Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Against obligation [[electronic resource] ] : the multiple sources of authority in a liberal democracy / / Abner S. Greene



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Greene Abner <1960-> Visualizza persona
Titolo: Against obligation [[electronic resource] ] : the multiple sources of authority in a liberal democracy / / Abner S. Greene Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cambridge, Mass., : Harvard University Press, 2012
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (346 p.)
Disciplina: 340/.112
Soggetto topico: Constitutional law - United States
Effectiveness and validity of law
Law - Moral and ethical aspects
Obedience (Law)
Note generali: Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references (p.303-321) and index.
Nota di contenuto: Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. AGAINST POLITICAL OBLIGATION -- 2. ACCOMMODATING OUR PLURAL OBLIGATIONS -- 3. AGAINST INTERPRETIVE OBLIGATION TO THE PAST -- 4. AGAINST INTERPRETIVE OBLIGATION TO THE SUPREME COURT -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INDEX
Sommario/riassunto: Do citizens of a nation such as the United States have a moral duty to obey the law? Do officials, when interpreting the Constitution, have an obligation to follow what that text meant when ratified? To follow precedent? To follow what the Supreme Court today says the Constitution means?These are questions of political obligation (for citizens) and interpretive obligation (for anyone interpreting the Constitution, often officials). Abner Greene argues that such obligations do not exist. Although citizens should obey some laws entirely, and other laws in some instances, no one has put forth a successful argument that citizens should obey all laws all the time. Greene's case is not only "against" obligation. It is also "for" an approach he calls "permeable sovereignty": all of our norms are on equal footing with the state's laws. Accordingly, the state should accommodate religious, philosophical, family, or tribal norms whenever possible.Greene shows that questions of interpretive obligation share many qualities with those of political obligation. In rejecting the view that constitutional interpreters must follow either prior or higher sources of constitutional meaning, Greene confronts and turns aside arguments similar to those offered for a moral duty of citizens to obey the law.
Titolo autorizzato: Against obligation  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-674-06517-4
0-674-06939-0
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910791939703321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui