top

  Info

  • Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.

  Info

  • Utilizzare questo link per rimuovere la selezione effettuata.
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman
Edizione [1st ed. 2015.]
Pubbl/distr/stampa Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2015
Descrizione fisica 1 online resource (230 p.)
Disciplina 345.075
Collana Law and Philosophy Library
Soggetto topico Law—Philosophy
Law
Political science
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
Philosophy of Law
ISBN 3-319-16148-2
Formato Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione eng
Nota di contenuto Introduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony – A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and  Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of ‘insulting’;  Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest;  Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions;  Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes.- Index.
Record Nr. UNINA-9910483249703321
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2015
Materiale a stampa
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui
Democratizing Constitutional Law : Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes
Democratizing Constitutional Law : Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism / / edited by Thomas Bustamante, Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes
Edizione [1st ed. 2016.]
Pubbl/distr/stampa Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2016
Descrizione fisica 1 online resource (330 p.)
Disciplina 342.001
Collana Law and Philosophy Library
Soggetto topico Law—Philosophy
Law
Political philosophy
Political theory
Constitutional law
Political science
Private international law
Conflict of laws
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
Political Philosophy
Political Theory
Constitutional Law
Philosophy of Law
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
ISBN 3-319-28371-5
Formato Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione eng
Nota di contenuto I Challenging and Defending Judicial Review -- 1. Randomized Judicial Review; Andrei Marmor -- 2. On the Difficulty to Ground the Authority of Constitutional Courts: Can Strong Judicial Review be Morally Justified?; Thomas Bustamante -- 3. The Reasons without Vote: The Representative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts; Luís Roberto Barroso -- II Constitutional Dialogues and Constitutional Deliberation -- 4. Decoupling Judicial Review From Judicial Supremacy; Stephen Gardbaum -- 5. Scope and limits of dialogic constitutionalism; Roberto Gargarella -- 6. A Defence of a Broader Sense of Constitutional Dialogues based on Jeremy Waldron's Criticism on Judicial Review; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes -- III Institutional Alternatives for Constitutional Changes -- 7. New Institutional Mechanisms for Making Constitutional Law; Mark Tushnet -- 8. Democratic Constitutional Change: Assessing Institutional Possibilities; Christopher Zurn -- 9. The Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Changes in Colombia: a Tension between Majoritatian and Constitutional Democracy; Gonzalo Ramírez Cleves -- IV Constitutional Promises and Democratic Participation -- 10. Is there such thing as a radical constitution?; Vera Karam de Chueiri -- 11. Judicial reference to community values - A pointer towards constitutional juries?; Eric Ghosh -- V Legal Theory and Constitutional Interpretation -- 12. Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution; Wil Waluchow and Katharina Stevens -- 13. On how law is not like chess – Dworkin and the theory of conceptual types; Ronaldo Porto Macedo Júnior. .
Record Nr. UNINA-9910255201703321
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2016
Materiale a stampa
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui