- III. Klein and Its Uncertain Meaning -- IV. Hart's Thesis and the United States Foundation of the -- Direction Principle -- V. The Decline of the Direction Rule: The Robertson Case -- VI. Robertson's Uncertain Legacy: Plaut v Spendthrift Farm Inc -- VII. Klein Qualified, Overruled or Misinterpreted? Miller v -- French -- VIII. The Schiavo Litigation -- IX. Further Confirmation of the Direction Principle -- X. General Conclusions on the Separation of Powers and -- the Pending Case Scenario -- XI. Towards a Resolution -- XII. A Reformulated Direction Principle -- XIII. Speculative Propositions -- XIV. Conclusion -- 4 The Separation of Powers and Final Judgments: Defining the -- Principle Limiting Legislative Revision of Final Judgments -- I. Introduction and Definition of Final Judgment -- II. Reflections on Finality Where the Separation Doctrine -- is Not Entrenched -- III. A Middle Case: India -- IV. Early Australian Commentary on the Constitutional -- Protection of Final Judgments -- V. The Current Australian Position -- VI. Qualifications -- VII. A Reinforcement of Australian Jurisprudence: The -- Irish Position on Final Judgments -- VIII. The United States Supreme Court and Final Judgments -- IX. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification -- X. The Development and Consolidation of Principle by -- the United States Supreme Court -- XI. The Inviolability Principle Tested: Miller v French -- XII. Conclusion -- 5 Qualifications to the Inviolability of Final Judgments and -- Final Summation -- I. Introduction -- II. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification, the Regulation of -- Public Rights and 'Conditional' Final Judgments -- III. The Waiver Qualification -- IV. Conclusions on the Final Case Scenario -- 6 Protections Afforded Decisional Independence in Jurisdictions -- without an Entrenched Separation of Powers -- I. Introduction -- II. The United Kingdom and the Separation of Powers -- III. The European Convention on Human Rights -- IV. The United Kingdom, the ECHR and the Human -- Rights Act 1998. -- V. Canons of Statutory Intepretation -- 7 Conclusion |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910778486803321 |
|
Gerangelos Peter A.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos
| The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : constitutional principles and limitations / Peter A. Gerangelos |
| Autore | Gerangelos Peter A. |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (360 p.) |
| Disciplina | 320.404 |
| Soggetto topico |
Separation of powers
Judicial independence Judicial process |
| ISBN |
1-4725-6042-6
1-282-30489-5 9786612304897 1-84731-500-3 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Introduction -- Legislative interference in the pending case scenario : the foundation of principle and the Australian position -- Legislative interference with judicial functions : the jurisprudence of the United States, evaluation of principle, and towards resolution -- The separation of powers and final judgments : defining the principle limiting legislative revision of final judgments -- Qualifications to the inviolability of final judgments and final summation -- Protections afforded decisional independence in jurisdictions without an entrenched separation of powers
1 Introduction -- I. The Relevant Scenarios -- II. Definitional Difficulties -- III. The Original Legal Entrenchment of the Doctrine and -- the Underlying Rationale -- IV. The Possibility of General Principles and -- Interpretational Methodology -- V. The Purposive Nature of The Separation of Powers -- Doctrine -- VI. The Problem of Definition and the Formalist Approach -- VII. Core Branch Functions? -- 2 Legislative Interference in the Pending Case Scenario: The -- Foundation of Principle and the Australian Position -- I. Introduction -- II. The Australian Constitutional Position and the Early -- Australian Constitutional Scholars -- III. Early Development of Principle by the High Court -- IV. The Foundation of a Discrete Set of Principles -- Governing the Pending Case Scenario: Liyanage v R -- V. Consolidation of Principle Post-Liyanage -- VI. The Direction Rule at the Crossroads: Nicholas v The -- Queen -- VII. The Uncertain Status of the Direction Principle in -- Australia -- 3 Legislative Interference with Judicial Functions: The -- Jurisprudence of the United States, Evaluation of Principle, and -- Towards Resolution -- I. Introduction -- II. The Emergence of the Changed Law Rule and the -- Direction Principle in the United States -- III. Klein and Its Uncertain Meaning -- IV. Hart's Thesis and the United States Foundation of the -- Direction Principle -- V. The Decline of the Direction Rule: The Robertson Case -- VI. Robertson's Uncertain Legacy: Plaut v Spendthrift Farm Inc -- VII. Klein Qualified, Overruled or Misinterpreted? Miller v -- French -- VIII. The Schiavo Litigation -- IX. Further Confirmation of the Direction Principle -- X. General Conclusions on the Separation of Powers and -- the Pending Case Scenario -- XI. Towards a Resolution -- XII. A Reformulated Direction Principle -- XIII. Speculative Propositions -- XIV. Conclusion -- 4 The Separation of Powers and Final Judgments: Defining the -- Principle Limiting Legislative Revision of Final Judgments -- I. Introduction and Definition of Final Judgment -- II. Reflections on Finality Where the Separation Doctrine -- is Not Entrenched -- III. A Middle Case: India -- IV. Early Australian Commentary on the Constitutional -- Protection of Final Judgments -- V. The Current Australian Position -- VI. Qualifications -- VII. A Reinforcement of Australian Jurisprudence: The -- Irish Position on Final Judgments -- VIII. The United States Supreme Court and Final Judgments -- IX. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification -- X. The Development and Consolidation of Principle by -- the United States Supreme Court -- XI. The Inviolability Principle Tested: Miller v French -- XII. Conclusion -- 5 Qualifications to the Inviolability of Final Judgments and -- Final Summation -- I. Introduction -- II. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification, the Regulation of -- Public Rights and 'Conditional' Final Judgments -- III. The Waiver Qualification -- IV. Conclusions on the Final Case Scenario -- 6 Protections Afforded Decisional Independence in Jurisdictions -- without an Entrenched Separation of Powers -- I. Introduction -- II. The United Kingdom and the Separation of Powers -- III. The European Convention on Human Rights -- IV. The United Kingdom, the ECHR and the Human -- Rights Act 1998. -- V. Canons of Statutory Intepretation -- 7 Conclusion |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910807276503321 |
|
Gerangelos Peter A.
|
||
| Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2009 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||