Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 [[electronic resource] ] : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer
| Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 [[electronic resource] ] : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (402 p.) |
| Disciplina | 440 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BernsJanine
JacobsHaike <1961-> ScheerTobias <1968-> |
| Collana | Romance languages and linguistic theory (RLLT) |
| Soggetto topico | Romance languages |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-283-32900-X
9786613329004 90-272-8218-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Expressing contrast in Romanian; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Iar and the Romanian coordination system in a Romance perspective; 1.2 An overview of the uses of iar; 2. Constraints on iar; 2.1 Information Structure; 2.2 Syntax; 3. Double contrastiveness; 3.1 Double contrastiveness and quantification; 3.2 Predicate negation: Comparison with dar and si; 3.3 A blocking analysis of Romanian connectives; 3.4 Taking stock; 4. Conclusion; References; When the benefit is on the fringe
1. Introduction2. Arguments against a low applicative; 2.1 Pylkkänen 2008; 2.2 Challenges to the received applicative analysis; 3. French non-core datives; 3.1 Low applicative properties; 3.2 High applicative properties; 3.3 Summary; 4. Coreferential Dative Constructions; 5. Benefactive vs. Coreferential non-core datives; 6. Syntactic analysis; 6.1 The syntactic difference between BDs and CDs; 6.2 Embedding under causative-faire; 7. Conclusion; References; Degree fronting in Québec French and the syntactic structure of degree quantifier DPS; 1. Introduction; 2. Degree Fronting and IAD 2.1 Degree Fronting in English2.2 Intensification at a Distance; 3. A movement analysis of IAD?; 3.1 Matushansky (2002); 3.2 Arguments against movement: IAD in Quebec French; 3.3 Degree quantifiers within DP; 4. Semantic variation and analysis; 4.1 Dialectal variation; 4.2 Towards a Compositional Semantics for IAD; 5. Conclusion; References; On sentence-internal le même ('the same') in French and Pluractionality; 1. Introduction; 2. The problem of definiteness: Le meme as a complex determiner; 2.1 Presuppositions; 2.2 Specificity; 2.3 DP-internal distribution of même 3. The problem of compositionality: Le meme as an existential quantifier3.1 Distributivity; 3.2 Le même and syntactic movement; 3.2.1 Quantifier raising; 3.2.2 Scope phenomena; 4. The event hypothesis; 5. Relation to pluractionality; 6. Conclusion; References; Topic prominence is not a factor of variation between Brazilian and European Portuguese; 1. Introduction; 2. BP as a discourse oriented language; 3. BP's topic-prominent properties in EP; 4. The locus of variation; 5. Conclusions; References; When dialectology studies contribute to lexical semantics and to etymology 1. Why is Dialectology able to bring such a fundamental contribution to Etymology and to the diachronic study of the lexicon?2. Is the classical approach in Etymology not a lexical reconstruction?; 3. What does the etymological approach consist in when attested Latin data lack?; Example 1 fr. câliner; Example 2 fr. petit ; occ. petito; Example 3 fr. chat-huant; Example 4 fr. drôle; occ.: drole; 4. Other possibility: The Latin source exists but cannot be located; Example 5 the mysterious name of a the swift in the Friuli, Italy] Example 6 the name of the Mistle Thrush in a part of the Occitan area |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910457715203321 |
| Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 [[electronic resource] ] : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer
| Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 [[electronic resource] ] : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (402 p.) |
| Disciplina | 440 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BernsJanine
JacobsHaike <1961-> ScheerTobias <1968-> |
| Collana | Romance languages and linguistic theory (RLLT) |
| Soggetto topico | Romance languages |
| ISBN |
1-283-32900-X
9786613329004 90-272-8218-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Expressing contrast in Romanian; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Iar and the Romanian coordination system in a Romance perspective; 1.2 An overview of the uses of iar; 2. Constraints on iar; 2.1 Information Structure; 2.2 Syntax; 3. Double contrastiveness; 3.1 Double contrastiveness and quantification; 3.2 Predicate negation: Comparison with dar and si; 3.3 A blocking analysis of Romanian connectives; 3.4 Taking stock; 4. Conclusion; References; When the benefit is on the fringe
