Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar / / edited by Aafke Hulk, Jean-Yves Pollock



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Titolo: Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar / / edited by Aafke Hulk, Jean-Yves Pollock Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Oxford ; ; New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2001
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource ([vii], 215 pages)
Disciplina: 440.045
440/.045
Soggetto topico: Romance languages - Word order
Romance languages - Topic and comment
Grammar, Comparative and general
Altri autori: HulkA (Aafke)  
PollockJ.-Y (Jean-Yves)  
Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: Contents; Contributors; 1. Subject Positions in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar; 2. On Inversion in Wh-questions in Romance; 3. ""Inversion"" as Focalization; 4. Marked versus Unmarked Inversion and Optimality Theory; 5. New Thoughts on Stylistic Inversion; 6. Subject Extraction, the Distribution of Expletives, and Stylistic Inversion; 7. The Constraint on Preverbal Subjects in Romance Interrogatives: A Minimality Effect; Index
Sommario/riassunto: The Romance Languages document remarkable variations in subject word order in different constructions, and have various restrictions in their occurrence. No consensus has emerged on what the paramaters are for such variations. This volume does not attempt to create a consensus, but tries to represent and bring into dialogue the different sides of the debate.
Titolo autorizzato: Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-19-772252-0
1-280-53124-X
1-4237-3808-X
0-19-534954-7
1-60256-442-6
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910828747303321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui
Serie: Oxford studies in comparative syntax.