Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman
| Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman |
| Edizione | [1st ed. 2015.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2015 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (230 p.) |
| Disciplina | 345.075 |
| Collana | Law and Philosophy Library |
| Soggetto topico |
Law—Philosophy
Law Political science Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History Philosophy of Law |
| ISBN | 3-319-16148-2 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Introduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony – A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of ‘insulting’; Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions; Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes.- Index. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910483249703321 |
| Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2015 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Legal argumentation theory : cross-disciplinary perspectives / / Christian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris, editors
| Legal argumentation theory : cross-disciplinary perspectives / / Christian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris, editors |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | New York, : Springer, 2013 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (238 p.) |
| Disciplina | 340.11 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
DahlmanChristian
FeterisEveline |
| Collana |
Law and Philosophy Library
Law and philosophy library |
| Soggetto topico |
Law - Methodology
Logic Reasoning Trial practice |
| ISBN |
1-283-63395-7
9786613946409 94-007-4670-9 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto | Table of Contents -- Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris -- Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell -- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante -- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer -- Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg -- The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis -- Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”; Eveline Feteris -- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal -- Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson -- Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage -- The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak -- Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi -- Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann -- Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet -- Index. |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910438358403321 |
| New York, : Springer, 2013 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||