Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Scrutinizing argumentation in practice / / edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Titolo: Scrutinizing argumentation in practice / / edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2015]
©2015
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (353 p.)
Disciplina: 808
Soggetto topico: Persuasion (Rhetoric)
Discourse analysis
Persona (resp. second.): EemerenF. H. van <1946-> (Frans Hendrik)
GarssenBart
Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; PART I A general perspective applied to scientific controversies; Arguing in the Grooves; 1. Introduction; 2. Genre and language constraints; 2.1 Types of controversies and their resolution; 3. That woodpecker; 4. Arsenic-incorporating bacteria; 5. The hobbit; 6. Conclusion; References ; PART II Argumentation in a political context; Cultural differences in political debate; 1. Introduction; 2. The debates in context; 2.1 The 2010 British Prime Minister debates
2.3 Argumentative acts between Pragma-dialectics and ScaPoLine3. Illustrative analysis; 3.1 Confrontation Stage coded through REPORTED-DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.2 Confrontation & Concluding Stage through NEGATIVE + DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.3 Argumentation Stage through QUOTED SPEECH; 4. Concluding; References ; A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The implementation of pragmatic argumentation in legal justification as part of a stereotypical pattern of argumentation; 2.1 The argumentation on the first level of the main argumentation: Pragmatic argumentation
2.2 The argumentation on the second and third level of the subordinate argumentation3. Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation referring to consequences in light of the purpose of the rule in legal justification; 3.1 The justification of the applicability of the argumentation scheme of pragmatic argumentation; 4. Conclusion; References; Transparency in legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. Administrative judicial decisions as a specific activity type; 3. Dutch administrative law procedure; 4. Administrative judicial decisions and the composite audience
5. Addressing a compositite audience
Titolo autorizzato: Scrutinizing argumentation in practice  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 90-272-6808-8
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910807344303321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui
Serie: Argumentation in context ; ; v. 9.