Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

The Evaluators’ Eye : Impact Assessment and Academic Peer Review / / by Gemma Derrick



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Derrick Gemma Visualizza persona
Titolo: The Evaluators’ Eye : Impact Assessment and Academic Peer Review / / by Gemma Derrick Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2018
Edizione: 1st ed. 2018.
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (XV, 230 p. 3 illus., 1 illus. in color.)
Disciplina: 378
Soggetto topico: Higher education
Assessment
Educational policy
Education and state
School management and organization
School administration
Teaching
Education—Research
Higher Education
Assessment, Testing and Evaluation
Educational Policy and Politics
Administration, Organization and Leadership
Teaching and Teacher Education
Research Methods in Education
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: Chapter 1. Impact from the Evaluator's Eye -- Chapter 2. Peer Review of Impact: Could it Work? -- Chapter 3. Evaluation Mechanics -- Chapter 4. Introducing Impact to the Evaluators -- Chapter 5. Peers, Experts and Impact -- Chapter 6. Risking Groupthink in Impact Assessment -- Chapter 7. Working Smarter with Multiple Impacts and One Eye.
Sommario/riassunto: This book offers an empirical analysis of how academic peer review panels mediate the traditionally non-academic criterion of societal impact. The UK’s 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) for the first time included an “Impact” criterion that considered how research had influenced society, beyond academia.  Using a series of interviews with REF2014 Main Panel A evaluators, the book explores how a dominant definition of Impact was constructed within panels and how this led to the development of strategies around valuing it as an ambiguous object.  By doing so, Derrick brings a unique perspective to Impact that is currently overlooked in the dominant Impact evaluation discourse. Through examining the evaluation procedure as a dynamic process it is argued that the best models, strategies and insights for Impact evaluation are those constructed in practice, within peer review groups.  By exploring the legitimacy of peer review as a tool to assess the societal impact of research, Derrick states that the future for Impact evaluation is not to seek alternative tools where peer review seemingly fails, but instead to highlight ways in which peer review panels can work smarter. The book will be essential reading for students, academics and policy-makers working in Education, as well as researchers interested in peer review processes and the research evaluation frameworks and audit exercises globally.
Titolo autorizzato: The Evaluators’ Eye  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 3-319-63627-8
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910299543003321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilitĂ  qui