1. Introduction2. Arguments against a low applicative; 2.1 Pylkkänen 2008; 2.2 Challenges to the received applicative analysis; 3. French non-core datives; 3.1 Low applicative properties; 3.2 High applicative properties; 3.3 Summary; 4. Coreferential Dative Constructions; 5. Benefactive vs. Coreferential non-core datives; 6. Syntactic analysis; 6.1 The syntactic difference between BDs and CDs; 6.2 Embedding under causative-faire; 7. Conclusion; References; Degree fronting in Québec French and the syntactic structure of degree quantifier DPS; 1. Introduction; 2. Degree Fronting and IAD 2.1 Degree Fronting in English2.2 Intensification at a Distance; 3. A movement analysis of IAD?; 3.1 Matushansky (2002); 3.2 Arguments against movement: IAD in Quebec French; 3.3 Degree quantifiers within DP; 4. Semantic variation and analysis; 4.1 Dialectal variation; 4.2 Towards a Compositional Semantics for IAD; 5. Conclusion; References; On sentence-internal le même ('the same') in French and Pluractionality; 1. Introduction; 2. The problem of definiteness: Le meme as a complex determiner; 2.1 Presuppositions; 2.2 Specificity; 2.3 DP-internal distribution of même 3. The problem of compositionality: Le meme as an existential quantifier3.1 Distributivity; 3.2 Le même and syntactic movement; 3.2.1 Quantifier raising; 3.2.2 Scope phenomena; 4. The event hypothesis; 5. Relation to pluractionality; 6. Conclusion; References; Topic prominence is not a factor of variation between Brazilian and European Portuguese; 1. Introduction; 2. BP as a discourse oriented language; 3. BP's topic-prominent properties in EP; 4. The locus of variation; 5. Conclusions; References; When dialectology studies contribute to lexical semantics and to etymology 1. Why is Dialectology able to bring such a fundamental contribution to Etymology and to the diachronic study of the lexicon?2. Is the classical approach in Etymology not a lexical reconstruction?; 3. What does the etymological approach consist in when attested Latin data lack?; Example 1 fr. câliner; Example 2 fr. petit ; occ. petito; Example 3 fr. chat-huant; Example 4 fr. drôle; occ.: drole; 4. Other possibility: The Latin source exists but cannot be located; Example 5 the mysterious name of a the swift in the Friuli, Italy] Example 6 the name of the Mistle Thrush in a part of the Occitan area |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910781580403321 |
| Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer
| Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009 : selected papers from "Going Romance" Nice 2009 / / edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, Tobias Scheer |
| Edizione | [1st ed.] |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (402 p.) |
| Disciplina | 440 |
| Altri autori (Persone) |
BernsJanine
JacobsHaike <1961-> ScheerTobias <1968-> |
| Collana | Romance languages and linguistic theory (RLLT) |
| Soggetto topico | Romance languages |
| ISBN |
1-283-32900-X
9786613329004 90-272-8218-8 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Expressing contrast in Romanian; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Iar and the Romanian coordination system in a Romance perspective; 1.2 An overview of the uses of iar; 2. Constraints on iar; 2.1 Information Structure; 2.2 Syntax; 3. Double contrastiveness; 3.1 Double contrastiveness and quantification; 3.2 Predicate negation: Comparison with dar and si; 3.3 A blocking analysis of Romanian connectives; 3.4 Taking stock; 4. Conclusion; References; When the benefit is on the fringe
1. Introduction2. Arguments against a low applicative; 2.1 Pylkkänen 2008; 2.2 Challenges to the received applicative analysis; 3. French non-core datives; 3.1 Low applicative properties; 3.2 High applicative properties; 3.3 Summary; 4. Coreferential Dative Constructions; 5. Benefactive vs. Coreferential non-core datives; 6. Syntactic analysis; 6.1 The syntactic difference between BDs and CDs; 6.2 Embedding under causative-faire; 7. Conclusion; References; Degree fronting in Québec French and the syntactic structure of degree quantifier DPS; 1. Introduction; 2. Degree Fronting and IAD 2.1 Degree Fronting in English2.2 Intensification at a Distance; 3. A movement analysis of IAD?; 3.1 Matushansky (2002); 3.2 Arguments against movement: IAD in Quebec French; 3.3 Degree quantifiers within DP; 4. Semantic variation and analysis; 4.1 Dialectal variation; 4.2 Towards a Compositional Semantics for IAD; 5. Conclusion; References; On sentence-internal le même ('the same') in French and Pluractionality; 1. Introduction; 2. The problem of definiteness: Le meme as a complex determiner; 2.1 Presuppositions; 2.2 Specificity; 2.3 DP-internal distribution of même 3. The problem of compositionality: Le meme as an existential quantifier3.1 Distributivity; 3.2 Le même and syntactic movement; 3.2.1 Quantifier raising; 3.2.2 Scope phenomena; 4. The event hypothesis; 5. Relation to pluractionality; 6. Conclusion; References; Topic prominence is not a factor of variation between Brazilian and European Portuguese; 1. Introduction; 2. BP as a discourse oriented language; 3. BP's topic-prominent properties in EP; 4. The locus of variation; 5. Conclusions; References; When dialectology studies contribute to lexical semantics and to etymology 1. Why is Dialectology able to bring such a fundamental contribution to Etymology and to the diachronic study of the lexicon?2. Is the classical approach in Etymology not a lexical reconstruction?; 3. What does the etymological approach consist in when attested Latin data lack?; Example 1 fr. câliner; Example 2 fr. petit ; occ. petito; Example 3 fr. chat-huant; Example 4 fr. drôle; occ.: drole; 4. Other possibility: The Latin source exists but cannot be located; Example 5 the mysterious name of a the swift in the Friuli, Italy] Example 6 the name of the Mistle Thrush in a part of the Occitan area |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910828517803321 |
| Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2011 | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||