Info
- Utilizzare la checkbox di selezione a fianco di ciascun documento per attivare le funzionalità di stampa, invio email, download nei formati disponibili del (i) record.
Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo
| Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo |
| Autore | Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (108 p.) |
| Disciplina |
660.2804
660/.2804 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | LorenzoD. K <1955-> (Donald K.) |
| Collana | CCPS concept book |
| Soggetto topico | Chemical plants - Risk assessment |
| Soggetto genere / forma | Electronic books. |
| ISBN |
1-282-78334-3
9786612783340 0-470-93546-4 1-59124-574-5 0-470-93545-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa  |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis; CONTENTS; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; Advice for the Reader; Acronyms; Glossary; 1 INTRODUCTION; 1.1. BACKGROUND; 1.2. THE PROCESS OF RISK ANALYSIS; 1.3. DEFINITION OF QRA; 1.4. MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT QRA; 2 DECIDING WHETHER TO USE QRA; 2.1. SOME REASONS FOR CONSIDERING QRA; 2.2. TYPES OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM RISK STUDIES; 2.3. CRITERIA FOR ELECTING TO USE QRA; 3 MANAGEMENT USE OF QRA; 3.1. CHARTERING THE ANALYSIS; 3.1.1. Study Objective
3.1.2. Scope3.1.3. Technical Approach; 3.1.4. Resources; 3.2. SELECTING QRATECHNIQUES; 3.2.1. Hazard Identification; 3.2.2. Consequence Analysis; 3.2.3. Frequency Analysis; 3.2.4. Risk Evaluation and Presentation; 3.3. UNDERSTANDING THE ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS; 3.3.1. Completeness; 3.3.2. Model Validity; 3.3.3. Accuracy/Uncertainty; 3.3.4. Reproducibility; 3.3.5. Inscrutability; 4 USING QRA RESULTS; 4.1. COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING PERSPECTIVE; 4.2. FACTORS INFLUENCING RISK PERCEPTION; 4.2.1. Type of Hazard; 4.2.2. Voluntary versus lnvoluntary; 4.2.3. Societal versus Individual 4.2.4. Public versus Employee4.2.5. High Consequence/Low Frequency versus Low Consequence/High Frequency; 4.2.6. Acute versus Latent Effects; 4.2.7. Familiarity; 4.2.8. Controllability; 4.2.9. Age of Exposed Population; 4.2.10. Distribution of Risk and Benefit; 4.3. COMMUNICATING RISK; 4.3.1. Accept and lnvolve the Public as a Legitimate Partner; 4.3.2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Your Efforts; 4.3.3. Listen to People's Specific Concerns; 4.3.4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open; 4.3.5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources; 4.3.6. Meet the Needs of the Media 4.3.7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion4.4. PITFALLS IN USING QRA RESULTS; 5 CONCLUSIONS; References; Suggested Additional Reading |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910142522603321 |
Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952->
|
||
| Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo
| Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo |
| Autore | Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (108 p.) |
| Disciplina |
660.2804
660/.2804 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | LorenzoD. K <1955-> (Donald K.) |
| Collana | CCPS concept book |
| Soggetto topico | Chemical plants - Risk assessment |
| ISBN |
1-282-78334-3
9786612783340 0-470-93546-4 1-59124-574-5 0-470-93545-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis; CONTENTS; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; Advice for the Reader; Acronyms; Glossary; 1 INTRODUCTION; 1.1. BACKGROUND; 1.2. THE PROCESS OF RISK ANALYSIS; 1.3. DEFINITION OF QRA; 1.4. MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT QRA; 2 DECIDING WHETHER TO USE QRA; 2.1. SOME REASONS FOR CONSIDERING QRA; 2.2. TYPES OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM RISK STUDIES; 2.3. CRITERIA FOR ELECTING TO USE QRA; 3 MANAGEMENT USE OF QRA; 3.1. CHARTERING THE ANALYSIS; 3.1.1. Study Objective
3.1.2. Scope3.1.3. Technical Approach; 3.1.4. Resources; 3.2. SELECTING QRATECHNIQUES; 3.2.1. Hazard Identification; 3.2.2. Consequence Analysis; 3.2.3. Frequency Analysis; 3.2.4. Risk Evaluation and Presentation; 3.3. UNDERSTANDING THE ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS; 3.3.1. Completeness; 3.3.2. Model Validity; 3.3.3. Accuracy/Uncertainty; 3.3.4. Reproducibility; 3.3.5. Inscrutability; 4 USING QRA RESULTS; 4.1. COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING PERSPECTIVE; 4.2. FACTORS INFLUENCING RISK PERCEPTION; 4.2.1. Type of Hazard; 4.2.2. Voluntary versus lnvoluntary; 4.2.3. Societal versus Individual 4.2.4. Public versus Employee4.2.5. High Consequence/Low Frequency versus Low Consequence/High Frequency; 4.2.6. Acute versus Latent Effects; 4.2.7. Familiarity; 4.2.8. Controllability; 4.2.9. Age of Exposed Population; 4.2.10. Distribution of Risk and Benefit; 4.3. COMMUNICATING RISK; 4.3.1. Accept and lnvolve the Public as a Legitimate Partner; 4.3.2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Your Efforts; 4.3.3. Listen to People's Specific Concerns; 4.3.4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open; 4.3.5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources; 4.3.6. Meet the Needs of the Media 4.3.7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion4.4. PITFALLS IN USING QRA RESULTS; 5 CONCLUSIONS; References; Suggested Additional Reading |
| Record Nr. | UNISA-996199267803316 |
|
Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952->
|
||
| Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. di Salerno | ||
| ||
Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo
| Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry [[electronic resource] ] : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo |
| Autore | Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (108 p.) |
| Disciplina |
660.2804
660/.2804 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | LorenzoD. K <1955-> (Donald K.) |
| Collana | CCPS concept book |
| Soggetto topico | Chemical plants - Risk assessment |
| ISBN |
1-282-78334-3
9786612783340 0-470-93546-4 1-59124-574-5 0-470-93545-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis; CONTENTS; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; Advice for the Reader; Acronyms; Glossary; 1 INTRODUCTION; 1.1. BACKGROUND; 1.2. THE PROCESS OF RISK ANALYSIS; 1.3. DEFINITION OF QRA; 1.4. MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT QRA; 2 DECIDING WHETHER TO USE QRA; 2.1. SOME REASONS FOR CONSIDERING QRA; 2.2. TYPES OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM RISK STUDIES; 2.3. CRITERIA FOR ELECTING TO USE QRA; 3 MANAGEMENT USE OF QRA; 3.1. CHARTERING THE ANALYSIS; 3.1.1. Study Objective
3.1.2. Scope3.1.3. Technical Approach; 3.1.4. Resources; 3.2. SELECTING QRATECHNIQUES; 3.2.1. Hazard Identification; 3.2.2. Consequence Analysis; 3.2.3. Frequency Analysis; 3.2.4. Risk Evaluation and Presentation; 3.3. UNDERSTANDING THE ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS; 3.3.1. Completeness; 3.3.2. Model Validity; 3.3.3. Accuracy/Uncertainty; 3.3.4. Reproducibility; 3.3.5. Inscrutability; 4 USING QRA RESULTS; 4.1. COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING PERSPECTIVE; 4.2. FACTORS INFLUENCING RISK PERCEPTION; 4.2.1. Type of Hazard; 4.2.2. Voluntary versus lnvoluntary; 4.2.3. Societal versus Individual 4.2.4. Public versus Employee4.2.5. High Consequence/Low Frequency versus Low Consequence/High Frequency; 4.2.6. Acute versus Latent Effects; 4.2.7. Familiarity; 4.2.8. Controllability; 4.2.9. Age of Exposed Population; 4.2.10. Distribution of Risk and Benefit; 4.3. COMMUNICATING RISK; 4.3.1. Accept and lnvolve the Public as a Legitimate Partner; 4.3.2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Your Efforts; 4.3.3. Listen to People's Specific Concerns; 4.3.4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open; 4.3.5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources; 4.3.6. Meet the Needs of the Media 4.3.7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion4.4. PITFALLS IN USING QRA RESULTS; 5 CONCLUSIONS; References; Suggested Additional Reading |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910829839203321 |
|
Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952->
|
||
| Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||
Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo
| Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry : a user's guide to quantitative risk analysis / / J.S. Arendt, D.K. Lorenzo |
| Autore | Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952-> |
| Pubbl/distr/stampa | Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council |
| Descrizione fisica | 1 online resource (108 p.) |
| Disciplina | 660/.2804 |
| Altri autori (Persone) | LorenzoD. K <1955-> (Donald K.) |
| Collana | CCPS concept book |
| Soggetto topico | Chemical plants - Risk assessment |
| ISBN |
1-282-78334-3
9786612783340 0-470-93546-4 1-59124-574-5 0-470-93545-6 |
| Formato | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione | eng |
| Nota di contenuto |
Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis; CONTENTS; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; Advice for the Reader; Acronyms; Glossary; 1 INTRODUCTION; 1.1. BACKGROUND; 1.2. THE PROCESS OF RISK ANALYSIS; 1.3. DEFINITION OF QRA; 1.4. MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT QRA; 2 DECIDING WHETHER TO USE QRA; 2.1. SOME REASONS FOR CONSIDERING QRA; 2.2. TYPES OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM RISK STUDIES; 2.3. CRITERIA FOR ELECTING TO USE QRA; 3 MANAGEMENT USE OF QRA; 3.1. CHARTERING THE ANALYSIS; 3.1.1. Study Objective
3.1.2. Scope3.1.3. Technical Approach; 3.1.4. Resources; 3.2. SELECTING QRATECHNIQUES; 3.2.1. Hazard Identification; 3.2.2. Consequence Analysis; 3.2.3. Frequency Analysis; 3.2.4. Risk Evaluation and Presentation; 3.3. UNDERSTANDING THE ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS; 3.3.1. Completeness; 3.3.2. Model Validity; 3.3.3. Accuracy/Uncertainty; 3.3.4. Reproducibility; 3.3.5. Inscrutability; 4 USING QRA RESULTS; 4.1. COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING PERSPECTIVE; 4.2. FACTORS INFLUENCING RISK PERCEPTION; 4.2.1. Type of Hazard; 4.2.2. Voluntary versus lnvoluntary; 4.2.3. Societal versus Individual 4.2.4. Public versus Employee4.2.5. High Consequence/Low Frequency versus Low Consequence/High Frequency; 4.2.6. Acute versus Latent Effects; 4.2.7. Familiarity; 4.2.8. Controllability; 4.2.9. Age of Exposed Population; 4.2.10. Distribution of Risk and Benefit; 4.3. COMMUNICATING RISK; 4.3.1. Accept and lnvolve the Public as a Legitimate Partner; 4.3.2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Your Efforts; 4.3.3. Listen to People's Specific Concerns; 4.3.4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open; 4.3.5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources; 4.3.6. Meet the Needs of the Media 4.3.7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion4.4. PITFALLS IN USING QRA RESULTS; 5 CONCLUSIONS; References; Suggested Additional Reading |
| Record Nr. | UNINA-9910876974003321 |
|
Arendt J. S (J. Steven), <1952->
|
||
| Arlington, Va., : American Chemistry Council | ||
| Materiale a stampa | ||
| Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II | ||
| ||