Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

The verdict of battle [[electronic resource] ] : the law of victory and the making of modern war / / James Q. Whitman



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Whitman James Q. <1957-> Visualizza persona
Titolo: The verdict of battle [[electronic resource] ] : the law of victory and the making of modern war / / James Q. Whitman Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cambridge, Mass., : Harvard University Press, 2012
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (323 p.)
Disciplina: 172/.42
Soggetto topico: War - Moral and ethical aspects
Combat - Moral and ethical aspects
Battles - Europe - History - 18th century
Military art and science - Europe - History - 18th century
War (International law)
Military ethics - History - 18th century
Soggetto geografico: Europe History, Military 18th century
Note generali: Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: Why battles matter -- Accepting the wager of battle -- Laying just claim to the profits of war -- The monarchical monopolization of military violence -- Were there really rules? -- The death of pitched battle.
Sommario/riassunto: Today, war is considered a last resort for resolving disagreements. But a day of staged slaughter on the battlefield was once seen as a legitimate means of settling political disputes. James Whitman argues that pitched battle was essentially a trial with a lawful verdict. And when this contained form of battle ceased to exist, the law of victory gave way to the rule of unbridled force. The Verdict of Battle explains why the ritualized violence of the past was more effective than modern warfare in bringing carnage to an end, and why humanitarian laws that cling to a notion of war as evil have led to longer, more barbaric conflicts. Belief that sovereigns could, by rights, wage war for profit made the eighteenth century battle's golden age. A pitched battle was understood as a kind of legal proceeding in which both sides agreed to be bound by the result. To the victor went the spoils, including the fate of kingdoms. But with the nineteenth-century decline of monarchical legitimacy and the rise of republican sentiment, the public no longer accepted the verdict of pitched battles. Ideology rather than politics became war's just cause. And because modern humanitarian law provided no means for declaring a victor or dispensing spoils at the end of battle, the violence of war dragged on. The most dangerous wars, Whitman asserts in this iconoclastic tour de force, are the lawless wars we wage today to remake the world in the name of higher moral imperatives.
Titolo autorizzato: The verdict of battle  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-674-07187-5
0-674-06811-4
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910785923803321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui