Vai al contenuto principale della pagina
| Autore: |
Laporte Antoine
|
| Titolo: |
Territorial Division for Public Action
|
| Pubblicazione: | Newark : , : John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, , 2025 |
| ©2025 | |
| Edizione: | 1st ed. |
| Descrizione fisica: | 1 online resource (318 pages) |
| Disciplina: | 352.140944 |
| Altri autori: |
RibardièreAntonine
|
| Nota di contenuto: | Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Part 1. Territorial Division and the Political Project -- Chapter 1. France's Départements and Municipalities: Fossils or Phoenixes? -- 1.1. Introduction -- 1.2. Republican equality embodied by regular territorial division -- 1.2.1. The invention of départements and communes or the territorial emanation of the revolution -- 1.2.2. An extremely solid administrative pyramid -- 1.2.3. From republican consensus to fragmentation: boundaries in question throughout the 20th century -- 1.3. The age of decentralization: the invention of regions and intermunicipal structures -- 1.3.1. The regional trigger -- 1.3.2. The development of EPCIs as a consequence to the fragmentation of the communal territory -- 1.3.3. Towards the end of the cohabitation between départements and regions -- 1.4. In the 2010s, continuing decentralization without eliminating any tiers -- 1.4.1. Territorial reform and its disruptive effects -- 1.4.2. Revenge for the municipalities? -- 1.4.3. A more complex administrative structure -- 1.5. Conclusion -- 1.6. References -- Chapter 2. Intermunicipal Division: An Ambiguous Revolution -- 2.1. Introduction -- 2.2. The origin of the intermunicipal association: the inadequacies of an unbreakable municipal territorial division -- 2.2.1. A very fine-scale municipal division -- 2.2.2. Municipal fragmentation is becoming increasingly problematic -- 2.2.3. The immovability of municipal division -- 2.3. Intermunicipal division: the rapid but gradual construction of a new division at local level -- 2.3.1. The intermunicipality in France: brief reminders and basic definitions -- 2.3.2. The revival of the intermunicipality in the 1990s -- 2.3.3. As of 2010, completion, deepening and streamlining -- 2.4. Impacts, stakes and debates. |
| 2.4.1. A delicate and pointless evaluation -- 2.4.2. Relevant, coherent, expanded: the central question of borders -- 2.4.3. The political stakes -- 2.4.4. Intermunicipal division and other territorial divisions: what impact on the French territorial administrative system? -- 2.5. Conclusion -- 2.6. References -- Chapter 3. Contradictory Bets on a Greater Paris -- 3.1. Introduction -- 3.2. Bigger, more democratic? -- 3.3. Bigger, more coherent? -- 3.4. Conclusion: how the scale changes -- 3.5. References -- Chapter 4. Creating Neighborhoods for Participatory Democracy -- 4.1. Introduction -- 4.2. Neighborhoods at the National Assembly and the Senate: the grand narratives of republican territory reinterpreted -- 4.2.1. Fear of communal "gridding": Mirabeau's victory? -- 4.2.2. Scales of power: the return of Sieyès? -- 4.3. Setting up neighborhoods: elusive legality, uncertain pragmatism -- 4.3.1. Making neighborhoods: an act of sovereignty and a marker of political divisions -- 4.3.2. The gridding paradigm: Sieyès' final victory -- 4.4. Making territories: the facts of division -- 4.4.1. Four revindicated criteria for division -- 4.4.2. Putting a "grid" into practice -- 4.4.3. The borders of Parisian neighborhoods: the return of Mirabeau? -- 4.5. Conclusion -- 4.6. References -- Chapter 5. Division for Better Governance in Post-Revolution Tunisia -- 5.1. Introduction -- 5.2. Genesis and evolution of territorial divisions in Tunisia -- 5.2.1. The blurred boundaries of tribal territories -- 5.2.2. Civil control: the basis for a dualist territorial division -- 5.2.3. Building and consolidating the modern state: shaping and reshaping the territory -- 5.2.4. An unequal and partial communal division -- 5.3. Land communalization in post-revolution Tunisia: the legal impasse, the political agenda and the technical solution. | |
| 5.3.1. Constitutionalizing of decentralization: progress and/or legal impasse -- 5.3.2. Communalizing the territory without changing the administrative division: a technical solution for a political agenda -- 5.4. Communalization: between past territorial heritage and future electoral implications -- 5.4.1. The difficult compromise between administrative and local authority boundaries -- 5.4.2. The electoral implications of communalization -- 5.5. Conclusion -- 5.6. References -- Part 2. Territorial Division and Access to Rights -- Chapter 6. The Challenges of the French Judicial Map -- 6.1. Introduction -- 6.2. Rationality, equality, technicality, profit: the multiple foundations of the French judicial map -- 6.2.1. The evolution of territorial division since the French Revolution -- 6.2.2. A dogmatic clash over court territorial divisions -- 6.2.3. Political divisions? -- 6.2.4. The judicial map, a State monopoly -- 6.3. What impact do judicial territorial divisions have on access to the courts and the delivery of justice? -- 6.3.1. The 2009 reform of the judicial map: a limited and exceptional impact on theoretical accessibility to the courts -- 6.3.2. Tighter or looser territorial division has little impact on actual accessibility to the courts -- 6.3.3. Judicial territorial division, a powerful factor in inequalities and the delivery of justice -- 6.4. Conclusion -- 6.5. References -- Chapter 7. School Sectorization, the Territorial Division of the French Republic's Schools? -- 7.1. Introduction -- 7.2. From Jules Ferry to the collège unique: standardizing public secondary education and financing private schools -- 7.2.1. The Third Republic: elitist secondary education -- 7.2.2. The introduction of public funding for private education under Vichy -- 7.2.3. The Gaullist Fifth Republic: modernization, massification, sectorization. | |
| 7.2.4. The turning point of the collège unique -- 7.3. Opening up education and sectorization (1981-2007) -- 7.3.1. Persistent disparities between institutions -- 7.3.2. Priority education districts -- 7.3.3. Sectorization reaffirmed -- 7.3.4. Easing the constraint -- 7.4. 2007-2012: pseudo-de-sectorization and its consequences -- 7.4.1. The announcement of the "abolition of school mapping" -- 7.4.2. Increasing school segregation in urban areas -- 7.4.3. The boom in private education and the changing relationship between families and schools -- 7.5. 2012-2020: Believing that sectorization is a good thing, but that current boundaries are wrong and lead to segregation -- 7.5.1. A poorly thought-out territorial division -- 7.5.2. Modernizing school sectorization in a context of inequality -- 7.6. Conclusion: when the framework hides the territorial division -- 7.7. References -- Chapter 8. The Territorial Division of Social Action to Promote Cohesion and Reduce Inequalities -- 8.1. Introduction -- 8.2. Professional territorial division, unstable by nature? -- 8.3. From specialized administrative zoning to the territorialization of the département's public action -- 8.4. Towards infra-département division? -- 8.5. Conclusion -- 8.6. References -- Chapter 9. France's Territorial Frameworks for Public Health Policy -- 9.1. Introduction -- 9.2. When the territorial division of healthcare translates into state oversight -- 9.2.1. The commune and the département: the first organizational units -- 9.2.2. Towards gradual centralization -- 9.3. Division as a tool for redistribution -- 9.3.1. The turnaround of the 1970s: proactive planning and healthcare mapping 186 -- 9.3.2. From State planner to State facilitator, the regional level reaffirmed -- 9.3.3. From the healthcare sector to experimentation with new, more inclusive territorial divisions. | |
| 9.4. Towards multi-form territories? -- 9.4.1. The 2009 HPST law: the territory as a tool for bringing all actors together -- 9.4.2. Mobilizing local resources to meet requirements: the ambiguity of a new "territory" tool -- 9.4.3. GHT and CPTS: territorial divisions as vectors for structuring territories? 194 -- 9.5. Conclusion -- 9.6. References -- Part 3. Sharing Public Action: From Territorial Division to Zoning -- Chapter 10. Selecting and Acting upon "Priority Neighborhoods" to Reduce Inequalities? -- 10.1. Introduction -- 10.2. Urban policy or the construction of a territorialized public problem -- 10.2.1. The neighborhood as a category for public action -- 10.2.2. From public categorization to "neighborhood effects" -- 10.2.3. Social development and social diversity to reduce inequalities? -- 10.3. "Priority geography" as a tool for decentralized public action -- 10.3.1. The 2014 reform: meaning and effects of the poverty criterion? -- 10.3.2. The impossibility of intermunicipal zoning -- 10.4. Acting on "priority neighborhoods" to combat inequality? -- 10.4.1. Tensions and adjustments on recurring issues -- 10.4.2. What are the alternatives to a zoning system that is constantly being called into question? -- 10.5. Conclusion -- 10.6. References -- Chapter 11. Demarcate to Preserve: Zoning Protected Areas in France -- 11.1. Introduction: territorial division and nature: an oxymoron? -- 11.2. From naturalistic and deterministic presuppositions to the political boundaries of protected areas: an ongoing negotiation -- 11.2.1. The "grammar" of spatial demarcation -- 11.2.2. Justification for the boundary despite infrastructure -- 11.2.3. Entering the territorial division and marking the boundary: airlocks, gates, milestones and markers. | |
| 11.3. Inside and outside: the territorial division of protected spaces or the shaping of compromise through space. | |
| Sommario/riassunto: | The reader may be amazed when they are faced with the sheer number of territorial divisions associated with public action, and full of questions. What justifies this diversity? What are the problems that arise from these divisions? Why don't the limits of public action simply follow administrative and political subdivisions? Territorial Division for Public Action focuses on the situation in France, proposing three different approaches. First, we consider the functions that are associated with these territorial divisions: equitable distribution of resources across the territory, administration and the management of public services. However, they are also a tool for maintaining power. Lastly, we consider the effects these divisions have on the implementation of public action and on socio-spatial structures. These divisions reflect political projects, which embody the issues as much as the partition design itself does. The recent reform of territorial regions, alongside a gradual imposition of intercommunal links in France, has given rise to political debates at both local and national levels. |
| Titolo autorizzato: | Territorial Division for Public Action ![]() |
| ISBN: | 1-394-37265-5 |
| 1-394-37263-9 | |
| Formato: | Materiale a stampa |
| Livello bibliografico | Monografia |
| Lingua di pubblicazione: | Inglese |
| Record Nr.: | 9911018797203321 |
| Lo trovi qui: | Univ. Federico II |
| Opac: | Controlla la disponibilità qui |